Just another day in the gun paradise of the world.

[BabyBoomer50s]

Hey, I'll be honest, I am not reading it, I am just laughing at you assholes in the US defending people having access to military grade weapons that they then use to kill innocent people. His party affiliation means nothing to me, there are no US parties in Canada.

But I get a hoot out of you dumbfuck Americans defending your rights to have those guns and to use them to kill innocent people.

No one here cares what you think. We do like our little brothers and sisters in Canada though.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

No one here cares what you think. We do like our little brothers and sisters in Canada though.

Aww..no one cares, well if you didn't care, you wouldn't respond now would you.....

*chuckles* I swear you get dumber and more meaningless by the second....thanks though for not denying you are fighting for the right to keep arming up lunatics with military grade weapons to kill innocent people....

Can I ask why you're so dead set against abortions....oh wait I get it. If you don't get those babies born, you're worried you might run out of innocents to shoot.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

So he wrapped himself in Trump trappings. To the left he’s a MAGA fan, to the right he’s a false flagger, and to Trump and the NRA he’s a good customer.

According to the Right, if you were seen flying the flag/wearing the colors and at the marches/events, you're a part of the team.

all the "seems like" pitter-patter against those optic bonafides won't matter unless the top dog Cheeto himself comes out and says he wasn't one of us.

https://y.yarn.co/fc90d99f-655c-4874-8ec6-ff87943004eb_text.gif

 

[AlexBailey]

It's funny watching you avoiding the point.

You're missing the point that we don't have the same point.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Aww..no one cares, well if you didn't care, you wouldn't respond now would you.....

*chuckles* I swear you get dumber and more meaningless by the second....thanks though for not denying you are fighting for the right to keep arming up lunatics with military grade weapons to kill innocent people....

Can I ask why you're so dead set against abortions....oh wait I get it. If you don't get those babies born, you're worried you might run out of innocents to shoot.

I’m dead set against 9 judicial appointees fabricating constitutional rights that don’t exist in the Constitution. I favor representative government. Glad it’s been corrected. I do get a kick out of unhinged posts by angry Canadians though. Stay on your side of the border and you won’t get hurt.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I’m dead set against 9 judicial appointees fabricating constitutional rights that don’t exist in the Constitution. I favor representative government. Glad it’s been corrected. I do get a kick out of unhinged posts by angry Canadians though.

unhinged......*chuckles*........look in the mirror...

Stay on your side of the border and you won’t get hurt.

threats now? *chuckles* and the boomer ship is sinking fast......lol

 

[jaF0]

Aww..no one cares, well if you didn't care, you wouldn't respond now would you.....

You're missing the point that we don't have the same point.

And yet, you continue to respond to it.

 

[rockcasbah]

I’m dead set against 9 judicial appointees fabricating constitutional rights that don’t exist in the Constitution. I favor representative government. Glad it’s been corrected. I do get a kick out of unhinged posts by angry Canadians though. Stay on your side of the border and you won’t get hurt.

Don’t hurt me, Baby!

I’m too pretty to die!

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

unhinged......*chuckles*........look in the mirror...


threats now? *chuckles* and the boomer ship is sinking fast......lol

No, definitely not a threat. I like my little brothers and sisters to the north. You sounded frightened about guns in the US so I was just suggesting staying away from here as a precaution.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Don’t hurt me, Baby!

I’m too pretty to die!

You’re safe. I wish nothing but the best for my little brothers and sisters to the north.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

No, definitely not a threat. I like my little brothers and sisters to the north. You sounded frightened about guns in the US so I was just suggesting staying away from here as a precaution.

You have a major reading comprehension issue, but that's not overly surprising. Show me one post where I have ever advocated for a ban on firearms? Just one...pretty please with sugar on it.

Yah not a threat......*chuckles* you got pissed...made a veiled threat....like I said, time to dump the boomer Alt.

 

[dmonty]

Hey, I'll be honest, I am not reading it, I am just laughing at you assholes in the US defending people having access to military grade weapons that they then use to kill innocent people. His party affiliation means nothing to me, there are no US parties in Canada.

But I get a hoot out of you dumbfuck Americans defending your rights to have those guns and to use them to kill innocent people.

