LTMMC
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
- Posts
- 251
re: debate between Katie and WB in posts 151, 153, 154
I find your brief debate above, is a rather fitting illustration of the transactional nature of sex in many long-term marriages. In marriages between two typical partners, with only one of them truly enjoying the sexual part of it.
And to me it illustrates also my following thesis: once sex has become transactional between two spouses, a far better transaction partner for the willing spouse who truly desires sex, better be a sex professional. Rather than a wife, who needs loads of bribes and coaxing for finding sex with her husband enjoyable. In many such cases the fee the professional charges, is minimal, compared to all the fuss required for getting a wife in the mood.
The same applies to husbands also, who never learned to enjoy sex right. Who never learned the arousal part of it, and the mutuality it offers, and the very much bonding kind of bliss that making love can gift to two partners who are open to it.
We are really talking about an OPEN attitude toward what sex can offer, to BOTH partners, providing the woman learns how to enjoy it. Katie seems to forget that. And so seemingly does the wife of WB, and the ex-wife of votadini. Learning to enjoy what erotic intimacy has to offer is not rocket science, but one must throw prudery overboard, first of all, and embrace one’s own sexuality wholeheartedly.
And if there isn’t much sexuality to start with, in one partner, developing it can be learned as well. If she is open to it. A woman who never learned to masturbate, for instance, and enjoyably so, belongs in a school where that is being taught. And not on the couch of a shrink. Or of a typical run-of-the-mill type marriage counselor.
And it is by no means the husband who is responsible for his wife’s orgasms, but the wife herself. Trouble is: most mothers don’t teach their daughters how to cumm; instead they teach them how to manipulate their husbands for their own benefit. And when a woman allows herself to be indoctrinated by her mother, on how many precious tributes of one kind or another she better extract from her husband, before she opens her legs for him, SHE is the one to blame, and not he.
The transactional nature of sex has been a highly successful business model for millenia of human existence (with the exception of those fortunate couples who BOTH enjoyed their sexuality always). And the business model only began to falter during the 20th century, when more and more women started believing they no longer needed to live up to their side of the bargain. … I know my position sounds a bit harsh, but I always find realism more helpful than wishful thinking.
I find your brief debate above, is a rather fitting illustration of the transactional nature of sex in many long-term marriages. In marriages between two typical partners, with only one of them truly enjoying the sexual part of it.
And to me it illustrates also my following thesis: once sex has become transactional between two spouses, a far better transaction partner for the willing spouse who truly desires sex, better be a sex professional. Rather than a wife, who needs loads of bribes and coaxing for finding sex with her husband enjoyable. In many such cases the fee the professional charges, is minimal, compared to all the fuss required for getting a wife in the mood.
The same applies to husbands also, who never learned to enjoy sex right. Who never learned the arousal part of it, and the mutuality it offers, and the very much bonding kind of bliss that making love can gift to two partners who are open to it.
We are really talking about an OPEN attitude toward what sex can offer, to BOTH partners, providing the woman learns how to enjoy it. Katie seems to forget that. And so seemingly does the wife of WB, and the ex-wife of votadini. Learning to enjoy what erotic intimacy has to offer is not rocket science, but one must throw prudery overboard, first of all, and embrace one’s own sexuality wholeheartedly.
And if there isn’t much sexuality to start with, in one partner, developing it can be learned as well. If she is open to it. A woman who never learned to masturbate, for instance, and enjoyably so, belongs in a school where that is being taught. And not on the couch of a shrink. Or of a typical run-of-the-mill type marriage counselor.
And it is by no means the husband who is responsible for his wife’s orgasms, but the wife herself. Trouble is: most mothers don’t teach their daughters how to cumm; instead they teach them how to manipulate their husbands for their own benefit. And when a woman allows herself to be indoctrinated by her mother, on how many precious tributes of one kind or another she better extract from her husband, before she opens her legs for him, SHE is the one to blame, and not he.
The transactional nature of sex has been a highly successful business model for millenia of human existence (with the exception of those fortunate couples who BOTH enjoyed their sexuality always). And the business model only began to falter during the 20th century, when more and more women started believing they no longer needed to live up to their side of the bargain. … I know my position sounds a bit harsh, but I always find realism more helpful than wishful thinking.