It's "Twitter Freedom Friday!"

[HisArpy]

So dumb I didn't even bother responding, and full of lies. He won't look at the data that proves him wrong. Idiot!

You sound and act like David Hogg on the subject of falsified gun data. He also just got schooled on it and can't figure out why. Just like you in this thread.

 

[oggbashan]

You have been schooled on gun restrictions multiple times but you still claim they have no effect.

What does that make you? Unteachable.

 

[HisArpy]

You have been schooled on gun restrictions multiple times but you still claim they have no effect.

What does that make you? Unteachable.

Your beliefs based on lies you like the sound of are not facts. Your opinions based on your beliefs are not truth. The data you use is falsified in order to make it sound good to those who want to believe in it.

The idea that you can only take the guns out of the hands of criminals is pure fantasy on a level only children can believe in. It is not worthy of an adult human being because it lacks any semblance of logic.

Yet here you are hawking the idea as if it's feasible and expecting to not get any push back over it.

Which is also not worthy of an adult human being because it too lacks any semblance of logic.

You're a fool who believes he can go to his grave safely because he put others into danger in order to keep himself safe from his own fears. What a damned lily livered coward you turned out to be in the end.

 

[ll74]

This thread has taken more turns than NASCAR.

 

[oggbashan]

^ HisArpy post above. What a load of justification for someone who will not look at data because it proves him wrong. All laws are useless becasue criminals will not obey them. Duh! That's what makes them criminals, dolt!

It's all a conspiracy. I hope he's got his tinfoil hat on.

 

[HisArpy]

^ HisArpy post above. What a load of justification for someone who will not look at data because it proves him wrong. All laws are useless becasue criminals will not obey them. Duh! That's what makes them criminals, dolt!

It's all a conspiracy. I hope he's got his tinfoil hat on.

I look at the data all the time because part of my law practice is in this area.

The difference between you and I (and the rest of the bullshitters) is that I know how much the data is falsified. I also know the psychometrics involved in the bullshit behind the gun grabs.

What you want is to disarm the innocent. You tell them it's for their own good but the reality is that you make the innocent into victims of both the criminals who have no desire to obey your diktats and YOUR selfish desires.

And you do it under the rubric of trying to keep YOURSELF "safe" from violent crime while making the victims of violent crime even worse off because YOU STOLE their ability to defend themselves.

You put yourself above their actual safety with words designed to appease those who are like minded to your goal while undercutting those opposed to the usurpation of their rights as human beings.

And then you come here and LIE YOUR FUCKING ASS OFF about it in an effort to justify the evil you're doing to other people.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Derpy with the dumbdumb doubledown.

 

[oggbashan]

Derpy with the dumbdumb doubledown.

Probably triple or quadruple.

Why won't he look at the data for the UK, Australia or New Zealand?

Because they prove him a liar.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Probably triple or quadruple.

Why won't he look at the data for the UK, Australia or New Zealand?

Because they prove him a liar.

Or Canada for that matter.

No HisArpy is letting himself die on the same hill, over and over. Repetitive to 9th integer.

He fails math for sure, no one who ever passed any high school mathematics course with any measure of Statistics in the course curriculum understands this.

more /= less risk. No matter the item. Cars, Guns, people, roads etc etc.

Also I am getting bored with his claim, this is about "taking away everyone's guns". No it is about sane and sensible limits and controls on what the general public can, or cannot own.

 

[LLCox]

Never been on twatter, Instagram, tic tok, fakebook.... I have to wade through enough BS as it is.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Never been on twatter, Instagram, tic tok, fakebook.... I have to wade through enough BS as it is.

I cut out the BS in my real life so I can laugh at the unfortunate on those platforms like I do here

 

[Chernosoth]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1612584399417008130

"I wish I was a COVID conspiracy theorist early on instead if getting vaccinated. I'm in heart failure. The conspiracy theorists are doing just fine."

 

[oggbashan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1612584399417008130

"I wish I was a COVID conspiracy theorist early on instead if getting vaccinated. I'm in heart failure. The conspiracy theorists are doing just fine."

Except for the million+ dead US citizens from Covid.

 

[LLCox]

I cut out the BS in my real life so I can life at the unfortunate on those platforms like I do here

That must take a lot of time, they ain't worth it.

