January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

Once again you're just seeing what you want to see here. She had more than legitimate concerns about the two members she rejected, and she gave McCarthy the opportunity to name replacements. He chose to take his marbles and go home instead, and that's on him, period.
Yeah! she had legitimate concerns alright! LMFAO She was concerned that Banks and Jordan would insist on a deposition from the queen herself *Nancy Pelosi* and the Chuckster.
 
Loudermilk not off the hook: letter sent today to loudermilk from the committee

https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/2022-6-15.BGT Letter to Representative Loudermilk linked[10][6].pdf

That group stayed for several hours, despite the complex being closed to the public on that day. Surveillance footage shows a tour of approximately ten individuals led by you to areas in the Rayburn, Longworth, and Cannon House Office Buildings, as well as the entrances to tunnels leading to the U.S. Capitol. The below image shows you leading individuals on the tour: Individuals on the tour photographed and recorded areas of the complex not typically of interest to tourists, including hallways, staircases, and security checkpoints.1 For example, the below image shows an individual appearing to photograph a staircase in the basement of the Longworth House Office Building while you speak with others nearby
The below image shows members of the tour you led also taking photographs of the tunnel leading from the Rayburn House Office Building to the Capitol:

The Select Committee has learned that some individuals you sponsored into the complex attended the rally at the Ellipse on the morning of January 6, 2021. According to video recordings from that day obtained by the Select Committee, the individual who appeared to photograph a staircase in the Longworth House Office Building filmed a companion with a flagpole appearing to have a sharpened end who spoke to the camera saying, “It’s for a certain person,” while making an aggressive jabbing motion. Later, these individuals joined the unpermitted march from the Ellipse to the U.S. Capitol. While standing near the Capitol grounds, the same individual made a video that contained detailed and disturbing threats against specific Members of Congress.

For For Representative Barry Loudermilk Page 3 example, as the individual filmed the march to the Capitol, he said, “There’s no escape Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler. We’re coming for you.” As he looked up at the Capitol, he went on: They got it surrounded. It’s all the way up there on the hill, and it’s all the way around, and they’re coming in, coming in like white on rice for Pelosi, Nadler, even you, AOC. We’re coming to take you out and pull you out by your hairs. … When I get done with you, you’re going to need a shine on top of that bald head.2 While we had hoped to show you the video evidence when you met with us, and since you have thus far declined, the Select Committee provides the video in question for your review, which is available at this link.
decent, god fearin' church people.... uh huh
 
Last edited:
Do you have any objections to the reasons Pelosi cited for the two nominees she rejected? Are you even aware that she raised specific objections?

He does not. His sources don't include that kind of information.
 
hmmn, anyone notice any links between the areas being photographed as mentioned here:

Surveillance footage shows a tour of approximately ten individuals led by you to areas in the Rayburn, Longworth, and Cannon House Office Buildings, as well as the entrances to tunnels leading to the U.S. Capitol. The below image shows you leading individuals on the tour: Individuals on the tour photographed and recorded areas of the complex not typically of interest to tourists, including hallways, staircases, and security checkpoints
and the court documents in the case against the proud boys? here:
A document, titled “1776 Returns,” which federal prosecutors said was used by the leader of the Proud Boys, lays out a plan to occupy Capitol buildings on Jan. 6, 2021, using covert operators to let "patriots" inside government offices in an apparent effort to force a new election.
The document lists eight targets: the Supreme Court, the Russell Senate Office Building, the Dirksen Senate Office Building, the Hart Senate Office Building, the Cannon House Office Building, the Longworth House Office Building, the Rayburn House Office Building, and CNN.
sooooooooo, no coincidence AT ALL that loudermilk had a group of 10-15 people inside some of these buildings, taking photographs of stairways, tunnel entrances, security checkpoints when public tours were suspended due to covid, and at least 2 of those in that group marching on the Capitol Building, issuing threats and carrying a pointy weapon? anyone?
Under a section titled "Manpower Needs," the document lays out five different roles: (1) Lead: “Covert Sleeper, sets up fake appointment — is expected to spend the day as our insider and let people inside the building”; ... "Pack huge face masks & face shields, protect your identity," it reads. "If possible, be in building first thing in the morning. Be dressed in suits and unsuspecting, do not look tactical at all."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=c777619e85a942e39236a32662426cfd
 
Last edited:
Thursday 1pm ET for the next committee hearing, which will focus on the pressure brought to bear on mike pence by team trump to overturn election results

8pm ET

edit: damn, it's changed again to 1 ET or midday for CT... the second report must've messed up unless it's going to be shown then, too
 
Last edited:
Yeah! she had legitimate concerns alright! LMFAO She was concerned that Banks and Jordan would insist on a deposition from the queen herself *Nancy Pelosi* and the Chuckster.
It's like Godwin's Law in reverse with you. The moment you invoke Pelosi and/or Schumer, the debate is over and you won. Context doesn't matter at all.
In any event, I'll take your non-response as a concession that she did have legitimate concerns with Banks and Jordan. If not, it would be perfectly easy for you to defeat that argument, and you don't even try.
 
