HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 44,637
Yep, that and Napue v. Illinois, 1959. I'm not sure about which canon of judicial ethics such an event would violate if Bragg brought a witness he knew was going to testify falsely in support of a charge against an individual he was prosecuting.
It's not judicial ethics, it the NYSB Rules of Professional Conduct. Bragg is on the edge of violating:
DR 1-102 (4),
DR 2-109 (A)(1)
DR 2-109 (A)(2)
DR 2-110 (B)
DR 2-110 (C)
DR 7-102
DR 7-103 (A)
There may be other offenses but 7-102 and 7-103 are the worst offenses he may be committing.