Trump to be Arrested Tuesday

[LeeKee]

I just don't care about this in the slightest

I still don't believe he'll ever be found guilty nor sentenced and instead this will just drag on in the courts. The result will be trumpies sounding the alarm of political prosecution and non trumpies crying because he is never found guilty......ad infinitum.

He has too much money and power to let the courts touch him. (Biden would be a similar case if he were prosecuted - not that I agree or disagree that he should be)

I just hope that maga heads don't use this as a reason to advance their bullshit civil war angle....because that would suck.

There isnt going to be a civil war. Who honestly believes military personnel will kit up start engaging each other? It will be street level thuggery and terrorists doing chicken shit attacks on each other. The „media“ will hyper ventilate and shit them selves and cast the angles. All nonsense either way. „Wag the dog“ type horseshit we see everyday now.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You have a faith that I and former generals lack.

 

[Lazaran]

You'll be booked, finger printed, photographed.

That ^ is excellent.

The “perp walk” for the corrupt orange traitor will be the voluntary walk to the booking, fingerprinting, and photographing.

That ^ is good enough for me……….for now.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Nobody knows exactly what Trump might be charged with other that it probably involves payment of hush money to Stormy Daniels. The Wall Street Journal mentions a possible low level felony version of a NY state law that would not involve federal authorities, does not require prison time, and comes with significant legal hurdles for prosecutors. In other words, yet another chapter in a long stream of disappointments for those who have been praying for Trump to be locked up.

“The precise charges that the prosecutors are considering aren’t known, but the office has looked at charging Mr. Trump with a felony version of a state offense for falsifying business records. The offense is a low-level felony that carries no requirement of prison time. Charging that offense as a felony requires connecting it to another crime, which could bring a host of legal challenges for prosecutors.”

 

[DeluxAuto]

View attachment 2219788

You overlook the fact that he's admitted groomer of girls of a certain age because he wears a stupid hat.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

You really are either seriously fucking stupid, deranged, or a just a pot stirring bitch. Or maybe you are all 3.

I just posted I do not want trump as the republican candidate.

Then why get so angry, trumptard?

 

[Holy_Seduction]

There isnt going to be a civil war.

The ruling classes of the world would much rather see the little peoples of the earth systematically destroy each other than see them coming systematically after the ruling classes.

 

[icanhelp1]

That could be a huge tactical error. He's a has been. Arresting him now could be enough campaign boost. The DA would be playing with dynamite.

If by DA you mean (D)UMB (A)SS I agree.

 

[DeluxAuto]

If by DA you mean (D)UMB (A)SS I agree.

Right. An internet porn board whiner is much better at being a DA than an actual DA.

The hubris of this moron.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nobody knows exactly what Trump might be charged with other that it probably involves payment of hush money to Stormy Daniels. The Wall Street Journal mentions a possible low level felony version of a NY state law that would not involve federal authorities, does not require prison time, and comes with significant legal hurdles for prosecutors. In other words, yet another chapter in a long stream of disappointments for those who have been praying for Trump to be locked up.

“The precise charges that the prosecutors are considering aren’t known, but the office has looked at charging Mr. Trump with a felony version of a state offense for falsifying business records. The offense is a low-level felony that carries no requirement of prison time. Charging that offense as a felony requires connecting it to another crime, which could bring a host of legal challenges for prosecutors.”

Identify the man then find a crime. When our justice system goes south so goes our country. An NDA is a contract that I’m sure many politicians have exercised that right.

 

[Rightguide]

If by DA you mean (D)UMB (A)SS I agree.

A Friggin' Ghetto lawyer who can't figure out that he can't turn a state misdemeanor into a federal felony and can't prosecute it as such either. This is the same bullshit prosecution the DOJ and the Federal District Attorney for the Southern District of New York walked away from. No one in history has been tried under his uniquely retarded legal concept to "get" Donald Trump. In addition election laws involving a presidential election are federal laws.

Manhattan DA's Trump case rests on shaky legal, ethical ground, experts say​

Ordinarily, such a charge would be considered a misdemeanor and come with a two-year statue of limitation.
By Ben Whedon

Updated: March 18, 2023 - 11:27pm

Trump's attorney, Joe Tacopina has argued that Trump's payment to Cohen was in fact a legitimate legal fee. Trump, he noted, never directly paid Daniels any money. Rather, he only paid his own lawyer for services rendered, i.e. legal fees.

"The payments were made to a lawyer, not to Stormy Daniels," Tacopina said last week on MSNBC. "The payments were made to Donald Trump's lawyer, which would be considered legal fees. Michael Cohen ... was his lawyer at the time and advised him that this was the proper way to do this to protect himself and his family from embarrassment. It's as simple as that."

As a hush money payment to ensure silence about an affair would not be illegal in and of itself, Bragg's case would likely hinge on a possible campaign finance violation. If Cohen's payment to Daniels constituted an illegal campaign contribution, then the falsification of records would have concealed an underlying crime, providing legal predicate for a Class E felony charge of first degree falsifying business records. Trump would face up to four years in prison if convicted on the charge.