It's like Godwin's Law in reverse with you. The moment you invoke Pelosi and/or Schumer, the debate is over and you won. Context doesn't matter at all.
In any event, I'll take your non-response as a concession that she did have legitimate concerns with Banks and Jordan. If not, it would be perfectly easy for you to defeat that argument, and you don't even try.
It’s a one sided witch hunt. The committee didn’t follow house rules. It’s a shadow kangaroo show trial. Ive already went into detail on why it‘s important that Schumer and Pelosi give a deposition under oath on what happened before 1/6. Another Pelosi attempt at making sure Trump can’t run in 2024. I was always interested in finding the truth on what happened 1/6, and everyone in leadership positions should testify in front of a committee following its own rules. The minority leadership has a vested interest in putting their own people on the committee. Pelosi is a tyrannical leader and uses the house majority rule for her own political vengeance. What goes around comes around. Trust me when I say there is so much hatred towards Pelosi. Garland is shamefully weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI. DEMOCRATS are just digging a deeper hole. Dems have spent 6 years going after Trump, kind of reminds me of Nero. Democrats have ruined our country.
 
It’s a one sided witch hunt. The committee didn’t follow house rules. It’s a shadow kangaroo show trial. Ive already went into detail on why it‘s important that Schumer and Pelosi give a deposition under oath on what happened before 1/6. Another Pelosi attempt at making sure Trump can’t run in 2024. I was always interested in finding the truth on what happened 1/6, and everyone in leadership positions should testify in front of a committee following its own rules. The minority leadership has a vested interest in putting their own people on the committee. Pelosi is a tyrannical leader and uses the house majority rule for her own political vengeance. What goes around comes around. Trust me when I say there is so much hatred towards Pelosi. Garland is shamefully weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI. DEMOCRATS are just digging a deeper hole. Dems have spent 6 years going after Trump, kind of reminds me of Nero. Democrats have ruined our country.
You should really see someone about your grievances...it sounds like you're bottling it all up....poor guy

Pathetic #grievancePorn

Suck it up little camper
 
It’s a one sided witch hunt. The committee didn’t follow house rules. It’s a shadow kangaroo show trial. Ive already went into detail on why it‘s important that Schumer and Pelosi give a deposition under oath on what happened before 1/6. Another Pelosi attempt at making sure Trump can’t run in 2024. I was always interested in finding the truth on what happened 1/6, and everyone in leadership positions should testify in front of a committee following its own rules. The minority leadership has a vested interest in putting their own people on the committee. Pelosi is a tyrannical leader and uses the house majority rule for her own political vengeance. What goes around comes around. Trust me when I say there is so much hatred towards Pelosi. Garland is shamefully weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI. DEMOCRATS are just digging a deeper hole. Dems have spent 6 years going after Trump, kind of reminds me of Nero. Democrats have ruined our country.
Yes, I am aware that there is always plenty of hatred out there for any Democratic leader, particularly a woman. But no, there are no House rules stipulating that anyone is entitled to put members on a committee when they have a conflict of interest vis a vis what that committee is investigating. And as you know, McCarthy had the opportunity to name any other members of his caucus beside the two Pelosi rejected. He and he alone chose not to.
 
sorry, that's 8pm ET, so 7 for us central time folks

edit: LIVE at midday CT
 
Last edited:
Yes, I am aware that there is always plenty of hatred out there for any Democratic leader, particularly a woman. But no, there are no House rules stipulating that anyone is entitled to put members on a committee when they have a conflict of interest vis a vis what that committee is investigating. And as you know, McCarthy had the opportunity to name any other members of his caucus beside the two Pelosi rejected. He and he alone chose not to.
Th commission is a sham , I know it, you know it and the American people know it. Pelosi and her minions cannot deny the commission a deposition from Pelosi and Schumer. They were part of what happened 1/6. Her decisions before and during the civil disturbance were critical and need to be investigated. If she doesn’t avail herself to examination of the facts then the whole commission is a sham. Pelosi is not after the truth, she’s after Trump
 
Th commission is a sham , I know it, you know it and the American people know it. Pelosi and her minions cannot deny the commission a deposition from Pelosi and Schumer. They were part of what happened 1/6. Her decisions before and during the civil disturbance were critical and need to be investigated. If she doesn’t avail herself to examination of the facts then the whole commission is a sham. Pelosi is not after the truth, she’s after Trump
No, I do not know it and given the ratings the American people do not know it either. You've been asked to show where the rules demand they make Pelosi talk and really there is no reason to even question her at all. What is the information you would hope to get out of her?
 
related (as a contested election result--Wisconsin 2020) to this thread, gableman throws a fit in court and is now likely to be disbarred

Qn Wednesday, Republicans’ fake investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 election fell apart in the most spectacular manner possible. This implosion took the form of a stunning 25-page ruling that marks the end of this particular road for the state’s election deniers. After undergoing a full-on meltdown in open court, the man in charge of the partisan probe—former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman—is now at risk of losing his law license. His office faces fines of $2,000 a day. And the records surrounding his conspiracy-fueled 2020 election “investigation” that he has fought so hard to conceal from the public will soon see the light of day.

