Trump to be Arrested Tuesday

[icanhelp1]

Sure, those are your party over country rwcj talking points. Meanwhile, your orange god actually tried his best to shred the constitution in an effort to be president for life.


Barr was hired because he submitted an unsolicited but impeccably timed white paper to trump on why a sitting president couldn’t be charged with a crime. And don’t forget his misleading summary of the mueller report or his thumb on the scale in the nysd case, among other things. Barr was a loyal trumper until trump went off the rails with the election fraud insanity at which point Barr thought about his legacy, wrote a book, and went on a feeble redemption tour.

But do keep those MAGA blinders on.

Bragg is right on time! This sham indictment, like the democrat political hackery of the past, is once again timed to influence an election cycle. This is election interference on steroids.

You should use the " put the shoe on the other foot" analogy. If this happened to Obama, Clinton or Biden, well just saying. Hillary actually did violate campaign finance laws and was limited to paying a fine. Hillary actually obstructed a congressional subpoena, violated 18 USC 1924/ 798 and Comey's famous words " no REASONABLE prosecutor would bring a case against Clinton" but your OK with Bragg's indictment against Trump which doesn't present a case for a felony violation. The indictment doesn't include a statement of facts, doesn't present the supposed second criminal violation which bootstraps Bragg's original 34 count indictment to the level of a felony. Zealot Democrats hate Trump so much they don't care about the collateral damage they inflict on our republic.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Zealot Democrats hate Trump so much they don't care about the collateral damage they inflict on our republic.

1/6

 

[adrina]

Zealot Democrats hate Trump so much they don't care about the collateral damage they inflict on our republic.

Republicans (pretty much all of them are zealots these days) hate democrats so much that they don't care about the damage they inflict upon our country.

FYPYW

 

[Rightguide]

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

Stormy Daniels now owes $120K more to Trump in legal fees​

---

by ZACHARY ROGERS | The National Desk
Tue, April 4th 2023, 2:34 PM PDT

LOS ANGELES (TND) — Adult film star Stormy Daniels is now on the hook for even more of former President Trump's legal fees, according to new court documents released Tuesday.

Daniels was already ordered to pay Trump $300,000 in legal fees following a failed defamation lawsuit. The adult film star appealed paying those fees, but a court ruled against her last year.

After Tuesday's ruling, Daniels owes former President Trump an additional $121,962.56 in legals fees, according to documents filed in the United States Court of Appeals and released by the Dhillon Law Group.

Congratulations to President Trump on this final attorney fee victory in his favor this morning," said Harmeet Dhillon, the founder of Dhillon Law Group Inc., in her tweet. "Collectively, our firm obtained over $600,000 in attorney fee awards in his favor in the meritless litigation initiated by Stormy Daniels."

More here: https://komonews.com/news/nation-wo...es-appeal-donald-president-stephanie-clifford

 

[icanhelp1]

1/6

Bragg should be indicted for abuse of office and prosecutorial malfeasance. Trump‘s indictment was to put Trump on notice for what exactly? The indictment failed to present a statement of facts, present a crime other than 34 bookkeeping errors that outran the statute of limitations.

This sham indictment opens the door for DAs everywhere to falsely charge and indict anyone without fear of reprisals or prosecution themselves. Bragg should lose his license to practice law and charged with election interference and fraud.

In time we will find out the criminality of our justice system and DOJ. How they denied due process rights for hundreds of Americans. Appointing zealot democrat legal counsel to misrepresent clients. DOJ’s failure to prosecute protesters violating conservative supreme court’s justices safety protocols.

Bragg has only added to an already divided electorate.

 

[adrina]

added to an already divided electorate.

Heh that's funny considering you supported, support and will vote for again if given the option the one individual who has sewn the most division in this country in modern history.

 

[icanhelp1]

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

Stormy Daniels now owes $120K more to Trump in legal fees​

---

by ZACHARY ROGERS | The National Desk
Tue, April 4th 2023, 2:34 PM PDT

LOS ANGELES (TND) — Adult film star Stormy Daniels is now on the hook for even more of former President Trump's legal fees, according to new court documents released Tuesday.