US Citizens have always had access to military grade weapons, in fact since our founding over 80% of our Navy and all our artillery were privately owned and operated. During the Spanish American War, US citizens could buy potato diggers (Colt–Browning M189 machine gun) and armed Teddy Roosevelts Rough Riders (2 women window shopping bought them, no license, registration, waiting periods or background checks)... Many Americans still own working canons and other artillery pieces.

It wasn't until the unconstitutional laws that the feds started "banning" military grade weapons in the 1930's and 1960's by citizens, the US Citizen can still own and operate them without any restrictions, but have to live with the corrupt oath violators in law enforcement enforcing these unconstitutional laws.

But to date, not any military grade weapon has been used in any mass shooting since 1934 St Valentine's Day Massacre (When two Chicago gangs had a turf war, only criminals were killed and harmed). Since then only two incidents have been recorded since 1934: one was a doctor or dentist (exact details are sketchy) who used his legally owned sub-machine gun in a murder. The other is much more well known, on September 15th, 1988, Patrolman Roger Waller of the Dayton, OH police department, used his fully automatic MAC-11 .380 caliber sub-machine gun to kill a police informant. Waller plead guilty in 1990, and he and an accomplice were sentenced to 18 years in prison. There hasn't been a military grade weapon used in any murder since.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

US Citizens have always had access to military grade weapons, in fact since our founding over 80% of our Navy and all our artillery were privately owned and operated. During the Spanish American War, US citizens could buy potato diggers (Colt–Browning M189 machine gun) and armed Teddy Roosevelts Rough Riders (2 women window shopping bought them, no license, registration, waiting periods or background checks)... Many Americans still own working canons and other artillery pieces.

It wasn't until the unconstitutional laws that the feds started "banning" military grade weapons in the 1930's and 1960's by citizens, the US Citizen can still own and operate them without any restrictions, but have to live with the corrupt oath violators in law enforcement enforcing these unconstitutional laws.

But to date, not any military grade weapon has been used in any mass shooting since 1934 St Valentine's Day Massacre (When two Chicago gangs had a turf war, only criminals were killed and harmed). Since then only two incidents have been recorded since 1934: one was a doctor or dentist (exact details are sketchy) who used his legally owned sub-machine gun in a murder. The other is much more well known, on September 15th, 1988, Patrolman Roger Waller of the Dayton, OH police department, used his fully automatic MAC-11 .380 caliber sub-machine gun to kill a police informant. Waller plead guilty in 1990, and he and an accomplice were sentenced to 18 years in prison. There hasn't been a military grade weapon used in any murder since.

So what? You obviously support nut jobs getting military grade weapons and watch them use them to kill innocent people as well........why am I not surprised.

Can you buy an M1 rifle in the US, I can here, now I could be wrong, but that is a military grade rifle. Sort of like the good ole AR-15 you keep harping about. Please try and get your facts in order when presenting an argument. ( like tommyguns were hard to get in those days...)

 

[dmonty]

So what? You obviously support nut jobs getting military grade weapons and watch them use them to kill innocent people as well........why am I not surprised.

Can you buy an M1 rifle in the US, I can here, now I could be wrong, but that is a military grade rifle. Sort of like the good ole AR-15 you keep harping about. Please try and get your facts in order when presenting an argument. ( like tommyguns were hard to get in those days...)

An AR-15 is not a military grade weapon. And yes americans can buy the M1, a military weapon, and they do, but none are using it for criminal usage. So no I don't support nut jobs buying any weapons, but like all civil liberties in the US, its a right that cannot be denied without due process, so until they actually cause harm they cannot be denied. Its funny how only firearms are only civil liberty that one must prove their "non malicious" intentions when they are innocent, and can be denied their rights - these unconstitutional and illegal civilian disarmament laws only disarm the innocent.

Tommy guns and other machine guns were not hard to get, not sure where you got those facts - they may have been relatively expensive, but not hard to get. 2 women purchased the Browning Potato Diggers for Teddy Roosevelts Rough Riders during the Spanish American War (no background check, middle of 5th Ave Manhattan, no registration, no waiting periods, and no license, and a straw purchase to boot), and many Americans were buying them via magazines through the 1960's no background checks, or license or registration, most states didn;t even now their citizens were buying em.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

An AR-15 is not a military grade weapon.