It is difficult to imagine a more humiliating conclusion to this sad chapter in Wisconsin history for those in the state pushing Trump’s Big Lie. The lawyers who were supposed to find evidence of fraud have destroyed their professional careers. The GOP politicians who supported this bogus audit are in contempt of court. And no one has produced an iota of evidence to suggest that Democrats stole the election. While attempting to discredit Joe Biden’s victory, Wisconsin Republicans have only bolstered its legitimacy.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=3ab50c09d1fc4426cd8a5051be12a7a3
 
Pelosi and her minions cannot deny the commission a deposition from Pelosi and Schumer. They were part of what happened 1/6. Her decisions before and during the civil disturbance were critical and need to be investigated.
Her decisions? You mean the decision to play her role in ratifying the results of the Electoral College? Yeah, nothing to investigate there. Biden won. Get over it.
 
Th commission is a sham , I know it, you know it and the American people know it. Pelosi and her minions cannot deny the commission a deposition from Pelosi and Schumer. They were part of what happened 1/6. Her decisions before and during the civil disturbance were critical and need to be investigated. If she doesn’t avail herself to examination of the facts then the whole commission is a sham. Pelosi is not after the truth, she’s after Trump
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LtJ5NVnwMHg/UGLI92XqfzI/AAAAAAAADNg/VSUG69_beuw/s1600/Idris-Elba.gif

I love it when you schmoes flail around with empty-calorie squawk trying to pad out the clock. :ROFLMAO:
 
It’s a one sided witch hunt. The committee didn’t follow house rules. It’s a shadow kangaroo show trial. Ive already went into detail on why it‘s important that Schumer and Pelosi give a deposition under oath on what happened before 1/6. Another Pelosi attempt at making sure Trump can’t run in 2024. I was always interested in finding the truth on what happened 1/6, and everyone in leadership positions should testify in front of a committee following its own rules. The minority leadership has a vested interest in putting their own people on the committee. Pelosi is a tyrannical leader and uses the house majority rule for her own political vengeance. What goes around comes around. Trust me when I say there is so much hatred towards Pelosi. Garland is shamefully weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI. DEMOCRATS are just digging a deeper hole. Dems have spent 6 years going after Trump, kind of reminds me of Nero. Democrats have ruined our country.
Trump wanted to be like Nero or Putin or Xi or Kim Ung, a true dictator. Trump ruined our country not the Democrats. Right off he gave a 21% tax cut to the rich which is still in effect while giving the lower and middle classes a tax break that would disappear in four years. He the refuses to denounce white supremacists who went buzzard on black protesters. He withheld vital information about how severe covid19 was until late March, early April when he knew about it in January 2020. He ignored all advice concerning precautions that should be employed to help prevent contracting or spreading covid19. He made one of his famous great deals with Opec, Mexico, and Russia to decrease oil production in order to drive up the price of oil. This deal was to expire April 2022. Gas prices inched up until now the oil companies are blaming summer demands, the war in Ukraine and sanctions against Russia. The truth is producing more gas costs more and they do not want to spend any of their profits to help lower gas prices. With covid19 came supply and delivery problems caused by both dock workers and truckers coming down with covid19. Along with covid19 Trump managed to kill over 1 million Americans of all ages. He gave Biden an unemployment rate sky high which Biden has managed to reverse. Trump and his Republican followers did everything they could to turn our Nation into a third world banana republic.
 
The January 6 committee has tried to get to the truth, but Trump used a non-existent power, executive privilege to block the committee's access to the truth. Nowhere in our Constitution will you find "Executive Privilege". It's an implied power. It has been used in the past to protect matters of National Security and ongoing federal investigations. Trump belongs in prison or in front of a firing squad like the traitor he is.
 
I've seen a few questions raised about whether or not Aunt Nan had a choice about using NatGuard people in advance of the raid, but I don't know how legitimate that all is.
 
I've seen a few questions raised about whether or not Aunt Nan had a choice about using NatGuard people in advance of the raid, but I don't know how legitimate that all is.
The request was made to the Capitol Police, therefore none of the minority or majority leaders were involved. At best, they heard about the request second or third hand.
 
The request was made to the Capitol Police, therefore none of the minority or majority leaders were involved. At best, they heard about the request second or third hand.
You don’t know what she knew. Until she sits in the hot seat and testifies under oath you don’t know shit. If the commission wants to get to the truth no one is off limits. Trump authorizing NG troops is a very valid line of questioning. Without cross examination this commission is a sham. Just another of Pelosi’s tyranny by political majority, another sham impeachment by proxi.
 
Back
Top