Daniels was already ordered to pay Trump $300,000 in legal fees following a failed defamation lawsuit. The adult film star appealed paying those fees, but a court ruled against her last year.

After Tuesday's ruling, Daniels owes former President Trump an additional $121,962.56 in legals fees, according to documents filed in the United States Court of Appeals and released by the Dhillon Law Group.




More here: https://komonews.com/news/nation-wo...es-appeal-donald-president-stephanie-clifford

How Daniel’s is not prosecuted for extortion is beyond me. Daniel’s admitted that no relationship with Trump existed and yet Trump is being prosecuted for payments to hush up a scandal predicated on extortion. Our legal system is becoming the laughing stock of the world. Today, not much separates us from Venezuela.

 

[icanhelp1]

Heh that's funny considering you supported, support and will vote for again if given the option the one individual who has sewn the most division in this country in modern history.

The division stems from zealot democrats starting their impeachment rants back in 2016.

 

[ll74]

How Daniel’s is not prosecuted for extortion is beyond me. Daniel’s admitted that no relationship with Trump existed and yet Trump is being prosecuted for payments to hush up a scandal predicated on extortion. Our legal system is becoming the laughing stock of the world. Today, not much separates us from Venezuela.

The scandal was predicated.on Trump fucking a porn star during his current marriage and then attempting to cover it up by buying journalists. Whether the porn star did bad things doesn't make his behavior any less abhorrent. He has had affairs.during all of his marriages and bragged about sexually assaulting women. And he has consistently bought the silence of the women he slept with so that the public wouldn't find out.

But sure....poor Donny.

 

[adrina]

The division stems from zealot democrats starting their impeachment rants back in 2016.

Trump shouldn't have broken the law. However given the long republican history of weaponizing the government (Clinton's BJ, endless Obama, HRC's email ad nauseum) your glass house has quite a few shattered panes.

He also shouldn't have been a bullhorn for conservative hate aimed at their fellow American citizens.

Trump amplified the hate you feel and you like that about him. You like it so much that you will vote for him again if given the opportunity. And if he is re-elected, when he goes on his tirades denigrating the very citizens of the nation he leads you will support him. You will echo him. You will encourage him.

This is you. This is modern conservatives and the reality for the vast majority of republicans.

 

[Rightguide]

1/6

Stupid Bragg who claimed Trump conspired to falsify his records in order to commit another crime failed to identify in that indictment any such crime Trump intended to violate. Bragg should be disbarred.

 

[ll74]

Stupid Bragg who claimed Trump conspired to falsify his records in order to commit another crime failed to identify in that indictment any such crime Trump intended to violate. Bragg should be disbarred.

This is a stupid talking point of the right. The felony was falsifying records to cover up a crime. The covered up crime does not need to be included in the indictment and therefore isn't.

 

[Rightguide]

How Daniel’s is not prosecuted for extortion is beyond me. Daniel’s admitted that no relationship with Trump existed and yet Trump is being prosecuted for payments to hush up a scandal predicated on extortion. Our legal system is becoming the laughing stock of the world. Today, not much separates us from Venezuela.

Her attorney is doing 14 years in prison as we speak. He has been quoted as saying, "You Can’t Build a Case on the Testimony of Cohen and Daniels," Obviously Bragg wasn't listening.

 

[icanhelp1]

The scandal was predicted.on Trump fucking a porn star during his current marriage and then attempting to cover it up by buying journalists. Whether the porn star did bad things doesn't make his behavior any less abhorrent. He has had affairs.during all of his marriages and bragged about sexually assaulting women. And he has consistently bought the silence of the women he slept with so that the public wouldn't find out.

But sure....poor Donny.

Congress actually has a fund to cover up immoral and unethical behavior payed for by taxpayers.. Bill Clinton did the exact same thing but was never indicted for it. Hillary even took part in the cover up often destroying Bill’s playmates.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

How Daniel’s is not prosecuted for extortion is beyond me. Daniel’s admitted that no relationship with Trump existed and yet Trump is being prosecuted for payments to hush up a scandal predicated on extortion. Our legal system is becoming the laughing stock of the world. Today, not much separates us from Venezuela.

