Cat Lover Seeks Advice About Bestiality

[DouglasFinney]

Howdy Perverts,

I'm writing an I/T contemporary fantasy serial about a coven of witch sisters who have a warlock brother. I plan for each of the siblings to have a cat familiar; each of the sisters will have a Molly while the brother (who is also the narrator) will have a Tom.

I think it would be pretty rude of me as the author to deny the clowder of frisky times. This is a novel for Lit, after all. I have, however, heard tail (sic) of Lit's bestiality prohibition, and I want to make sure that the fucking felines don't get me into trouble.

How much of kitty fun times am I allowed to show? I don't plan on any graphic sex scenes, but, were I writing this with no restrictions, I'd include coital caterwauls that echo through the house and grounds, surprise encounters when the humans interrupt a couple of their furry friends getting it on, and discussions between the narrator and his familiar about how the tabby gets far more pussy than the MC.

It doesn't seem to me that I'll be breaking any rules: there won't be anything explicit, and each species will only fuck their own—there will be no human on cat action, ergo, no bestiality, right? Moreover, the cats are also magical beings who are more than just felines, so wouldn't that technically make them NonHuman?

That said, I do have a healthy respect for the rules here and I don't want to try to lawyer my way into including feline fucking in my narrative. May I please ask for your opinion on whether or not I'll be operating within the letter and the spirit of the law? I don't want to run afoul of the rules on my first submission.

Thank you!

 

[Handley_Page]

If kitty turns into a humanoid for the purpose of sexual doings, I don't think you'll have much of a problem;
But it MUST be made Very Clear

 

[TarnishedPenny]

Bestiality, to me at least, involves sex between humans and animals (real ones, not mermaids or unicorns). I can’t see the site objecting to cats doing cats.

If you want to be sure, PM the site owner, Laurel and ask.

Good luck.

 

[gunhilltrain]

Aren't cats a bit on the small side for sex acts with humans? Goats and sheep I've heard of.

With dogs, it's probably a kind of mutual masturbation. The dog licks the human, while the human strokes - well, it only works on male dogs, I suppose. Licking a female dog; that doesn't seem very erotic. Neither does finger fucking said dog. In fact, all bestiality fails to be a fetish of mine.

 

[MrPixel]

...With dogs, it's probably a kind of mutual masturbation. The dog licks the human, while the human strokes - well, it only works on male dogs, I suppose. Licking a female dog; that doesn't seem very erotic. Neither does finger fucking said dog. In fact, all bestiality fails to be a fetish of mine.

Wellllllll... dogs are more "a thing" than you appear to surmise. Do an anonymous search (DuckDuckGo.com or other less-tracked search engine) for "dog fucking" and you evidently will be surprised. Also, a friend of my wife's who was a swinger introduced us to a guy who raised and trained his M/F pair of a larger breed for human female contact, the male for intercourse, the female for cunnilingus. We were, frankly, aghast. She (the friend) disclaimed any involvement, but we sorta had to wonder anyway as she was fairly libertine.

Nonetheless, it is out there, just illegal as hell in most jurisdictions.

 

[SimonDoom]

I think you can make this fly. The prohibition is against stories about sex with "real" animals. Contrary to what TP said, I think it would prohibit a story about cat-cat sex. But magical people who transform into cat-like beings would be more like werewolves, and werewolf stories definitely pass muster here.

 

[Bramblethorn]

I think you can make this fly. The prohibition is against stories about sex with "real" animals. Contrary to what TP said, I think it would prohibit a story about cat-cat sex. But magical people who transform into cat-like beings would be more like werewolves, and werewolf stories definitely pass muster here.

https://www.literotica.com/s/aalison-the-aardvark

 

[TheRedChamber]

From what you've described I don't think it would be a problem with ordinary cats - e.g a couple of lines here and there which indicate the cats are getting it on (and not say a three pages of steamy kitty love).

If anything I'd say being a familiar makes things slightly less clear? Can they talk?

 

[SimonDoom]

https://www.literotica.com/s/aalison-the-aardvark

Well, damn. I stand corrected. I hadn't read that story before.

It stings a little more to know that it's EB whose story proved me wrong.

But wait a minute . . . what is an Australian anteater? Is that an echidna?

Aardvarks, anteaters, and echidnas are completely unrelated. Interesting example of convergent evolution.