Bragg, therefore, needs to demonstrate that the payments occurred specifically with the intent to affect the election, a prospect Turley called "extremely difficult," given the myriad other legitimate reasons Trump might have for wanting to keep an alleged affair out of the spotlight.

The rest here: https://justthenews.com/government/...se-rests-shaky-legal-ground-legal-experts-say

"Turley" quoted above refers to the renowned Democrat law Professor Jonathon Turley of George Town University.

 

[ll74]

A Friggin' Ghetto lawyer who can't figure out that he can't turn a state misdemeanor into a federal felony and can't prosecute it as such either. This is the same bullshit prosecution the DOJ and the Federal District Attorney for the Southern District of New York walked away from. No one in history has been tried under his uniquely retarded legal concept to "get" Donald Trump. In addition election laws involving a presidential election are federal laws.

Manhattan DA's Trump case rests on shaky legal, ethical ground, experts say​

Ordinarily, such a charge would be considered a misdemeanor and come with a two-year statue of limitation.
By Ben Whedon

Updated: March 18, 2023 - 11:27pm

Trump's attorney, Joe Tacopina has argued that Trump's payment to Cohen was in fact a legitimate legal fee. Trump, he noted, never directly paid Daniels any money. Rather, he only paid his own lawyer for services rendered, i.e. legal fees.

"The payments were made to a lawyer, not to Stormy Daniels," Tacopina said last week on MSNBC. "The payments were made to Donald Trump's lawyer, which would be considered legal fees. Michael Cohen ... was his lawyer at the time and advised him that this was the proper way to do this to protect himself and his family from embarrassment. It's as simple as that."

As a hush money payment to ensure silence about an affair would not be illegal in and of itself, Bragg's case would likely hinge on a possible campaign finance violation. If Cohen's payment to Daniels constituted an illegal campaign contribution, then the falsification of records would have concealed an underlying crime, providing legal predicate for a Class E felony charge of first degree falsifying business records. Trump would face up to four years in prison if convicted on the charge.

Bragg, therefore, needs to demonstrate that the payments occurred specifically with the intent to affect the election, a prospect Turley called "extremely difficult," given the myriad other legitimate reasons Trump might have for wanting to keep an alleged affair out of the spotlight.

The rest here: https://justthenews.com/government/...se-rests-shaky-legal-ground-legal-experts-say

"Turley" quoted above refers to the renowned Democrat law Professor Jonathon Turley of George Town University.

Paying off a mistress in some way tied to campaign funds is a pretty clear no-no. Whether they can prove that he did is questionable.

The fact that he blatantly did it and nobody who supports him seems to care is odd.

Just as calling the State House leader and secretary of state to tell them to find votes is blatant.

He does stupid shit openly and then blames others for calling him out on it. That's 45's MO. Defend him all you want.

 

[DeluxAuto]

A Friggin' Ghetto lawyer

What is a "ghetto lawyer" and why on earth would you call him that?



Oh. I see.

And why capitalize "Ghetto?"

 

[JohnEngelman]

That could be a huge tactical error. He's a has been. Arresting him now could be enough campaign boost. The DA would be playing with dynamite.

CNBC MAR 15 202

Quinnipiac University’s latest survey of Republican and Republican-leaning voters found Trump winning 46% of support in a hypothetical GOP primary field, with DeSantis receiving 32%.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/15/2024-gop-primary-polls-trump-grows-lead-over-desantis.html

-----------

Newsweek, 3/12/23

Polls by Redfield and Wilton Strategies and Premise show the race for the White House is incredibly tight with only a few percentage points separating the two.

https://www.newsweek.com/how-trump-bidens-chances-look-latest-2024-polling-1787152

 

[phrodeau]

As a hush money payment to ensure silence about an affair would not be illegal in and of itself, Bragg's case would likely hinge on a possible campaign finance violation.

This is truth to you?

 

[icanhelp1]

A Friggin' Ghetto lawyer who can't figure out that he can't turn a state misdemeanor into a federal felony and can't prosecute it as such either. This is the same bullshit prosecution the DOJ and the Federal District Attorney for the Southern District of New York walked away from. No one in history has been tried under his uniquely retarded legal concept to "get" Donald Trump. In addition election laws involving a presidential election are federal laws.

Manhattan DA's Trump case rests on shaky legal, ethical ground, experts say​

Ordinarily, such a charge would be considered a misdemeanor and come with a two-year statue of limitation.
By Ben Whedon

Updated: March 18, 2023 - 11:27pm

Trump's attorney, Joe Tacopina has argued that Trump's payment to Cohen was in fact a legitimate legal fee. Trump, he noted, never directly paid Daniels any money. Rather, he only paid his own lawyer for services rendered, i.e. legal fees.

