Allies of Karine Jean-Pierre say Biden admin set her up for failure by having a white man standing by for help

Counselor706

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Posts
2,665
Allies of the White House press secretary are blaming the Biden administration for her failures because they have a white man, John Kirby, standing by, according to a report in Politico.

The report outlined the struggles of Jean-Pierre, who assumed the duties of the office from Jen Psaki in May and become the first openly LGBTQ and black person to work as White House press secretary.

Jeanne-Pierre has had several embarrassing moments at the podium where she appears unprepared and incompetent.

Rather than blame these moments on Jeanne-Pierre, her allies blame the Biden administration and John Kirby, according to the Politico report.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/jean-pierre-biden-white-man
 
The previous administration made the job much easier by never having press conferences.
 
Funny how no one else seems to be noticing these "embarrassing moments". But I've got to give the righties credit for playing the left like a violin on their hypersensitivity on race as usual.
 
Well, duh. Can't have racism without a white dude in the building somewhere.
 
Well, duh. Can't have racism without a white dude in the building somewhere.
While I am well-acquainted with that point of view (which I myself do NOT share), I don't recall ever seeing it expressed here.
 
While I am well-acquainted with that point of view (which I myself do NOT share), I don't recall ever seeing it expressed here.
EVERY cry of "racism" inherently requires a white guy. Without a white guy, you don't get there.
 
EVERY cry of "racism" inherently requires a white guy. Without a white guy, you don't get there.
The definition of racism doesn't actually include the offender's race
 
The definition of racism doesn't actually include the offender's race
Lol, tell it to the adherents and sycophants of the "systemic whiteness" theory of racism.

Oh wait, I forgot, you won't do that because DEFLECTION.


Again.
 
Lol, tell it to the adherents and sycophants of the "systemic whiteness" theory of racism.

Oh wait, I forgot, you won't do that because DEFLECTION.


Again.
Systemic racism against blacks predominantly includes whites.

Racism, by itself, can be an offense by a person of any race.

But please tell me more how you've been the victim
 
Systemic racism against blacks predominantly includes whites.

Racism, by itself, can be an offense by a person of any race.

But please tell me more how you've been the victim
Noooooooooooooooo... You don't say.............






You poor poor baby. Maybe next time you'll choose your political/social investments more wisely.
 
Noooooooooooooooo... You don't say.............






You poor poor baby. Maybe next time you'll choose your political/social investments more wisely.
Good journey off the rails here. Well done.
 
She failed long before they brought him over from the Pentagon. She wouldn't make a pimple on Kayleigh McEnany's ass. Karine thumbs through the tabs on her notebook, trying to emulate McEnany's efficiency but she never comes up with an answer. Her only qualification was her race, gender, and sexual preference, the only things standard guiding the Biden Administration's choice of appointees.
 
Funny how no one else seems to be noticing these "embarrassing moments". But I've got to give the righties credit for playing the left like a violin on their hypersensitivity on race as usual.
The hypersensitivity on race, gender, and sexual preference lies with the Biden administration as it is their only criteria for public service.
 
EVERY cry of "racism" inherently requires a white guy. Without a white guy, you don't get there.
I repeat, I am familiar with that argument (though I don't agree with it myself), but I don't recall anyone here on Lit ever saying that. And you have yet to prove me wrong.

The hypersensitivity on race, gender, and sexual preference lies with the Biden administration as it is their only criteria for public service.
Yes, I get that you're committed to that belief.
 
Why refer to anyone as an ally of a press secretary? Is there a club that they’re supposed to belong to?
 
I repeat, I am familiar with that argument (though I don't agree with it myself), but I don't recall anyone here on Lit ever saying that. And you have yet to prove me wrong.


Yes, I get that you're committed to that belief.
I tell you what, let's get into a time machine and go back to the very first instance of racism.


*bee boop beep!* (who knew that time travel would be so noisy?)


Ok, see that black guy over there? The one being browbeaten because of his skin color? See the dude doing it? Yeah, him, the white guy. Notice that if I fliip this switcheroo thingy here and change the white guys skin color to match the black guys skin color.... Voila! Instantly no more racism because they're the same race. Flip the switcheroo thingy again aaaaaaaaaaaand we're back to racism as soon as the white guy shows up again.






Now, tell us again how racism could exist without the white guy.
 
I tell you what, let's get into a time machine and go back to the very first instance of racism.


*bee boop beep!* (who knew that time travel would be so noisy?)


Ok, see that black guy over there? The one being browbeaten because of his skin color? See the dude doing it? Yeah, him, the white guy. Notice that if I fliip this switcheroo thingy here and change the white guys skin color to match the black guys skin color.... Voila! Instantly no more racism because they're the same race. Flip the switcheroo thingy again aaaaaaaaaaaand we're back to racism as soon as the white guy shows up again.






Now, tell us again how racism could exist without the white guy.
Rwanda 1994.
 
I tell you what, let's get into a time machine and go back to the very first instance of racism.


*bee boop beep!* (who knew that time travel would be so noisy?)


Ok, see that black guy over there? The one being browbeaten because of his skin color? See the dude doing it? Yeah, him, the white guy. Notice that if I fliip this switcheroo thingy here and change the white guys skin color to match the black guys skin color.... Voila! Instantly no more racism because they're the same race. Flip the switcheroo thingy again aaaaaaaaaaaand we're back to racism as soon as the white guy shows up again.






Now, tell us again how racism could exist without the white guy.
Interesting insight into how your brain works.

No wonder....
 
I tell you what, let's get into a time machine and go back to the very first instance of racism.


*bee boop beep!* (who knew that time travel would be so noisy?)


Ok, see that black guy over there? The one being browbeaten because of his skin color? See the dude doing it? Yeah, him, the white guy. Notice that if I fliip this switcheroo thingy here and change the white guys skin color to match the black guys skin color.... Voila! Instantly no more racism because they're the same race. Flip the switcheroo thingy again aaaaaaaaaaaand we're back to racism as soon as the white guy shows up again.






Now, tell us again how racism could exist without the white guy.
Are you drunk? Seriously, I don't even see what you're trying to get at here.
 
Interesting insight into how your brain works.

No wonder....
Yeah, amazing isn't it that I don't see skin color but you do. And you use that sight as a basis for your decisions.

Meanwhile, I continue to believe that without a difference in RACE being present, there can be no RACE-ism. Thus the spew about the definition of racism not having skin color in it is just more deflection and bullshit on your part.

Because there is no racism without a difference in race. Which in the human species is reflected in skin color. But then again, I'm a person who ponders reality when forming his own opinions, while you require that someone actually spell it out in specific words and letters before you parrot it back.

Unless what you're objecting to is someone who disagrees with you. THEN you're big on inferences and innuendoes.
 
Back
Top