Trump to be Arrested Tuesday

[Rightguide]

gawd, you had me check out his post. just... ewwwwwwwwwwwww. i feel the need to take a shower in lye after reading that.

My apologies I don't have my favorite brand of coffee this morning, but be advised, a shower in lye will enrage your whole body.

 

[jaF0]

So far the evidence is that Trump didn't incite anyone to riot. Unless you want to only believe the cherry picked evidence of the J6 committee which falsified and fabricated evidence while excluding exculpatory facts on video where Trump said to be peaceful.

Well, except all of those convicted who openly stated they did it because he told them to.

 

[Rightguide]

Has Trump been arrested yet? I sure hope so.

All it will do is create a landslide victory for Trump in 2024. It will be seen by educated Americans as a miscarriage of justice.

 

[HisArpy]

Well, except all of those convicted who openly stated they did it because he told them to.

Lol. It's like none of you even bothered to watch the video of his speech or something before you decided to convict him of saying something he never said.

 

[Rightguide]

Well, except all of those convicted who openly stated they did it because he told them to.

You talk shit all day long and swear to it, but you fool no one. Nobody is fooled anymore by the one-sided media or the lying Democrat Party except for unfortunates like yourself.

 

[HisArpy]

What a fine lawyer you must be.

GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU LITTLE PHUCKWAD

 

[Rightguide]

Let’s hope they frog-march him out of the building

He's guarded by the SS, they are not going to let him be mistreated.

 

[HisArpy]

My apologies I don't have my favorite brand of coffee this morning, but be advised, a shower in lye will enrage your whole body.

Lye is probably less corrosive than butterfat's spirit.

 

[HisArpy]

He's guarded by the SS, they are not going to let him be mistreated.

What's funny is that there's no reason for him to appear at the precinct to be arrested. If Trump decides not to fight the extradition from Florida to NY, the cops can fly to Florida, fingerprint him, take his mugshot, and secure the receipt for the bail before flying back home. He would have to appear for his arraignment but he can do that on video.

No public spectacle or risk of riots that way.

Otherwise they're going to need an arrest warrant and have Florida PD do the arrest and then extradite him to NY.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He's guarded by the SS, they are not going to let him be mistreated.

No doubt.

View attachment 2220368

 

[Sean Renaud]

The risk of riots is exactly the same either way, we just have to hope we lucked out.

 

[butters]

from yesterday

"It's just a bunch of cameras taking picture of a guy who is putting on a rat suit next to a guitar with the words Hang Fauci on it," Collins added. "This was supposed to start a half hour ago."

A short time later, Collins tweeted that the demonstration was "approaching critical mass of reporters," as he could not "even see the couple dozen people over the cameras anymore."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=2066f2e7c2634f3bc31cc63cb0dc69b6&ei=62

 

[Rightguide]

Lye is probably less corrosive than butterfat's spirit.

.

Whose posts can be accurately characterized as an intracranial coyote fight when triggered by the thought of taking down Donald Trump.

 

[jaF0]

Somebody wanna tel the LitPoliGhetttoCounselor that the US Secret Service can affect arrest warrants? You know, the ones that are tasked with staying close to the Orange Turd.

 

[Rightguide]

What's funny is that there's no reason for him to appear at the precinct to be arrested. If Trump decides not to fight the extradition from Florida to NY, the cops can fly to Florida, fingerprint him, take his mugshot, and secure the receipt for the bail before flying back home. He would have to appear for his arraignment but he can do that on video.

No public spectacle or risk of riots that way.

Otherwise they're going to need an arrest warrant and have Florida PD do the arrest and then extradite him to NY.

Which politically won't make DeSantis look any better to the GOP either. I see Rand Paul is calling for the arrest and jailing of Bragg.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/abuse-power-alvin-bragg/2023/03/21/id/1112871/

 

[Sean Renaud]

Lol.

So far the evidence is that Trump didn't incite anyone to riot. Unless you want to only believe the cherry picked evidence of the J6 committee which falsified and fabricated evidence while excluding exculpatory facts on video where Trump said to be peaceful.

If Trump is guilty of "stealing" classified docs, then so is Biden to the tune of decades worth of that kind of thing. Not to mention Hillary doing it too. Yet I've NEVER seen you come out and say they should go to prison for it.

