Chaotic Coffee Klatch (tea also available)

[Mr_Soup]

Canadian.

Also, that's what I appreciates abouts you.

Is that what you appreciate about her?

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

What can I say, I'm sick...

You are? Last I remember, you were going on holiday 0.0
Cmere *hugsqueezies*

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

Is that what you appreciate about her?

Shush you, and you call me Instigator. Ha!

 

[HeavyBalls]

*sits on my couch, hacks, coughs up funny colours...

That hurts and I don't like it.

 

[Photog1rl]

Hey chaos. It’s been a day-mostly fun filled! I’m wondering if it’s safe to jump back in…
Who is kindfarmer and why are they stirring up shit? I don’t care enough to go back and read through it it all-I was kind of hoping they would just go away but that doesn’t seem to be happening.
I am usually a love and let love (this was supposed to say live and let live but I mistyped twice so I kept it) but this seems annoying and like it’s creating bad chaos. Is there a consensus about the best way to move forward?
Edited to add

Like group ignore(feels kind of grade school)?

Hope they jut go away?

Hope they just get it?

 

[Mr_Soup]

Shush you, and you call me Instigator. Ha!

That was more of a jab at him than you. Letterkenny fans understand.

 

[HeavyBalls]

Hey chaos. It’s been a day-mostly fun filled! I’m wondering if it’s safe to jump back in…
Who is kindfarmer and why are they stirring up shit? I don’t care enough to go back and read through it it all-I was kind of hoping they would just go away but that doesn’t seem to be happening.
I am usually a love and let love (this was supposed to say live and let live but I mistyped twice so I kept it) but this seems annoying and like it’s creating bad chaos. Is there a consensus about the best way to move forward?

Shit disturbers?

Sounds like Degens from up country...

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

Hey chaos. It’s been a day-mostly fun filled! I’m wondering if it’s safe to jump back in…
Who is kindfarmer and why are they stirring up shit? I don’t care enough to go back and read through it it all-I was kind of hoping they would just go away but that doesn’t seem to be happening.
I am usually a love and let love (this was supposed to say live and let live but I mistyped twice so I kept it) but this seems annoying and like it’s creating bad chaos. Is there a consensus about the best way to move forward?

I haven't bothered to catch up on what he's been up to before, but I'm ignoring him based on what I have seen so far. His is not the vibe I come here for, and life's just too short for that

 

[lakesailer_mi]

When I came back I saw this thread and started posting in it a little and watching it. Mostly because a few old friends and aquaintances posted here quite a bit (who I won't specifically name in case they want plausible deniability! ).

I have to admit that I chuckled a little at the name "Chaos" both because I got the tongue in cheek reference to what happens in most Lit threads of this nature, but also because I thought "yeah, chaos...lmao...they don't *really* know what that means." Keeping in mind that - back when I was young and could actually do mathematics, - I did some work in Chaos theory (not much, I was never *that* good).

But as I've watched, I've reached a new level of appreciation for the aptness of this thread name.

One formal definition of "Chaos" is called Weak Sensitive Dependence and it says: A system characterized by J(x(t)) has the property of weak sensitive dependence on its initial conditions if and only if ∃ε>0 ∀x(0) ∀δ>0 ∃t>0 ∃y(0) so that if |x(0)−y(0)|<δ and |J(x(t))−J(y(t))|>ε.

(I put that in just to be obnoxious, to prove that I can read math fluently, and because...well...it contributes to the chaos! How many other Lit threads have ∀ and ∃ in them!).
In simple terms it says that no matter how close two starting values (x(0) and y(0)) may be, after a sufficient time (t), the system J will lead to J(x(t)) and J(y(t) being "far away". I think clearly we can apply this definition here given how quickly the posts evolve into total weirdness!

I'm thinking, you know...maybe there's a paper here... But getting this past IRB is going to be a bitch....

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

That was more of a jab at him than you. Letterkenny fans understand.

Darn it, I don't wanna google Letterkenny again I could swear beastie or chemgirl already tried to tell me what it is

 

[jason28053]

Blurt:
I do not understand thong sandles. Who can actually stand that thing between their toes???
It's a kind of torture

What about thong panties? I love the look but are they comfortable?

 

[Mr_Soup]

Hey chaos. It’s been a day-mostly fun filled! I’m wondering if it’s safe to jump back in…
Who is kindfarmer and why are they stirring up shit? I don’t care enough to go back and read through it it all-I was kind of hoping they would just go away but that doesn’t seem to be happening.
I am usually a love and let love (this was supposed to say live and let live but I mistyped twice so I kept it) but this seems annoying and like it’s creating bad chaos. Is there a consensus about the best way to move forward?
Edited to add

Like group ignore(feels kind of grade school)?

Hope they jut go away?

Hope they just get it?

My policy always is, tell them once, ignore the old fashioned way afterwards. Like everyone else, I come here for fun, not bullshit.

So how do we all feel about boobs? Boobs are good, yes?

 

[Codeman93]

Hi pervs

 

[HeavyBalls]

My policy always is, tell them once, ignore the old fashioned way afterwards. Like everyone else, I come here for fun, not bullshit.

So how do we all feel about boobs? Boobs are good, yes?

Hi, I'm the Beast.

And I LOVE boobs.

 

[Mr_Soup]

Shit disturbers?

Sounds like Degens from up country...

Anyone who messes with the owl is messing with me and I suggest they let that marinate.

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

So, I have missed Zombies (pass me my 12ga pump) and Ostrich Fucking (allegedly) and more farm-related posts?

What else. No boobs I hope. (I was yelling very loud working very hard all afternoon).

