The present wave of immigration

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
Is no more dangerous and disruptive than any previous waves of immigrants. We can handle it.

We tend to forget about those previous waves, because America had such a strict immigration policy from the 1920s through the 1960s. But nothing is being said against Latinos or Muslims today, that was not said against the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the Poles, the Jews or the Chinese in the 19th Century. The Irish were innately stupid and violent and alcoholic, and their women were whores (which they were -- a product of the Irish migration wave, spurred by the potato famine, being a matter of atomized individuals without family support networks). The Germans were alcoholic. The Italians were natural criminals. The Irish, the (Catholic) Germans and the Italians were part of a Vatican plot to Catholicize a Protestant country -- the period equivalent of "replacement theory." The Chinese were just too different, too alien, to assimilate to American society, and threatened to overwhelm it by sheer numbers if not contained to China (much like what is said about Muslims today). The Poles were stupid (an attitude rooted in the Germans having got here first -- Germans have always looked down on Poles). And the Jews were, well, Jews.

And let's not get started on those dumbass Midwestern Scandahoovians.

In all cases, the language barrier was overcome, the cultural barriers were managed, and the immigrants' kids grew up as American as any Social Register WASP.
 
Last edited:
Of course, one difference is, except for the Chinese, all the 19th-Century waves of immigrants were white (assuming Jews count as white).
 
Of course, one difference is, except for the Chinese, all the 19th-Century waves of immigrants were white (assuming Jews count as white).
The vast majority of the surge of immigration that happened during the turn of the last century consisted of the two civilized races. Beginning the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty these had created the most advanced civilizations in world history. The two civilized rates are characterized by the highest IQ averages and the lowest rates of crime and illegitimacy everywhere in the world we live, even when we are poor.

Evolving in cold climates selects genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Evolving in civilizations selects genetically for intelligence, obedience to the law, and to a somewhat lesser extent, for monogamy. This is why the other races have found it impossible to fully emulate the two civilized races.

I am defining a civilization as a city based culture where the government has the effective monopoly on the legitimate use of violence.
 
The vast majority of the surge of immigration that happened during the turn of the last century consisted of the two civilized races. Beginning the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty these had created the most advanced civilizations in world history. The two civilized rates are characterized by the highest IQ averages and the lowest rates of crime and illegitimacy everywhere in the world we live, even when we are poor.

Evolving in cold climates selects genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Evolving in civilizations selects genetically for intelligence, obedience to the law, and to a somewhat lesser extent, for monogamy. This is why the other races have found it impossible to fully emulate the two civilized races.

I am defining a civilization as a city based culture where the government has the effective monopoly on the legitimate use of violence.
The present wave of immigrants are not going to degrade our gene pool.
 
Is no more dangerous and disruptive than any previous waves of immigrants. We can handle it.

We tend to forget about those previous waves, because America had such a strict immigration policy from the 1920s through the 1960s. But nothing is being said against Latinos or Muslims today, that was not said against the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the Poles, the Jews or the Chinese in the 19th Century. The Irish were innately stupid and violent and alcoholic, and their women were whores (which they were -- a product of the Irish migration wave, spurred by the potato famine, being a matter of atomized individuals without family support networks). The Germans were alcoholic. The Italians were natural criminals. The Irish, the (Catholic) Germans and the Italians were part of a Vatican plot to Catholicize a Protestant country -- the period equivalent of "replacement theory." The Chinese were just too different, too alien, to assimilate to American society, and threatened to overwhelm it by sheer numbers if not contained to China (much like what is said about Muslims today). The Poles were stupid (an attitude rooted in the Germans having got here first -- Germans have always looked down on Poles). And the Jews were, well, Jews.

And let's not get started on those dumbass Midwestern Scandahoovians.

In all cases, the language barrier was overcome, the cultural barriers were managed, and the immigrants' kids grew up as American as any Social Register WASP.
Your comment be received better with proper grammar:

Is no more dangerous and disruptive than any previous waves of immigrants. We can
handle it.

We tend to forget about those previous waves because America had such a strict
immigration policy from the 1920s through the 1960s.

But nothing is being said against Latinos or Muslims today, that was not said against the
Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the Poles, the Jews or the Chinese in the 19th Century.

The Irish were innately stupid and violent and alcoholic and their women were whores
(which they were -- a product of the Irish migration wave, spurred by the potato famine
being a matter of atomized individuals without family support networks).

The Germans were alcoholic. The Italians were natural criminals. The Irish, the (Catholic)
Germans and the Italians were part of a Vatican plot to Catholicize a Protestant country.