Broke the law over the Stormy Daniels settlement? Is that anything like Hunter's laptop? Or the video where Biden talked about quid pro quo with Ukraine over the prosecutor which was going to put his criminal son in prison? Or the fabricated evidence of Russian Collusion? Where's your poison laced outcry against those things?

Basically it comes down to you having TDS like the rest of the progressive crowd. You want to put Trump in prison because he's Trump, not because he's committed a crime you can prove beyond a reasonalbe doubt based on actual evidence rather than spittle and bile.

The evidence that Trump incited a riot is pretty fucking solid. ITs not cherry picked data, if anything they leave a lot of stuff on the table.

No Biden and Hillary are not guilty of the same crimes. I don't care if they go down for what they did do, but its not the same crime.

The Hunter Laptop is misinformation. The Russian collusion was all but proven by Mueller. So there's that.

Call it TDS, we must NEVER forget or forgive what has happened here. A reasonable doubt simply is not an acceptable standard here, we need to do like we do with everybody else where "Good enough" is enough.

 

[Paul_Chance]

Being Federal Law Enforcement, the Secret Service can only arrest individuals for federal charges. In general, federal forces cannot arrest on state charges. Even the US Marshals Service and the FBI, when arresting criminals in another state, are actually arresting them based on the underlying Federal charge, and then turning them over to state based authorities.

 

[butters]

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA18T7lB.img?w=800&h=415&q=60&m=2&f=jpg

 

[ll74]

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA18T7lB.img?w=800&h=415&q=60&m=2&f=jpg

The actual using money to settle a case is not illegal. Where the money came from is the subject of the criminal act. (Expected, though until the indictment is known, this is still speculation)

 

[butters]

another dodgy phone call by trump?

A bomb threat was called into a lower Manhattan court on Tuesday just before a judge was set to hear a $250 million lawsuit against former President Trump.

The threat was investigated by police and the courthouse was closed and searched, with authorities finding that the threat was unfounded, according to court spokesman Lucian Chalfen, who confirmed the news to Bloomberg.

that's the inflated real estate values case
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=2066f2e7c2634f3bc31cc63cb0dc69b6&ei=90

 

[icanhelp1]

All it will do is create a landslide victory for Trump in 2024. It will be seen by educated Americans as a miscarriage of justice.

You talk shit all day long and swear to it, but you fool no one. Nobody is fooled anymore by the one-sided media or the lying Democrat Party except for unfortunates like yourself.

If you put some thought into how things could work out if Trump is indicted, it’s the same old same old. First the indictment and that process, perhaps 3 weeks out. Trump plead not guilty. It then proceeds to the selection of a prosecutor and trial judge. Then after some deliberation the trial judge establishes the trial dates. I would bet that all these events will take us well into the 2024 election season. Let’s just say for shits and giggles the trial starts around Mar. Apr. time frame, that would make it the third time the democrats get away with using the justice system to influence, interfere with either a presidential or midterm elections.

 

[Rightguide]

The Legally and Morally Flawed Case Against Trump​

Philip Holloway | Mar 20, 2023

Although we don’t yet know entirely how it will be structured, enough of the Manhattan District Attorney’s case against Trump has found its way into the public domain so that we know the general parameters. The centerpiece of the case is a misdemeanor charge under Section 175 for supposedly falsifying his business records. The theory is that Trump paid his former lawyer $130,000.00 in a series of reimbursements to Cohen and labeled them as legal expenses to conceal that the money was really to pay Adult Film Actress, Stormy Daniels for a nondisclosure agreement and that somehow this scheme violated federal election laws. From a legal perspective, this bizarre wielding of State prosecutorial power in pursuit of what is essentially an alleged federal crime is seriously flawed.

For starters, it is not a crime to be a philanderer, if in fact Trump did have an affair with Ms. Daniels. She has claimed publicly that there was no affair – but who knows. It is not a crime for Trump to pay so-called “hush money” either. I hate it when people call it that. It is a legal contract called a “nondisclosure agreement” and it is not in the least uncommon. Particularly for a celebrity who is a married man with many business interests. There are myriad reasons – unrelated to his Presidential Campaign – for Trump to pay the money to Ms. Daniels.