Actually he’s not being prosecuted for hush money payments. There is no law against that and it happens all the time. The foundation of the charges rests on falsifying business records which is a minor violation of NY state law. Bragg is attempting to bolster that into a felony by alleging the falsification was done to cover up a crime. It appears that he’ll try to prove the crime is related to campaign finance law violations and/or tax evasion. That’s the part that legal experts believe is a large hurdle for him. He campaigned on a promise to “get Trump” for something. This is the best he could come up with. Chances of conviction appear to be slim but there’s no downside is this ends in acquittal or dismissal because no one who voted for him will hold his efforts to fulfill a campaign promise against him.

 

[ll74]

Congress actually has a fund to cover up immoral and unethical behavior payed for by taxpayers.. Bill Clinton did the exact same thing but was never indicted for it. Hillary even took part in the cover up often destroying Bill’s playmates.

So you agree that the behavior is abhorrent and is actually where the bullshit originated
Thanks for confirming. It's refreshing to see a Republican put the blame where it belongs instead of making them a victim.

 

[icanhelp1]

Actually he’s not being prosecuted for hush money payments. There is no law against that and it happens all the time. The foundation of the charges rests on falsifying business records which is a minor violation of NY state law. Bragg is attempting to bolster that into a felony by alleging the falsification was done to cover up a crime. It appears that he’ll try to prove the crime is related to campaign finance law violations and/or tax evasion. That’s the part that legal experts believe is a large hurdle for him. He campaigned on a promise to “get Trump” for something. This is the best he could come up with. Chances of conviction appear to be slim but there’s no downside is this ends in acquittal or dismissal because no one who voted for him will hold his efforts to fulfill a campaign promise against him.

I understand that, I mentioned many of those points in earlier posts. The indictment doesn’t happen without the payments, didn’t feel like rewriting all the minutiae. How Bragg uses those payments to misrepresent the law is my point of contention. Campaign finance violations are federal infractions. Posting payment infractions is a state issue which has exceeded the statute of limitations. Bragg refused to attach a *statement of facts* to the indictment leaving the whole process hanging. How do you put a defendant on notice when the actual crime is left out of the arraignment, failure to include the crime that bootstraps the whole indictment is suspicious on its face. The judge should have dismissed the case outright. It stinks of election interference and political retribution.

 

[icanhelp1]

So you agree that the behavior is abhorrent and is actually where the bullshit originated
Thanks for confirming. It's refreshing to see a Republican put the blame where it belongs instead of making them a victim.

Billy boy did it while holding different offices. Just imagine an attorney general allegedly raping his staff. Dems are OK with Billy boy but need to hang Trump out to dry for far less.

 

[adrina]

Billy boy did it while holding different offices. Just imagine an attorney general allegedly raping his staff. Dems are OK with Billy boy but need to hang Trump out to dry for far less.

And ironically you are okay with Trump doing it - for the entirety of his life - but still can't let go a president's sins from 30 years ago.

Heh and you go one step further. Clinton didn't actively bully half of his constituents and denigrate them on a daily basis. But it's okay that Trump did and does. And will continue to do so.

 

[icanhelp1]

Trump shouldn't have broken the law. However given the long republican history of weaponizing the government (Clinton's BJ, endless Obama, HRC's email ad nauseum) your glass house has quite a few shattered panes.

He also shouldn't have been a bullhorn for conservative hate aimed at their fellow American citizens.

Trump amplified the hate you feel and you like that about him. You like it so much that you will vote for him again if given the opportunity. And if he is re-elected, when he goes on his tirades denigrating the very citizens of the nation he leads you will support him. You will echo him. You will encourage him.

This is you. This is modern conservatives and the reality for the vast majority of republicans.

I’m for equal application of the law and equal protection under the law.

 

[adrina]

I’m for equal application of the law and equal protection under the law.

Sure ya are.

*pats head*

 

[HisArpy]

trump pretends to be a law and order guy, but he doesn’t actually give a shit about the law unless he can use it against the other guy.