The Chinese were just too different, too alien, to assimilate to American society, and
threatened to overwhelm it by sheer numbers if not contained to China (much like what is
said about Muslims today).

The Poles were stupid (an attitude rooted in the Germans having got here first. Germans
have always looked down on Poles). And the Jews were, well, Jews.

In all cases, the language barrier was overcome, the cultural barriers were managed and
the immigrants' kids grew up as American as any Social Register WASP.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/34054352eb01141e3d5d21476005c868/tumblr_ogl3k4ok8E1qmob6ro1_400.gifv

- Jackie Mason
 
Evolving in cold climates selects genetically for intelligence and monogamy.
The white race is not distinguished by monogamy. DNA studies show about 5-10% of all people are offspring of some man other than their mother's husband or regular partner. This applies equally to all races, regions and social classes.
 
Your comment be received better with proper grammar:

Is no more dangerous and disruptive than any previous waves of immigrants. We can
handle it.

We tend to forget about those previous waves because America had such a strict
immigration policy from the 1920s through the 1960s.

But nothing is being said against Latinos or Muslims today, that was not said against the
Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the Poles, the Jews or the Chinese in the 19th Century.

The Irish were innately stupid and violent and alcoholic and their women were whores
(which they were -- a product of the Irish migration wave, spurred by the potato famine
being a matter of atomized individuals without family support networks).

The Germans were alcoholic. The Italians were natural criminals. The Irish, the (Catholic)
Germans and the Italians were part of a Vatican plot to Catholicize a Protestant country.

The Chinese were just too different, too alien, to assimilate to American society, and
threatened to overwhelm it by sheer numbers if not contained to China (much like what is
said about Muslims today).

The Poles were stupid (an attitude rooted in the Germans having got here first. Germans
have always looked down on Poles). And the Jews were, well, Jews.

In all cases, the language barrier was overcome, the cultural barriers were managed and
the immigrants' kids grew up as American as any Social Register WASP.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/34054352eb01141e3d5d21476005c868/tumblr_ogl3k4ok8E1qmob6ro1_400.gifv

- Jackie Mason
The two civilized races have higher IQ averages than the present batch, and lower rates of crime and illegitimacy.
 
I wish I shared your optimism about them.
I know you disparage the genetic code of "negroes," but bear in mind few of the present wave are African. Most are Latinos -- of predominantly American Indian blood. That's something we are long accustomed to having around.
 
Last edited:
Bottomline...if employers want to pay shit wages...they can either hire trailer park Republicans or immigrants. Since only immigrants are willing to show up and work...it is a no brainer.

If people don't want immigrants...punish those that hire them. No jobs...no immigrants. It isn't rocket science.
 
The UK is about to send people arriving illegally to Rwanda to have their claims for asylum considered.

So far 100 people have been identified as suitable and ten have asked to be sent back to their country of origin instead of Rwanda,

But there are many lawyers strenuously fighting for the immigrants and usually succeeding.

The government is about to change the law to make such protracted challenges illegal...
 
Shit wages are the result, partially, of turning a blind eye to illegal immigration.
Illegal immigration inflates the work force on the lower end of the spectrum and
allows employers to pay lower wages which becomes a feedback loop because
lower-wage employees have less purchasing power increasing the demand by
employers for even cheaper labor. Aggressively closing the border would result
in those at the bottom, i.e., native-born minorities and your "white trash" to
enjoy higher wages, but this is now a transitory problem...

The workforce, in the near, not the distant, future will increasingly become
robotized displacing a large part of our current work force at the bottom and
barring entry to first-time employment of even our legal workers at the bottom.

So, what are we going to do with all of those immigrants? Permanent welfare?
Can any state long endure by simply printing money for hands out for handouts?
 
The UK is about to send people arriving illegally to Rwanda to have their claims for asylum considered.

So far 100 people have been identified as suitable and ten have asked to be sent back to their country of origin instead of Rwanda,

But there are many lawyers strenuously fighting for the immigrants and usually succeeding.

The government is about to change the law to make such protracted challenges illegal...
I just read an article this morning about some genius, and this is an old theme, advocating that
disgruntled African Americans should move to Ghana(?) where they would not be subjected to
white violence and oppression. It would be much better done at the hands of black people I guess...

[Went to look for it: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...tired-us-hostility-consider-relocating-ghana/ ]
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Lol...more racism from our "Libertarian" jokester

Only wants those "white" immigrants.
 
Y'all on the Left really know how to stretch and get a lot of mileage out of that word.

You ignore the actual definition and the fact that I am a minority.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Back
Top