It’s worth noting that the Federal Elections Commission and the Department of Justice have already looked at all this and took no action back when it was fresh. Nevertheless DA Bragg is essentially trying to stuff a federal campaign finance crime into a state law business records charge. The business records case under Section 175 is a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations is two years. If DA Bragg manages to shoehorn an alleged violation of the federal campaign finance laws into the Section 175 charge – despite being a state DA and not a US Attorney – then the business records case becomes a felony and has a five-year statute of limitations. My iPhone tells me this is 2023 – nearly seven years after any such Section 175 business record crime would have occurred. So, the statute of limitations has clearly run. Nevertheless, I wait on pins and needles to see what whackado legal theory DA Bragg pulls out of his…..hat to claim the statute of limitations has somehow not expired.

More here: https://townhall.com/columnists/phi...p-is-flawed-both-legally-and-morally-n2620881

There is no historical precedent for a prosecution of this nature against anyone, especially against a former President of the United States.

 

[DeluxAuto]

All it will do is create a landslide victory for Trump in 2024. It will be seen by educated Americans as a miscarriage of justice.

Was that hard to type with your head so far up Trump's ass?

 

[ll74]

The Legally and Morally Flawed Case Against Trump​

Philip Holloway | Mar 20, 2023

Although we don’t yet know entirely how it will be structured, enough of the Manhattan District Attorney’s case against Trump has found its way into the public domain so that we know the general parameters. The centerpiece of the case is a misdemeanor charge under Section 175 for supposedly falsifying his business records. The theory is that Trump paid his former lawyer $130,000.00 in a series of reimbursements to Cohen and labeled them as legal expenses to conceal that the money was really to pay Adult Film Actress, Stormy Daniels for a nondisclosure agreement and that somehow this scheme violated federal election laws. From a legal perspective, this bizarre wielding of State prosecutorial power in pursuit of what is essentially an alleged federal crime is seriously flawed.

For starters, it is not a crime to be a philanderer, if in fact Trump did have an affair with Ms. Daniels. She has claimed publicly that there was no affair – but who knows. It is not a crime for Trump to pay so-called “hush money” either. I hate it when people call it that. It is a legal contract called a “nondisclosure agreement” and it is not in the least uncommon. Particularly for a celebrity who is a married man with many business interests. There are myriad reasons – unrelated to his Presidential Campaign – for Trump to pay the money to Ms. Daniels.

It’s worth noting that the Federal Elections Commission and the Department of Justice have already looked at all this and took no action back when it was fresh. Nevertheless DA Bragg is essentially trying to stuff a federal campaign finance crime into a state law business records charge. The business records case under Section 175 is a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations is two years. If DA Bragg manages to shoehorn an alleged violation of the federal campaign finance laws into the Section 175 charge – despite being a state DA and not a US Attorney – then the business records case becomes a felony and has a five-year statute of limitations. My iPhone tells me this is 2023 – nearly seven years after any such Section 175 business record crime would have occurred. So, the statute of limitations has clearly run. Nevertheless, I wait on pins and needles to see what whackado legal theory DA Bragg pulls out of his…..hat to claim the statute of limitations has somehow not expired.

More here: https://townhall.com/columnists/phi...p-is-flawed-both-legally-and-morally-n2620881

There is no historical precedent for a prosecution of this nature against anyone, especially against a former President of the United States.

New things happen all the time.

 

[Rightguide]

If you put some thought into how things could work out if Trump is indicted, it’s the same old same old. First the indictment and that process, perhaps 3 weeks out. Trump plead not guilty. It then proceeds to the selection of a prosecutor and trial judge. Then after some deliberation the trial judge establishes the trial dates. I would bet that all these events will take us well into the 2024 election season. Let’s just say for shits and giggles the trial starts around Mar. Apr. time frame, that would make it the third time the democrats get away with using the justice system to influence, interfere with either a presidential or midterm elections.

Democrats are pushing the limits of the law and decency toward the breaking point. One wonders where all of this will take us. The Deep State leftists who are behind this attack on our election process and the assault on our economy are evil people with evil intent. Now that the left and its constituency are ignoring the law to advance their agenda what happens when the rest of America decides to do the same? It won't be pretty.