"The payments were made to a lawyer, not to Stormy Daniels," Tacopina said last week on MSNBC. "The payments were made to Donald Trump's lawyer, which would be considered legal fees. Michael Cohen ... was his lawyer at the time and advised him that this was the proper way to do this to protect himself and his family from embarrassment. It's as simple as that."

As a hush money payment to ensure silence about an affair would not be illegal in and of itself, Bragg's case would likely hinge on a possible campaign finance violation. If Cohen's payment to Daniels constituted an illegal campaign contribution, then the falsification of records would have concealed an underlying crime, providing legal predicate for a Class E felony charge of first degree falsifying business records. Trump would face up to four years in prison if convicted on the charge.

Bragg, therefore, needs to demonstrate that the payments occurred specifically with the intent to affect the election, a prospect Turley called "extremely difficult," given the myriad other legitimate reasons Trump might have for wanting to keep an alleged affair out of the spotlight.

The rest here: https://justthenews.com/government/...se-rests-shaky-legal-ground-legal-experts-say

"Turley" quoted above refers to the renowned Democrat law Professor Jonathon Turley of George Town University.

Nothing more than left wing zealots using the justice system to further their leftist Marxist agenda. It’s unfortunate that the left is OK with this brand of kangaroo justice while the media satiate another sugar high. SAD!

 

[Rightguide]

I didn't miss it. He lied about getting a BJ under oath. Should he have owned it? Probably. Pretending that asking and digging to prove he got a BJ wasn't about preventing Gore from winning via smearing Clinton is full bullshit. He was punished for a BJ. Funny thing is while we found out too late 2000 really WAS a stolen election.

He was punished for violating federal law and politically for conduct unbecoming of a president. Oh, and the election was never stolen in 2000, that is a proven fact, your fantasies notwithstanding. I posted the evidence a couple of years ago. Go look it up.

 

[Rightguide]

Elon Musk Warns Trump Indictment Will Backfire, Predicts ‘Landslide’ Reelection​

By Lorenz Duchamps
March 18, 2023Updated: March 18, 2023

Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Saturday predicted that former President Donald Trump will be reelected in a “landslide victory” if he is to be indicted next week by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

Musk’s comment was in response to a Fox News segment that detailed how the Manhattan DA’s office reportedly requested a meeting with law enforcement officials to discuss “security preparations” and whether to “handcuff” and “fingerprint” the former president when escorting him into the courtroom.

“If this happens, Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory,” the owner of Twitter and the world’s richest man wrote in the comment section of the post.

More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/elon-...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

Like I said, Democrats always go too far and expose themselves.

 

[phrodeau]

Scott Adams called the Manhattan DA’s case “pathetic.” I wonder who told him what the case is.

 

[ll74]

Elon Musk Warns Trump Indictment Will Backfire, Predicts ‘Landslide’ Reelection​

By Lorenz Duchamps
March 18, 2023Updated: March 18, 2023

Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Saturday predicted that former President Donald Trump will be reelected in a “landslide victory” if he is to be indicted next week by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

Musk’s comment was in response to a Fox News segment that detailed how the Manhattan DA’s office reportedly requested a meeting with law enforcement officials to discuss “security preparations” and whether to “handcuff” and “fingerprint” the former president when escorting him into the courtroom.

“If this happens, Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory,” the owner of Twitter and the world’s richest man wrote in the comment section of the post.

More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/elon-...utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

Like I said, Democrats always go to far and expose themselves.

Is there a reason why Elon's opinion is important to you?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Identify the man then find a crime. When our justice system goes south so goes our country. An NDA is a contract that I’m sure many politicians have exercised that right.

Nancy Pelosi issued a statement suggesting Trump just made up his announcement to get attention. She could be right. Not sure anyone in the know has confirmed or denied Trumps claim of an imminent arrest.

We do know that Manhattan DA Bragg and a grand jury have been working on building a case against Trump. UVA law professor Jonathan Turely and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy are skeptical about the legal merits. The WSJ report doesn’t give Never Trumpers much reason for hope either.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Is there a reason why Elon's opinion is important to you?

LOL. Musk was his mortal enemy until 2022.

 

[ll74]

LOL. Musk was his mortal enemy until 2022.

It's the "successful businessman thing that gives him a hard on.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nancy Pelosi issued a statement suggesting Trump just made up his announcement to get attention. She could be right. Not sure anyone in the know has confirmed or denied Trumps claim of an imminent arrest.

We do know that Manhattan DA Bragg and a grand jury have been working on building a case against Trump. UVA law professor Jonathan Turely and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy are skeptical about the legal merits. The WSJ report doesn’t give Never Trumpers much reason for hope either.

I watched them both this morning. Like Trump could get a fair shake from a NY grand jury panel? Leftist Politics plays a big part in NY, DC jurisprudence.

 

[DeluxAuto]

It's the "successful businessman thing that gives him a hard on.

To be fair, Musk has about a dozen fewer bankruptcies than Trump.