MelissaBaby
Wordy Bitch
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2017
- Posts
- 7,694
Have you ever heard the term "exocentric verb-noun compound agent noun"?
I had not, until I read this fascinating twitter thread.
For those who are twitter allergic, an agent noun is a word that describes someone who does something. Someone who fights is a fighter. That's an agent noun.
Compound agent nouns add a noun to make it more specific. Someone who fights fires is a firefighter.
That's the way it was done in Old English, and that's the way it's done in Modern English.
But, for a short period, from about 1550-1700, there was another construct, the exocentric verb-noun compound agent noun, in which the verb preceded the agent noun. It didn't exist before that period, it virtually died out afterwards.
Examples: Pickpocket, spendthrift, swashbuckler, turncoat, cutthroat, scofflaw.
There might have been many more which have been lost.
And what is really interesting is that nearly all of them are insults or describe someone unsavory.
Personally, I think we ought to bring the construct back. Any ideas?
I had not, until I read this fascinating twitter thread.
For those who are twitter allergic, an agent noun is a word that describes someone who does something. Someone who fights is a fighter. That's an agent noun.
Compound agent nouns add a noun to make it more specific. Someone who fights fires is a firefighter.
That's the way it was done in Old English, and that's the way it's done in Modern English.
But, for a short period, from about 1550-1700, there was another construct, the exocentric verb-noun compound agent noun, in which the verb preceded the agent noun. It didn't exist before that period, it virtually died out afterwards.
Examples: Pickpocket, spendthrift, swashbuckler, turncoat, cutthroat, scofflaw.
There might have been many more which have been lost.
And what is really interesting is that nearly all of them are insults or describe someone unsavory.
Personally, I think we ought to bring the construct back. Any ideas?
Last edited: