Mourning the Dictatorship.

Chobham

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 26, 2022
Posts
6,567
The recent Supreme Court session has returned more power to the people, either directly or through their elected representatives, than any court in recent history. Yet judging by many comments regarding the courts actions you would think that the collapse of civilization is nigh.

It seems to me that there is a large segment of our population that wants to be told what they can do and when they can do it by a president and the unelected drones of the bureaucracy. Of course some of these edicts are in the form of 'permissions' as well and who doesn't like 'permissions'? In other words they seem to prefer a dictatorship of sorts, as long as it's 'their' dictator.

Being a citizen of a nation of self-governing people is difficult. It requires effort and eternal vigilance lest the citizen find themselves enslaved by the very government they are supposed to control. It's far easier to cede that control to a centralized power thus absolving the citizen of any responsibility. Things not going so well in your life? Well now, it's the presidents fault. The individual doesn't have to take any responsibility for the consequences of the decisions they make.

It is true that a dictatorship (or absolute Monarchy) is the most efficient form of government known to man and a benevolent dictatorship is the preferable form of that type of government. The problem is the dictator dies, is assassinated, or by some other means removed from power and you are never quite certain how the new dictator is going to govern. Good, bad, or indifferent you're stuck with the SOB.

In a representative democracy and/or a federal republic the citizens have to argue their points and make their case to the general public, who gets to make the final decision at the polls. That takes time and effort, time and effort that, it seems, a large portion of our citizens just can't be bothered with.

Going forward it's going to be quite interesting to see what the public does with the freedoms and powers that have been returned to them.
 
Beauty of the 3 branches in action.

Scotus isnt there to speak for the majority, that’s Congress.
 
Hopefully this leads to new Amendments to return the rights that were just taken away (and the ones that will undoubtedly follow)
 
The recent Supreme Court session has returned more power to the people, either directly or through their elected representatives, than any court in recent history. Yet judging by many comments regarding the courts actions you would think that the collapse of civilization is nigh.

It seems to me that there is a large segment of our population that wants to be told what they can do and when they can do it by a president and the unelected drones of the bureaucracy. Of course some of these edicts are in the form of 'permissions' as well and who doesn't like 'permissions'? In other words they seem to prefer a dictatorship of sorts, as long as it's 'their' dictator.

Being a citizen of a nation of self-governing people is difficult. It requires effort and eternal vigilance lest the citizen find themselves enslaved by the very government they are supposed to control. It's far easier to cede that control to a centralized power thus absolving the citizen of any responsibility. Things not going so well in your life? Well now, it's the presidents fault. The individual doesn't have to take any responsibility for the consequences of the decisions they make.

It is true that a dictatorship (or absolute Monarchy) is the most efficient form of government known to man and a benevolent dictatorship is the preferable form of that type of government. The problem is the dictator dies, is assassinated, or by some other means removed from power and you are never quite certain how the new dictator is going to govern. Good, bad, or indifferent you're stuck with the SOB.

In a representative democracy and/or a federal republic the citizens have to argue their points and make their case to the general public, who gets to make the final decision at the polls. That takes time and effort, time and effort that, it seems, a large portion of our citizens just can't be bothered with.

Going forward it's going to be quite interesting to see what the public does with the freedoms and powers that have been returned to them.
Glad you’re so happy that the government is now free to take away peoples’ rights.
 
I think you should adopt the thinking that those”rights” have been ruled as in error and it is now up to the elected branches to consider how to best serve the will of the people.

Like a Referee saying offside, play nullified, 10 yard penalty, first down.
 
I think you should adopt the thinking that those”rights” have been ruled as in error and it is now up to the elected branches to consider how to best serve the will of the people.

Like a Referee saying offside, play nullified, 10 yard penalty, first down.
The rights were ruled to be incorrectly solidified and therefore should be codified another way.
 
I think you should adopt the thinking that those”rights” have been ruled as in error and it is now up to the elected branches to consider how to best serve the will of the people.