The AR-15 platform is military in design. What kind of fucking idiot are you? It's based directly upon the Colt AR-15. If your gona have a debate, at least be honest with yourself, it's hard to bullshit when the facts are against you.

 

[coati]

According to the Right, if you were seen flying the flag/wearing the colors and at the marches/events, you're a part of the team.

all the "seems like" pitter-patter against those optic bonafides won't matter unless the top dog Cheeto himself comes out and says he wasn't one of us.

The bottom line for me about this mass murderer is that I blame the lack of a strong father figure in white households.

 

[dmonty]

The AR-15 platform is military in design. What kind of fucking idiot are you? It's based directly upon the Colt AR-15. If your gona have a debate, at least be honest with yourself, it's hard to bullshit when the facts are against you.

Wow, you know absolutely nothing about the AR-15, yes Colt purchased the AR-15 from Armalite (Also the AR stands for Armalite, and was a subsidiary of Fairchild Aircraft Company), but that seems to be all you know about this rifle.

The AR-15 designed by Eugene Stoner in the late 1940's and was designed for the civilian market, Armalite Rifle began manufacturing them in the 1950's, his work on the AR-7 and AR-10 (a concept to replace the M1) were military weapons, but did not have success in selling to the US military which eventually ended up causing financial difficulties and the need to sell.

When Colt bought the AR-15 from Armalite, they also got Eugene Stoner and they began to design military weapons, starting with the M16 in the 1960's, and was successful in getting the military contracts. However the M16 was a modified version of the civilian AR-15.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/167...-an-ar-15-an-m16-theyre-frighteningly-similar

Nowadays, the AR-15 is the most popular rifle in America. With an estimated 10,000,000+ in civilian hands, it has earned the well-deserved moniker, “America’s Rifle”. With so many variations available now from the Pistol to SBR, or a service rifle to SPR or hunting variety, the AR-15 has developed into a platform suitable for the every man, and all of their needs. The M16 has four variations in service with the United States Military the most recent adaptation, the M16A4, was finalized in 1997, giving our soldiers the ability to mount optics and accessories to the top rail and handguard, giving them a rifle more adaptable to their environment and fight. Something the AR-15 had long before 1997, once again the civilian market provided a feature that was eventually adopted by the military almost 15 years later.

The AR-15 is typically used for target practice, shooting competitions and varmint hunting.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Terminology means fuck all. The guns used in the massacres of American children are weapons of mass destruction. Every one of them.
And when people say gun laws don't work, they need to look at California. One of the strictest states for gun laws and also one of the lowest murder by W.M.D. per capita states.

 

[coati]

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah about how smart I think I am about AR-15s...

The AR-15 is typically used for target practice, shooting competitions and varmint hunting.

We don't give a shit how smart you think you are. AR-15s and its knock-offs are used to commit mass murders, because they can kill a lot of people rapidly. Ban them for everyone who is not serving in law enforcement or in a "well-regulated militia".

BTW, if you need an AR-15 for hunting, then you suck at hunting and need to think about becoming a vegan.

 

[dmonty]

Terminology means fuck all. The guns used in the massacres of American children are weapons of mass destruction. Every one of them.
And when people say gun laws don't work, they need to look at California. One of the strictest states for gun laws and also one of the lowest murder by W.M.D. per capita states.

and yet the stats, have California as the state witht he most mass shootings.... So yeah those unconstitutional laws are only murdering more people, as they are disarming innocent citizens. Also note that the number of defensive gun uses far exceed criminal misuse (fewer then 400 murders by your pejorative "weapons of mass destruction" vs the over 1million every year of self defense usage). So with your plan to disarm Americans unconstitutionally, you seem to be the only one supporting massacres of children in America.

 

[dmonty]

We don't give a shit how smart you think you are. AR-15s and its knock-offs are used to commit mass murders, because they can kill a lot of people rapidly. Ban them for everyone who is not serving in law enforcement or in a "well-regulated militia".

BTW, if you need an AR-15 for hunting, then you suck at hunting and need to think about becoming a vegan.

The Modern Sporting Rifles, (the AR-15 is part of this category) cannot shoot any faster then any other semi-automatic firearm, they are all limited to how fast you can pull the trigger for each shot - this rate of fire is unchanged since the rifle was first manufactured in the early 1950's. As for your misunderstanding of the English language, the 2nd Amendments Prefatory clause is just a singular reason, not the only reason, and second "well-Regulated" means to be in proper working order, well functioning it does not and has never meant to be government regulated/controlled.