See, this is how you fuck up and not understand why.

I DO NOT CARE if someone else does or doesn't care about the law, I DO. And I support the law not the individual.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

I understand that, I mentioned many of those points in earlier posts. The indictment doesn’t happen without the payments, didn’t feel like rewriting all the minutiae. How Bragg uses those payments to misrepresent the law is my point of contention. Campaign finance violations are federal infractions. Posting payment infractions is a state issue which has exceeded the statute of limitations. Bragg refused to attach a *statement of facts* to the indictment leaving the whole process hanging. How do you put a defendant on notice when the actual crime is left out of the arraignment, failure to include the crime that bootstraps the whole indictment is suspicious on its face. The judge should have dismissed the case outright. It stinks of election interference and political retribution.

Sorry. I realize you were aware of those points. I added them for the benefit of others on this thread who were not aware. Unquestionably political shenanigans. Maybe someday Bragg will identify a victim of the alleged crimes.

 

[HisArpy]

If Trump is aquitted, then yes, it will be proof that our justice system is broken.

Proof that there is one set of rules for the rich and powerful, and a much stricter set of rules for the poor, middle class, and powerless.

One set of rules for the Republican elite, another set for the Democratic elite (remember Clinton was impeached for far lesser offenses.)

Proof that some people are above the law and can get away with anything if they are rich and powerful enough.

This should concern you, but clearly you seem more concerned about him getting indicted than NOT getting indicted, as you should be (if you believe in equal justice, which I suspect you only pretend to.)

Trump THOUGHT Barr was in his pocket, that was the issue. He thought he could buy justice the way OJ Simpson did (another case of the wealthy getting unequal justice.)

Our borders are broken? I see no problem with the Canadian border! Have you tried driving up into Canada lately? I don't live near the Mexican border so I cannot comment on that.

Biden =/= OPEC. That is the Saudis, Kuwaitis, Jordanians, and Dubai government.

No proof of inflation climbing again.

The trial court will either decide against dismissal of the charges or will allow the trial to go forward. If the trial court doesn't dismiss, the appeals court will either tell the judge to do so or will overturn the conviction. If the appeals court will not, then SCOTUS will do so.

There are 34 allegations that Trump made an entry in his bookkeeping records. That is not a crime. The 34 allegations are that the entries were about hush money payments to Stormy. Again, that's not a crime, not even a misdemeanor. Supposedly there's an allegation of state tax fraud regarding the hiding of the payments but that would require that the payments be included as a deduction on Trump's taxes, which they apparently weren't. Then there's the claim that the payments involve Federal campaign violations but those are not State offenses and cannot be brought in State court.

Then there's the fact that there is no felony offense named in the indictment, an omission which creates a fatal flaw because without the underlying felony crime, the 34 allegations cannot be bootstrapped into crimes on their own. Finally, the acts which comprise those 34 allegations are over 6 years old. The statute for misdemeanors is 2 years and felonies are 5. The indictment relies on Cuomo's exec order during the pandemic extending the statute of limitations - which may not be legal because Cuomo did not have the ability to shortcut the State Legislature per the SCOTUS, and the order would violate due process - in order to bring the charges after the statute has expired.

Yet here we have an indictment predicated on those things and you believe it's conservatives who are the ones trying to pull a fast one.

 

[Rightguide]

Actually he’s not being prosecuted for hush money payments. There is no law against that and it happens all the time. The foundation of the charges rests on falsifying business records which is a minor violation of NY state law. Bragg is attempting to bolster that into a felony by alleging the falsification was done to cover up a crime. It appears that he’ll try to prove the crime is related to campaign finance law violations and/or tax evasion. That’s the part that legal experts believe is a large hurdle for him. He campaigned on a promise to “get Trump” for something. This is the best he could come up with. Chances of conviction appear to be slim but there’s no downside is this ends in acquittal or dismissal because no one who voted for him will hold his efforts to fulfill a campaign promise against him.

The alleged "crime" Trump was supposedly covering up is not mentioned in the indictment.