Bragg files against jordan for 'transparent attempt to intimidate' him

butters

High on a Hill
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
85,739
NEW YORK (AP) — Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg filed a federal lawsuit against Rep. Jim Jordan on Tuesday, accusing the Republican of a “transparent campaign to intimidate and attack” him over his indictment of former President Donald Trump.

The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing in Manhattan on Monday on crime in New York City and what it alleges are Bragg’s “pro-crime, anti-victim” policies. The D.A.’s office, however, points to statistics showing that violent crime in Manhattan has dropped since Bragg took office in January 2022.

In response, Bragg said that if Jordan, who is from Ohio, “really cared about public safety,” he would travel to some of the major cities in his home state, where crime is reportedly higher than in New York.
Bragg's requesting a judge deny jordan's subpoenas.
Bragg, in his lawsuit, said he’s taking legal action “in response to an unprecedently brazen and unconstitutional attack by members of Congress on an ongoing New York State criminal prosecution and investigation of former President Donald J. Trump.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=b7fed8a4ce7d4db4b414a1203e1d2db0&ei=37
 
What a little snowflake.
Oh! Denying subpoenas is what snowflakes do??
Damn!! There are a lot of snowflakes
There are even snowflakes for those who don’t want to be snowflakes!!
The King of snowflakes has his minions prove that they are also snowflakes.
Screw the laws! Snowflakes know better
Oh wait, this one is a judge
Didn’t Jordan deny a subpoena??
The difference? The legislature trying to dictate to the Judiciary, vs Legislature just following its own rules
 
Jordan is real worried.
Jordan is going to get owned again!

And Trump's new lawsuit against Cohen? WTF is that? This guy uses up more court time than any 1000 other citizens! That's a LOW LOW LOW estimate. Make the fucker PAY !!! Oh no, wait, make all his contributors (aka Butt kissers) pay!
 
Last edited:
Jordan is going to get owned again!

And Trump's new lawsuit against Cohen? WTF is that? This guy uses up more court time than any 1000 other citizens! That's a LOW LOW LOW estimate. Make the fucker PAY !!! Oh no, wait, make all his contributors (aka Butt kissers) pay!

Lol, the judge excoriated Bragg for his filing. It's even incomplete as to it's own documents/exhibits.

Temporary injunction denied! Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Trump's suit is him punching back against Cohen and getting the information out there that Cohen is a liar and a schemer by using Cohen's own acknowledged words and deeds to prove it. It's a brilliant legal move because it chops Cohen's testimony off at the knees without involving Bragg's case at all.
 
Lol, the judge excoriated Bragg for his filing. It's even incomplete as to it's own documents/exhibits.

Temporary injunction denied! Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Trump's suit is him punching back against Cohen and getting the information out there that Cohen is a liar and a schemer by using Cohen's own acknowledged words and deeds to prove it. It's a brilliant legal move because it chops Cohen's testimony off at the knees without involving Bragg's case at all.
Butters is sad.
 
Harpy getting active on the board:

Must be another bad day in MAGAt world.

👉 Harpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Almost everyone has their "oh shit, I shouldn't have done that" moment. This could be Bragg's.
Crime is soaring under Bragg's dereliction. Rape is up 18.3%, Robbery is up 41.7%, Felony assault is up 32.6%, and Grand Larceny is up 57.6% all while Braggs labors mightily to reduce major felonies into minor misdemeanors.
 
Crime is soaring under Bragg's dereliction. Rape is up 18.3%, Robbery is up 41.7%, Felony assault is up 32.6%, and Grand Larceny is up 57.6% all while Braggs labors mightily to reduce major felonies into minor misdemeanors.

Bragg probably believes he's doing his duty properly. That doesn't mean he is, it means he believes he is.
 
He's following the Soros blueprint for "progressive' justice.

Soros is a crackpot who believes that forcing people to pay money for temporary absolution is a better social ideal than actual abstinence from criminal behavior.
 
Prosecutors in former President Donald Trump's Manhattan criminal case have released to his attorneys a recording of Trump and a witness, whose identity was not disclosed, according to a document the office made public Friday.
The document lists the dates of 34 instances between Feb. 14, 2017 and Dec. 5, 2017 when he allegedly falsified records.

In a section devoted to electronic evidence that will be turned over, a prosecutor for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office indicated they have disclosed to the defense a "recording of a conversation between defendant and a witness."
The section also indicates prosecutors intend to disclose recordings of calls between witnesses and others.

;)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=438a0719b4024668841500e9ff45b110&ei=38
 
judge allows Carroll's lawyers to release tape of trump's 'unfortunately—or fortunately' deposition to Bragg's prosecutors

A federal judge on Thursday decided to give the Manhattan District Attorney exactly what he wants: a video copy of former President Donald Trump’s damning testimony in an unrelated rape and defamation case that was decided earlier this year.

For months, DA Alvin Bragg Jr.’s prosecutors have been trying to get their hands on a taped deposition in which Trump actually said stars like him get away with sexual harassment “unfortunately—or fortunately.”
the same judge will not make the decision about how or if this may be shown to jurors, but that is yet to come.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...&cvid=bc06fa2a20c84bf8e901961bfd855d8c&ei=113
 
judge allows Carroll's lawyers to release tape of trump's 'unfortunately—or fortunately' deposition to Bragg's prosecutors


the same judge will not make the decision about how or if this may be shown to jurors, but that is yet to come.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...&cvid=bc06fa2a20c84bf8e901961bfd855d8c&ei=113

It's discoverable evidence. No big deal because all the parties are aware of its existence.

I'm not sure how it attaches to the alleged hush money payment to Stormy Daniels though. Seems to me that it'd be irrelevant and more prejudicial than probative. Thus inadmissible.
 
Back
Top