Werewolves vs Bestiality

[TheFapinator]

Werewolves are undoubtedly a popular trope in erotica, and rightfully so, those with an open-mind can see the appeal; men and women alike. I haven't read too many werewolf stories, but in the ones I have read, the werewolf characters in each are very much alike. Bipedal, canine-shaped head, maybe a tail and etc. However I've noticed quadrupedal types are pretty rare, maybe even almost non-existent. Could it be that a four-legged werewolf too closely resembles a regular wolf or dog? Especially when having sex with a female human, it would mount her and hump like a dog would, which makes one think of one of the most unholiest taboos, the B-word.

The only saving grace for that argument is, "Well, it's a werewolf, not a dog or a complete animal." But with Lit's guidelines being firm, could writing a story about a quadrupedal werewolf be rejected on grounds of bestiality? I'm actually thinking about a story with one such werewolf, but when this thought came across my mind, I almost tossed it. To clarify, I'm not looking to try and, 'sneak one past' the Lit moderators by disguising. I'm not envisioning the werewolves from the Twilight series, but the ones from the TV series, Being Human (US version) but I'd hate to write it only for it to get shot down. What do you think?

 

[Demiurging]

Could it be rejected? Absolutely it could, but that's not the final word on the subject; it might shrug itself right under the line.

I would say that you have a better chance of acceptance if you ensure that the werewolf's agency, intelligence, and suchlike are preserved from their human selves. Sure, you lose out on some of that nice feral nature, but unless humanity is behind the fangs, what you've essentially done is remove a human and put an animal in his place.

But of course, it's all up to Laurel's view on the subject.

 

[TheFapinator]

Could it be rejected? Absolutely it could, but that's not the final word on the subject; it might shrug itself right under the line.

I would say that you have a better chance of acceptance if you ensure that the werewolf's agency, intelligence, and suchlike are preserved from their human selves. Sure, you lose out on some of that nice feral nature, but unless humanity is behind the fangs, what you've essentially done is remove a human and put an animal in his place.

But of course, it's all up to Laurel's view on the subject.

Too many 'ifs" it seems. I often wonder why I can't have normal perverted ideas?