Like a Referee saying offside, play nullified, 10 yard penalty, first down.
Got it. There are rules now where they didn’t used to be rules and those extra rules give us more freedom. Makes perfect sense.
 
There will be only one outcome from this. Violence is inevitable. Exactly what a Fascist State demands so they can implement their final solution
 
Violent crimes happen every minute in the us and a…. Water off a judge’s back.
 
Glad you’re so happy that the government is now free to take away peoples’ rights.
In fairness to Lit's serial child killer, he has been promoting the restriction/reduction of the rights of non-White males for over 20 years here. Once non-whites have their ability to vote severely restricted, he will celebrate the enshrinement of the Permanent White Minority government.
 
Beauty of the 3 branches in action.

Scotus isnt there to speak for the majority, that’s Congress.
Who or what is the United States Supreme Court to speak for? The United States Constitution? The Constitution has been interpreted in different ways. If the Constitution had obvious meanings, Supreme Court decisions would nearly always be unanimous. They seldom are.

As long as the Supreme Court makes decisions one likes it is easy to imagine that it consists of nine sages of infinite wisdom who spend their days poring over ancient manuscripts in search of The Absolute Truth. Instead Supreme Court justices read their personal concerns into the vague meanings of the Constitution.

I dislike the Supreme Court as an institution. I particularly dislike it when the Supreme Court overturns popular legislation that has been in place for a long time. Roe vs Wade was an obvious example of this. So was Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. By enabling virtually unlimited campaign financing Citizens United increased the power of the plutocracy over the vast majority of voters.

The Supreme Court is a loose canon that can role in any direction, causing much damage. I trust the majority of the voters more than five Supreme Court justices who are appointed for life, and who can change their political opinions after joining the Court.
 
The recent Supreme Court session has returned more power to the people, either directly or through their elected representatives, than any court in recent history. Yet judging by many comments regarding the courts actions you would think that the collapse of civilization is nigh.

It seems to me that there is a large segment of our population that wants to be told what they can do and when they can do it by a president and the unelected drones of the bureaucracy. Of course some of these edicts are in the form of 'permissions' as well and who doesn't like 'permissions'? In other words they seem to prefer a dictatorship of sorts, as long as it's 'their' dictator.

Being a citizen of a nation of self-governing people is difficult. It requires effort and eternal vigilance lest the citizen find themselves enslaved by the very government they are supposed to control. It's far easier to cede that control to a centralized power thus absolving the citizen of any responsibility. Things not going so well in your life? Well now, it's the presidents fault. The individual doesn't have to take any responsibility for the consequences of the decisions they make.

It is true that a dictatorship (or absolute Monarchy) is the most efficient form of government known to man and a benevolent dictatorship is the preferable form of that type of government. The problem is the dictator dies, is assassinated, or by some other means removed from power and you are never quite certain how the new dictator is going to govern. Good, bad, or indifferent you're stuck with the SOB.

In a representative democracy and/or a federal republic the citizens have to argue their points and make their case to the general public, who gets to make the final decision at the polls. That takes time and effort, time and effort that, it seems, a large portion of our citizens just can't be bothered with.

Going forward it's going to be quite interesting to see what the public does with the freedoms and powers that have been returned to them.
I wholeheartedly agree. It's too bad there are many in society who'd rather delegate the maintenance of their freedom to a body of unelected administrators, whose primary motive is to expand its otherwise limited power through an ongoing reductive process of regulation that erodes the sovereignty and civil rights of the individual. You are correct to say that being a free citizen is not for the lazy, the faint of heart, or the selfish, it requires a collective sense of vigilance over the rights of our neighbors because the road he is forced to travel will be our road if we fail. The duty to reciprocate concern for the rights of our fellow citizens is the binding agent that holds the republic together. Freedom is a state of being that requires the duty, vigilance, and sacrifice, of all our citizens. If we get lazy stronger people will take it from us and subject us to their will. Ours is a great experiment never before attempted in human history. If we fail there is only the dustbin of history, whereas if we succeed we can change the course of human history and bring light to the long and dark chronology of our existence.
 
Back
Top