 

[HeavyBalls]

Anyone who messes with the owl is messing with me and I suggest they let that marinate.

I'll have a scrap...

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

When I came back I saw this thread and started posting in it a little and watching it. Mostly because a few old friends and aquaintances posted here quite a bit (who I won't specifically name in case they want plausible deniability! ).

I have to admit that I chuckled a little at the name "Chaos" both because I got the tongue in cheek reference to what happens in most Lit threads of this nature, but also because I thought "yeah, chaos...lmao...they don't *really* know what that means." Keeping in mind that - back when I was young and could actually do mathematics, - I did some work in Chaos theory (not much, I was never *that* good).

But as I've watched, I've reached a new level of appreciation for the aptness of this thread name.

One formal definition of "Chaos" is called Weak Sensitive Dependence and it says: A system characterized by J(x(t)) has the property of weak sensitive dependence on its initial conditions if and only if ∃ε>0 ∀x(0) ∀δ>0 ∃t>0 ∃y(0) so that if |x(0)−y(0)|<δ and |J(x(t))−J(y(t))|>ε.

(I put that in just to be obnoxious, to prove that I can read math fluently, and because...well...it contributes to the chaos! How many other Lit threads have ∀ and ∃ in them!).
In simple terms it says that no matter how close two starting values (x(0) and y(0)) may be, after a sufficient time (t), the system J will lead to J(x(t)) and J(y(t) being "far away". I think clearly we can apply this definition here given how quickly the posts evolve into total weirdness!

I'm thinking, you know...maybe there's a paper here... But getting this past IRB is going to be a bitch....

I haven't drank enough for this

 

[Mr_Soup]

When I came back I saw this thread and started posting in it a little and watching it. Mostly because a few old friends and aquaintances posted here quite a bit (who I won't specifically name in case they want plausible deniability! ).

I have to admit that I chuckled a little at the name "Chaos" both because I got the tongue in cheek reference to what happens in most Lit threads of this nature, but also because I thought "yeah, chaos...lmao...they don't *really* know what that means." Keeping in mind that - back when I was young and could actually do mathematics, - I did some work in Chaos theory (not much, I was never *that* good).

But as I've watched, I've reached a new level of appreciation for the aptness of this thread name.

One formal definition of "Chaos" is called Weak Sensitive Dependence and it says: A system characterized by J(x(t)) has the property of weak sensitive dependence on its initial conditions if and only if ∃ε>0 ∀x(0) ∀δ>0 ∃t>0 ∃y(0) so that if |x(0)−y(0)|<δ and |J(x(t))−J(y(t))|>ε.

(I put that in just to be obnoxious, to prove that I can read math fluently, and because...well...it contributes to the chaos! How many other Lit threads have ∀ and ∃ in them!).
In simple terms it says that no matter how close two starting values (x(0) and y(0)) may be, after a sufficient time (t), the system J will lead to J(x(t)) and J(y(t) being "far away". I think clearly we can apply this definition here given how quickly the posts evolve into total weirdness!

I'm thinking, you know...maybe there's a paper here... But getting this past IRB is going to be a bitch....

This might be too chaotic for Chaos even. Like some weird paradoxical shit. Or maybe it’s my lack of sleep.

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

When I came back I saw this thread and started posting in it a little and watching it. Mostly because a few old friends and aquaintances posted here quite a bit (who I won't specifically name in case they want plausible deniability! ).

I have to admit that I chuckled a little at the name "Chaos" both because I got the tongue in cheek reference to what happens in most Lit threads of this nature, but also because I thought "yeah, chaos...lmao...they don't *really* know what that means." Keeping in mind that - back when I was young and could actually do mathematics, - I did some work in Chaos theory (not much, I was never *that* good).

But as I've watched, I've reached a new level of appreciation for the aptness of this thread name.

One formal definition of "Chaos" is called Weak Sensitive Dependence and it says: A system characterized by J(x(t)) has the property of weak sensitive dependence on its initial conditions if and only if ∃ε>0 ∀x(0) ∀δ>0 ∃t>0 ∃y(0) so that if |x(0)−y(0)|<δ and |J(x(t))−J(y(t))|>ε.

(I put that in just to be obnoxious, to prove that I can read math fluently, and because...well...it contributes to the chaos! How many other Lit threads have ∀ and ∃ in them!).
In simple terms it says that no matter how close two starting values (x(0) and y(0)) may be, after a sufficient time (t), the system J will lead to J(x(t)) and J(y(t) being "far away". I think clearly we can apply this definition here given how quickly the posts evolve into total weirdness!

I'm thinking, you know...maybe there's a paper here... But getting this past IRB is going to be a bitch....

But surely, it is also an expression of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, because Chaos is just Entropy with a good Press Agent... dS>=0

 

[Mr_Soup]

Darn it, I don't wanna google Letterkenny again I could swear beastie or chemgirl already tried to tell me what it is

You just need to binge watch it. That is all.

 

[lakesailer_mi]

I haven't drank enough for this

This is exactly why I drink...
Join me!
View attachment 2193571

 

[AngelWithAShotgun]

But surely, it is also an expression of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, because Chaos is just Entropy with a good Press Agent... dS>=0

Don't you be encouraging him

 

[Photog1rl]

Shit disturbers?

Sounds like Degens from up country...

Googled “degens from up country”. No idea what(who) Letterkenny is but saw this gif and thought it might apply…View attachment 2193570

 

[HeavyBalls]

Darn it, I don't wanna google Letterkenny again I could swear beastie or chemgirl already tried to tell me what it is

Back to chornin'...