As for your theory on they are used to commit "mass murders", they account for less then 4% of all murders in the US by firearms, people's hands/feet kill more people every year (maybe we should amputate everyone's hands and feet since they kill more people then rifles), also should probably ban knives and bats since they also kill more people every year then AR-15 and "knock-off's".

You may also want to do a Google Search on militia and who the militia is (hint its all Americans, not those in military service).

 

[coati]

The Modern Sporting Rifles, (the AR-15 is part of this category) cannot shoot any faster then any other semi-automatic firearm, they are all limited to how fast you can pull the trigger for each shot - this rate of fire is unchanged since the rifle was first manufactured in the early 1950's. As for your misunderstanding of the English language, the 2nd Amendments Prefatory clause is just a singular reason, not the only reason, and second "well-Regulated" means to be in proper working order, well functioning it does not and has never meant to be government regulated/controlled.

As for your theory on they are used to commit "mass murders", they account for less then 4% of all murders in the US by firearms, people's hands/feet kill more people every year (maybe we should amputate everyone's hands and feet since they kill more people then rifles), also should probably ban knives and bats since they also kill more people every year then AR-15 and "knock-off's".

You may also want to do a Google Search on militia and who the militia is (hint its all Americans, not those in military service).

^^^ Yet another know-it-all asshole who memorized his NRA talking points and vomits them on the porn board because he gets a hard-on fantasizing that he's part of a well-regulated militia which includes all Americans.

Therefore, Crimo was just part of the well-regulated militia. The "fog of war" strikes again...

 

[phrodeau]

The Modern Sporting Rifles, (the AR-15 is part of this category) cannot shoot any faster then any other semi-automatic firearm, they are all limited to how fast you can pull the trigger for each shot - this rate of fire is unchanged since the rifle was first manufactured in the early 1950's. As for your misunderstanding of the English language, the 2nd Amendments Prefatory clause is just a singular reason, not the only reason, and second "well-Regulated" means to be in proper working order, well functioning it does not and has never meant to be government regulated/controlled.

As for your theory on they are used to commit "mass murders", they account for less then 4% of all murders in the US by firearms, people's hands/feet kill more people every year (maybe we should amputate everyone's hands and feet since they kill more people then rifles), also should probably ban knives and bats since they also kill more people every year then AR-15 and "knock-off's".

You may also want to do a Google Search on militia and who the militia is (hint its all Americans, not those in military service).

I am OK with anyone who’d try to slaughter a crowd with their hands and feet.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

The Modern Sporting Rifles, (the AR-15 is part of this category) cannot shoot any faster then any other semi-automatic firearm, they are all limited to how fast you can pull the trigger for each shot - this rate of fire is unchanged since the rifle was first manufactured in the early 1950's. As for your misunderstanding of the English language, the 2nd Amendments Prefatory clause is just a singular reason, not the only reason, and second "well-Regulated" means to be in proper working order, well functioning it does not and has never meant to be government regulated/controlled.

As for your theory on they are used to commit "mass murders", they account for less then 4% of all murders in the US by firearms, people's hands/feet kill more people every year (maybe we should amputate everyone's hands and feet since they kill more people then rifles), also should probably ban knives and bats since they also kill more people every year then AR-15 and "knock-off's".

You may also want to do a Google Search on militia and who the militia is (hint its all Americans, not those in military service).

Please explain in detail *my* plan to unconstutionally disarm Americans, you histrionic moron. And nice deflection about California gun laws. Disingenuous gun nuts like yourself are the reason why we'll never come to a reasonable agreement.

 

[RobDownSouth]

^^^ Yet another know-it-all asshole who memorized his NRA talking points and vomits them on the porn board because he gets a hard-on fantasizing that he's part of a well-regulated militia which includes all Americans.

Therefore, Crimo was just part of the well-regulated militia. The "fog of war" strikes again...

little dementy tries man-splaining "semi-automatic rate of fire" as a good thing, as if mass murderers being as limited to "only" 40 to 60 or so victims per minute, opposed to a full-automatic spray of 600 potential victims per minute. He seems to be implying that that is a "good" thing.