January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=60e7fec996ac42c6b843fd543eecc2d7

Merrick Garland's law professor, Laurence Tribe, predicts Garland will bring charges against trump.


On Thursday, CNN's Erin Burnett interviewed Laurence Tribe, professor emeritus at Harvard Law School where he taught for 52 years, teaching the Constitution to some of the most powerful people in America.

Tribe taught Jan. 6 select committee members Jaime Raskin (D-MD) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
"With the hearing today that focused so much on Trump causing violence against Pence, do you believe the committee has proven that Trump himself knowingly committed crimes?" Burnett asked.

"Without any doubt," Tribe said.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt, and the crimes are obvious. The most obvious was that he was ordering his vice-president to do what everyone in the room knew would be illegal, namely, exercise power to pick the next president. ... "But I do believe, though he's doing it meticulously and not as quickly as some would like, that Merrick Garland will approve criminal charges against this [Trump]," Tribe predicted.

 
entitlement, as expected by navarro

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=a2c9d9dd645b483cf756769535128702

navarro wants judge to hold off on his court case because he 'needs time to promote his book'

At Friday’s court hearing, Navarro’s attorney, John Irving, asked US District Judge Amit Mehta to hold off on setting a trial date. He said Navarro had just retained legal counsel and also needed time to promote a forthcoming book. Amazon lists a book by Navarro due out in September, titled “Taking Back Trump’s America: Why We Lost the White House and How We’ll Win It Back.”

“It is important to him for his livelihood,” Irving said, adding that the duties of promoting the book would “distract him” from helping his lawyers on the case.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=a2c9d9dd645b483cf756769535128702
Fact Check: Was Clarence Thomas the Lone dissenter on Trump Jan. 6th documents?
True.

Court rulings published in early 2022 show that Clarence Thomas was the only Supreme Court Justice who approved of former President Trump's demand to injunct documents requested by the House Select Committee investigating the U.S. Capitol attack of January 6.

and then there's this:
 
754, lock the fucker up. Let him promote his book from prison.
 
Amazon lists a book by Navarro due out in September, titled “Taking Back Trump’s America: Why We Lost the White House and How We’ll Win It Back.”
No doubt a work of fiction.
 
Prior to the Watergate break in Nixon's dirty tricks department succeeded in discrediting Edmund Muskie as a presidential candidate.
It pains me to come to the defense of Tricky Dicky, but he had nothing to do with derailing Muskie's campaign. That would be William Loeb (I'm surprised you're not familiar with him, you'd love his racist editorials).
 
It pains me to come to the defense of Tricky Dicky, but he had nothing to do with derailing Muskie's campaign. That would be William Loeb (I'm surprised you're not familiar with him, you'd love his racist editorials).

Woodward and Bernstein thought Nixon defined corruption. Then came Trump.​

The Washington Post, Perspective by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, June 5, 2022

With a covert budget of just $250,000, a team of undercover Nixon operatives derailed the presidential campaign of Sen. Edmund Muskie of Maine, the Democrats’ most electable candidate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/06/05/woodward-bernstein-nixon-trump/

ShoutRacist.jpg
 

Woodward and Bernstein thought Nixon defined corruption. Then came Trump.​

The Washington Post, Perspective by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, June 5, 2022

With a covert budget of just $250,000, a team of undercover Nixon operatives derailed the presidential campaign of Sen. Edmund Muskie of Maine, the Democrats’ most electable candidate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/06/05/woodward-bernstein-nixon-trump/

View attachment 2156185
Come back when you've at least googled William Loeb. I can tell from this that you haven't.
 
Come back when you've at least googled William Loeb. I can tell from this that you haven't.
I did an internet search for William Loeb before I posted my previous comment. I have disliked The New Hampshire Union Leader ever since I learned about it. William Loeb seems like a foul individual. Quote several of his comments that you think I would agree with. He might not have been all bad, but I doubt it.
 
I did an internet search for William Loeb before I posted my previous comment.
Then you know - or should know - that it was the "Canuck letter" that sank Muskie's campaign. Yes, Nixon's hatchet-men were involved, but they had no means to publish the letter. Loeb did, and there's no way he cared about its accuracy (of which we now know it had none).
 
Rusty Bowers, a Republican and Arizona state House speaker, will testify at a Tuesday hearing

Bowers will join Georgia’s election officials — Brad Raffensperger and Gabe Sterling — who will be part of a panel before the January 6 committee detailing Trump’s campaign to force states to overturn their certified election results.
Lofgren said:
“These individuals are Republicans. They voted for Trump. They are, you know, supported him,” she said. “But they wouldn’t do illegal things that he asked them to do. So we expect to hear in some detail about the pressure that was placed on them and why they were true to the law instead of the pressure.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=59e0c0e71b824d68b5aa6fcb9ff8fc2a
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...pc=U531&cvid=c902671aa9a14eba89c6437777bc2063

retired judge explains why he spoke so slowly yesterday, and it's exactly why i reasoned and told H. H wasn't alone in thinking there was something wrong with the man's health... he got lots of worried enquiries about his health and asking if he was recovering from a stroke. No, he was just heavily weighing every single word for history.

There were also concerns about his face being too red... lol, he enlightened everyone about that saying he'd caught the sun helping his daughter moving over the weekend, plus was concerned about not embarrassing himself being on national tv for the first time in more than 60 years.

"I like how this guy treats every line of his testimony like he's engraving it on a national monument. And frankly, he really *is* engraving it for history. And he seems to know it," Vanity Fair writer Joe Hagan wrote in a Twitter thread.

"I also respect, despite how halting he may sound, that Luttig is not setting himself up to be a mere soundbite maker. He's speaking to history, not TV," he wrote. "His sobriety, his graveness, his hallowedness, is so foreign to our modern sensibilities - but that's the point. That is the precise point."
Luttig responded with his appreciation of Joe Hagan's tweets and further explanations:
"What you could not know, and did not know, but I will tell you now, is that I believed I had an obligation to the Select Committee and to the country, first to formulate . . . then to measure . . . and then . . . to meter out . . .every . . . single . . . word . . . that I spoke . . . , carefully . . . exactingly . . . and . . . deliberately, so that the words I spoke were pristine clear and would be heard, and therefore understood, as such," he explained.

All of this said, I am not recovering from a stroke or any other malady, I promise. Thankfully, I have never been as sick or as so debilitated as that ever in my life, and would not want that for anyone. Knock on wood, I have never even been really sick a day in my life," he revealed.

"I was more ready, prepared and intellectually focused (I had thought) during Thursday's hearing than I have ever been for anything in my life. I gather my face appeared 'too red' for some on Twitter, betraying to them serious illness. The explanation was more innocent than that.At the last minute, I had been able during the weekend preceding my testimony to help my daughter get settled into her new home, where the temperatures were in the upper 90s, and where I was appreciatively, though unwittingly, to get just a little bit of needed suntan!" he wrote.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...pc=U531&cvid=c902671aa9a14eba89c6437777bc2063
 
No no no
Let Trump speak for ALL these people testifying under oath!!

Wait for him to try to pass the buck soon

“I never talked to him” “I would not recognize him”

Or simply the Reagan answer

“I do not recall”

As for Barr? F him up!! Don’t let him off for being Trump’s protector
 
All American Voters are equally culpable for letting that bum become your President.

Y’all need to shut the fuck up and become better Citizens.
 
Back
Top