Chaotic Coffee Klatch (tea also available)

@BrendaD if you think otherwise, I would appreciate you go to the trouble of pointing out when I did so.
If you would like, I can point out in the future if you have moved from friendly banter into confronting or overly aggressive (which many of us find very unpleasant) talk, but I will not go through back messages. They were unpleasant the first time, I won’t go back there again. Sorry.
 
If you would like, I can point out in the future if you have moved from friendly banter into confronting or overly aggressive (which many of us find very unpleasant) talk, but I will not go through back messages. They were unpleasant the first time, I won’t go back there again. Sorry.
I'm ignoring him also. He is the first one!
 
I step away for dinner and I find head-whacking going on when I return?

I feel that I was denied critical, need-to-know, information!

Under the right circumstances, I am kind of fond of a little head-whacking.
 
I'm afraid to ask what van?
The van we use to take people to movies, Wolfie's van!
If you would like, I can point out in the future if you have moved from friendly banter into confronting or overly aggressive (which many of us find very unpleasant) talk, but I will not go through back messages. They were unpleasant the first time, I won’t go back there again. Sorry.
You are too kind mistress
 
If you would like, I can point out in the future if you have moved from friendly banter into confronting or overly aggressive (which many of us find very unpleasant) talk, but I will not go through back messages. They were unpleasant the first time, I won’t go back there again. Sorry.
I fully understand that. My point is I did not start the aggressive posturing. Only returned it. I will concede that is no justification for it. There should be a block function on this platform, mebe……
 
I step away for dinner and I find head-whacking going on when I return?

I feel that I was denied critical, need-to-know, information!

Under the right circumstances, I am kind of fond of a little head-whacking.
I'm fond of the other end whacking
 
When I came back I saw this thread and started posting in it a little and watching it. Mostly because a few old friends and aquaintances posted here quite a bit (who I won't specifically name in case they want plausible deniability! ;) :D ).

I have to admit that I chuckled a little at the name "Chaos" both because I got the tongue in cheek reference to what happens in most Lit threads of this nature, but also because I thought "yeah, chaos...lmao...they don't *really* know what that means." Keeping in mind that - back when I was young and could actually do mathematics, - I did some work in Chaos theory (not much, I was never *that* good).

But as I've watched, I've reached a new level of appreciation for the aptness of this thread name.

One formal definition of "Chaos" is called Weak Sensitive Dependence and it says: A system characterized by J(x(t)) has the property of weak sensitive dependence on its initial conditions if and only if ∃ε>0 ∀x(0) ∀δ>0 ∃t>0 ∃y(0) so that if |x(0)−y(0)|<δ and |J(x(t))−J(y(t))|>ε.

(I put that in just to be obnoxious, to prove that I can read math fluently, and because...well...it contributes to the chaos! How many other Lit threads have ∀ and ∃ in them!).
In simple terms it says that no matter how close two starting values (x(0) and y(0)) may be, after a sufficient time (t), the system J will lead to J(x(t)) and J(y(t) being "far away". I think clearly we can apply this definition here given how quickly the posts evolve into total weirdness! ;)

I'm thinking, you know...maybe there's a paper here... But getting this past IRB is going to be a bitch....
I'm not great at science or math, but I started the original thread because of the havoc some of us were wreaking in other threads. Havoc didn't sound as fun as chaos. 😂
 
Damn you are a man of many talents. 😋
I dunno about “many”. I do know how, and love, to cook and bake.
I'm afraid to ask what van?
Mine.
If you would like, I can point out in the future if you have moved from friendly banter into confronting or overly aggressive (which many of us find very unpleasant) talk, but I will not go through back messages. They were unpleasant the first time, I won’t go back there again. Sorry.
Do I need to bite someone?
 
fully understand that. My point is I did not start the aggressive posturing. Only returned it. I will concede that is no justification for it. There should be a block function on this platform, mebe……

Hi Kindfarmer,

I follow the Politics Board way more than is good for me and I’ve seen many conversations you’re part of. When you drop in on the Play Ground please take a breath, let the adrenaline run down a bit and get in fun mode before jumping in.

This place is for lovers, not madness and slights. :)

(I like your screen name BTW.) :rose:
 
Hi Kindfarmer,

I follow the Politics Board way more than is good for me and I’ve seen many conversations you’re part of. When you drop in on the Play Ground please take a breath, let the adrenaline run down a bit and get in fun mode before jumping in.

This place is for lovers, not madness and slights. :)

(I like your screen name BTW.) :rose:
Thank you. That is why I venture there. (Here🙈) I suppose I will have to be fully adult and when someone attacks me and just ignore them…… that’s a heavy lift! 😉
 
Back
Top