Chaotic Coffee Klatch (tea also available)

I could get into that game

I couldn't get into it! V just seemed better all around
Honestly, I liked CIv IV the best, I think. Maybe III.
I've never played V. Been tempted to pick it up, but even I only have so much time. 😛

I have III, IV, and VI. III sucked up much of my 30's, and I regret nothing! I'm not the biggest IV fan. It has its moments, but I'm not a fan of the setup or the gameplay.
 
All this game talk makes me wat to go find a poker game.
That would be fun too! :D
The way people get obsessed with 'games' is really disturbing. And not in a joking way.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-qd1iOhAzWiY%2FXxXhHEsv2-I%2FAAAAAAAAcBU%2FOCsHYjL81dsHVIi4_zLpzHjeLs4YBQA8gCLcBGAsYHQ%2Fs400%2Ftg33.png&f=1&nofb=1


I don't understand how people fall in so deep.

I see it as debilitating and harmful.
I say the same thing about drugs.
 
I've never played V. Been tempted to pick it up, but even I only have so much time. 😛

I have III, IV, and VI. III sucked up much of my 30's, and I regret nothing! I'm not the biggest IV fan. It has its moments, but I'm not a fan of the setup or the gameplay.
I started with I. II was a big upgrade from I, and then III was like a giant leap. I probably spent more time on that than anything else. But IV...I can't remember now, been a while, IV had some good things too, but it wasn't a giant leap. That's how I've felt about everything since. Has some good points, but are they worth incrementally losing the smooth flow of the earlier versions?
 
There's online poker places, and I'm not sure if any just host private games, but I've always thought strip poker would be a decent game to play with a group of litsters
Oh, they exist. I don't much care for online poker. I'd rather be in a room where I can watch the player as well as my cards.

And a Strip Poker gathering sounds interesting.
 
I started with I. II was a big upgrade from I, and then III was like a giant leap. I probably spent more time on that than anything else. But IV...I can't remember now, been a while, IV had some good things too, but it wasn't a giant leap. That's how I've felt about everything since. Has some good points, but are they worth incrementally losing the smooth flow of the earlier versions?
You have to consider how quickly PCs evolved in that early era. Civ III was '97, '98? Civ II came out during Windows 3.1, I'm almost certain. Civ I goes back. . . further than that, like the actual original Oregon Trail game.
 
You have to consider how quickly PCs evolved in that early era. Civ III was '97, '98? Civ II came out during Windows 3.1, I'm almost certain. Civ I goes back. . . further than that, like the actual original Oregon Trail game.
Yup, Civ I came out in '91, so...wow, can't even remember what that ran off, but that was back when Windows was optional. :ROFLMAO:

But totally true, the development was helped by the concurrent PC development, processors, graphics, etc. And at some point, there's diminishing returns to everything.
 
The way people get obsessed with 'games' is really disturbing. And not in a joking way.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-qd1iOhAzWiY%2FXxXhHEsv2-I%2FAAAAAAAAcBU%2FOCsHYjL81dsHVIi4_zLpzHjeLs4YBQA8gCLcBGAsYHQ%2Fs400%2Ftg33.png&f=1&nofb=1


I don't understand how people fall in so deep.

I see it as debilitating and harmful.
People sit in front of the tv all day. I get lost reading for hours at a time. It’s people doing things they enjoy with their free time. There’s been studies showing surgeons who play video games perform better because it helps with hand/eye coordination.
 
Back
Top