DeluxAuto = great user name.

 

[DeluxAuto]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1612584399417008130

"I wish I was a COVID conspiracy theorist early on instead if getting vaccinated. I'm in heart failure. The conspiracy theorists are doing just fine."

I wish the whiny simp was a conspiracy theorist too so we wouldn't have to read his whiny BS.

 

[HisArpy]

Probably triple or quadruple.

Why won't he look at the data for the UK, Australia or New Zealand?

Because they prove him a liar.

I do. I usually discount the data from those places because they lack a 2nd Amendment, but for discussion with people from other nations that the USA, that data is relevant.

Unfortunately it doesn't show what you want it to show despite you getting all foamy mouthed over it.

In general terms, gun bans do not reduce gun VIOLENCE. They do reduce accidental gun deaths but that's not the same thing as gun violence. In order to cover up that fact, the orgs which compile the data lump everything into 1 category.

From there, the data fails to show that the root cause of gun violence isn't guns, it's violence. Take away the gun and you still have violence.

Worse, the data fails to include defensive gun usage because the anti-gun orgs have successfully lobbied to completely remove that data from the official reports on gun violence.

Which means that the data you rely upon to try and prove your point has been FALSIFIED. Yet you tout it as valid because you don't know/care that it's all built on lies.

The question is why. Toward which I have offered a possible reason. Cowardice.

 

[oggbashan]

HisArpy is still riding his broken down horse again.

The gun laws in thise four countries have massively reduced gun violence, but he won't accept that.

Sad single-minded asshole clutching his useless gun.

PS The UK never had the second amendment. Until 1920 anyone in the UK could own any sort of firearm. In 1920 anyone owning a firearm had to register with the police who could (but rarely did) refuse permission. You had to give reason for owning a irearm - pest control, belonging to a gun club were acceptable. Having a weapon for 'personal protection' was specifically outlawed. If you put that on your application, it would be refused.

The UK lack of firearms in 1940 was not because so few guns were personally owned - it was because so many army rifles had been lost at Dunkirk. The Germans were able to equip a battilion with British rifles.

 

[Chernosoth]

Except for the million+ dead US citizens from Covid.

Or from medical malpractice. Doctors, hospital administrators, and government officials may prefer to avoid that subject in congressional investigations and criminal trials. But that million is still just a drop in the bucket that is starting to fill with died suddenlys.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

HisArpy is still riding his broken down horse again.

The gun laws in thise four countries have massively reduced gun violence, but he won't accept that.

Sad single-minded asshole clutching his useless gun.

PS The UK never had the second amendment. Until 1920 anyone in the UK could own any sort of firearm. In 1920 anyone owning a firearm had to register with the police who could (but rarely did) refuse permission. You had to give reason for owning a irearm - pest control, belonging to a gun club were acceptable. Having a weapon for 'personal protection' was specifically outlawed. If you put that on your application, it would be refused.

The UK lack of firearms in 1940 was not because so few guns were personally owned - it was because so many army rifles had been lost at Dunkirk. The Germans were able to equip a battilion with British rifles.

What HisArpy fails to grasp is: Gun owners in the US are not the majority, in fact it is closer to 30% than 50%. So they are not a majority. Though the owners do reside in enough states as a majority to over ride a constitutional amendment, repealing 2A currently.

That said, there is now a full generation coming to the age of voting, who went to school and experienced first hand the emotions of the rapid increase in mass shootings since the early 2000's. This generation is not so keen on "assault style weapons". Since they have heard/seen/practised mass shooting scenarios. Soon ( ten years or less) they will be voting, and they may not like the idea of people having those weapons. They soon may become the majority, and then a constitutional amendment might become a reality.

Let us also not forget, that right now, the new generation in school is also experiencing this.

His own stubbornness to even enter the debate about what types of firearms the general population should be able to own, and the type of training that should be mandatory prior to ownership may doom the 2A in the long run. Which is a pretty stupid,"biting your own nose to spite your own face" stance.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Or from medical malpractice. Doctors, hospital administrators, and government officials may prefer to avoid that subject in congressional investigations and criminal trials. But that million is still just a drop in the bucket that is starting to fill with died suddenlys.

Everybody dies idiot, some suddenly.

COVID vaccines have not caused some "spike" in "sudden deaths" anywhere in the world, the US included.

 

[oggbashan]

And medical malpractice is very rare in the US. Doctors' insurers insist on a battery of tests that would be unnecessary in other countries just to protect the doctors from the ambulance chasing lawyers.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1614715493507805184

 

[HisArpy]

What HisArpy fails to grasp is: Gun owners in the US are not the majority, in fact it is closer to 30% than 50%. So they are not a majority. Though the owners do reside in enough states as a majority to over ride a constitutional amendment, repealing 2A currently.

That said, there is now a full generation coming to the age of voting, who went to school and experienced first hand the emotions of the rapid increase in mass shootings since the early 2000's. This generation is not so keen on "assault style weapons". Since they have heard/seen/practised mass shooting scenarios. Soon ( ten years or less) they will be voting, and they may not like the idea of people having those weapons. They soon may become the majority, and then a constitutional amendment might become a reality.

Let us also not forget, that right now, the new generation in school is also experiencing this.

Ahh, the tyranny of the majority masquerading as democracy rides again. This mindless stupidity is why we have a Constitution and why that Constitution has a 2nd Amendment.

His own stubbornness to even enter the debate about what types of firearms the general population should be able to own, and the type of training that should be mandatory prior to ownership may doom the 2A in the long run. Which is a pretty stupid,"biting your own nose to spite your own face" stance.

It's not a Bill of "should be able to's." And if training is required to exercise a right, when are you going to stand up for "voter education" classes?

Your arguments are ridiculous because they aren't based in either logic or the real world. Instead, you follow the lead of tyrants out of spite against those who wish to be free of your diktats and oppression.

 

[HisArpy]

HisArpy is still riding his broken down horse again.

The gun laws in thise four countries have massively reduced gun violence, but he won't accept that.

Sad single-minded asshole clutching his useless gun.

PS The UK never had the second amendment. Until 1920 anyone in the UK could own any sort of firearm. In 1920 anyone owning a firearm had to register with the police who could (but rarely did) refuse permission. You had to give reason for owning a irearm - pest control, belonging to a gun club were acceptable. Having a weapon for 'personal protection' was specifically outlawed. If you put that on your application, it would be refused.

The UK lack of firearms in 1940 was not because so few guns were personally owned - it was because so many army rifles had been lost at Dunkirk. The Germans were able to equip a battilion with British rifles.

The gun laws haven't done anything. Murder is still a thing and it's still being done with firearms. Mass shootings still happen even in countries with gun bans. They aren't even "less" because mass shootings aren't all that common.

But, in order to portray guns as "bad" the data is intentionally skewed to include non relevant events all lumped together and labeled "gun violence." And then the counter data which would prove this to be the case is deleted from the final reports.

This is intentional data fraud but it's supported by those who would use the falsified data as a weapon against those who refuse to bend the knee to overlords who lie and cheat them out of their humanity.

What is behind it is a desire by a certain faction to rid the populace of the ability to fight back against the tyrannical. The long game is to first pacify the population, then dispossess them of their weapons on the basis that they don't need them and it's for their own good.

This has always been the way of Europe and the old world which was created and maintained on the backs of the serfs who were left with nothing after the ruling class took it all from them as "their due." Their food, their money, their lives, the ruling class took it all and left the people with nothing. China and Japan also followed that model, taking it even further and proclaiming that their rulers were "gods" in an of themselves. China today is still doing it with the Ughurs as slaves, population controls, poverty, theft, punishments, and death. They're even holding onto the entire "I'm a god" thing for their emperor-president.

America stands as a place where the oppressed can be free. That you and your government don't allow that is why America exists in the first place.

That's history. That's fact. That you refuse to see or acknowledge that "your way" is the wrong way only illustrates how out of touch you are. We are not you. Our country is greater than yours. Our people are stronger than yours. We are not afraid. Unlike you and yours.

You would do better to be more like the people of Ukraine than those in the UK because they're willing to fight while all you want to do is roll over and submit to your betters and masters.

 

[phrodeau]

Murder is still a thing

And the Ten Commandments aren’t worth the tablets they’re carved on.