 

[DouglasFinney]

https://www.literotica.com/s/aalison-the-aardvark

This story is fabulous is all senses of the word. The slang was pitch perfect, and I dug the bit about Aalison's French lessons.

 

[DouglasFinney]

If anything I'd say being a familiar makes things slightly less clear? Can they talk?

The cats will be able to communicate with the spellcasters and with the other familiars. They will be able to understand spoken English, and they'll be able to express their thoughts to the humans telepathically, although each familiar will only be able to project to the human with whom she or he is paired.

 

[TxRad]

I've done the cat familiar thing already. The MC Warlock uses his male self and then uses feline female body at the same time to seduce a woman. It passed muster without a problem. Leave the cat on cat thing to a low key minimum and go with the shapeshifting.

 

[XerXesXu]

Aren't cats a bit on the small side for sex acts with humans?

A kitten'll suckle on a clitoris.

 

[ElectricBlue]

Well, damn. I stand corrected. I hadn't read that story before.

It stings a little more to know that it's EB whose story proved me wrong.

But wait a minute . . . what is an Australian anteater? Is that an echidna?

Aardvarks, anteaters, and echidnas are completely unrelated. Interesting example of convergent evolution.

Simon, I assure you that Bramble and I did not plan this, but fuckin' eh, I call that kharma. My day is made, and it's only 11:00 am.

Carry on .

 

[RetroFan]

Well, damn. I stand corrected. I hadn't read that story before.

It stings a little more to know that it's EB whose story proved me wrong.

But wait a minute . . . what is an Australian anteater? Is that an echidna?

Aardvarks, anteaters, and echidnas are completely unrelated. Interesting example of convergent evolution.

Echidnas were also called 'spiny anteaters' but this term is archaic, and you very rarely if ever hear anybody call them that here in Australia. Practically everyone calls them echidnas, I haven't heard anyone say 'spiny anteater' in many years.

 

[SimonDoom]

Echidnas were also called 'spiny anteaters' but this term is archaic, and you very rarely if ever hear anybody call them that here in Australia. Practically everyone calls them echidnas, I haven't heard anyone say 'spiny anteater' in many years.

Am I correct to assume that when one DOES refer to an "Australian anteater" one is referring to an echidna? It's an "anteater" in the functional sense, even if it's in no way related to South American anteaters.

It might be the second weirdest mammal, after the platypus, which surely is the weirdest. And of course it is in Australia.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Well, damn. I stand corrected. I hadn't read that story before.

I think I've encountered one or two other stories with animal-on-animal content, but that was the most memorable and easiest to search on.

That said, I wouldn't take it as a guarantee that Literotica would accept all animal-on-animal stories in all contexts. With no disrespect to EB that story is more humour than erotica and I could imagine Laurel having more issue with a story that was trying hard to sexualise animals.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Am I correct to assume that when one DOES refer to an "Australian anteater" one is referring to an echidna? It's an "anteater" in the functional sense, even if it's in no way related to South American anteaters.

Yes. Australia has other creatures that eat ants but none that are named "anteaters", AFAIK.

It might be the second weirdest mammal, after the platypus, which surely is the weirdest. And of course it is in Australia.

They're related; echidnas and platypuses are both monotremes, egg-laying mammals. Australia doesn't have a monopoly on echidnas though - they're also found in Papua New Guinea, our neighbour to the north.

 

[SimonDoom]

Yes. Australia has other creatures that eat ants but none that are named "anteaters", AFAIK.

They're related; echidnas and platypuses are both monotremes, egg-laying mammals. Australia doesn't have a monopoly on echidnas though - they're also found in Papua New Guinea, our neighbour to the north.

I know. I remember poring over books on animals as a kid many years ago and monotremes were the most peculiar of all mammals. They're venomous, too! One of the few types of mammals that are.

 

[ElectricBlue]

I think I've encountered one or two other stories with animal-on-animal content, but that was the most memorable and easiest to search on.

That said, I wouldn't take it as a guarantee that Literotica would accept all animal-on-animal stories in all contexts. With no disrespect to EB that story is more humour than erotica and I could imagine Laurel having more issue with a story that was trying hard to sexualise animals.

I'd be worried if people did think it erotic!

From memory, Steve first appeared in a daft story I wrote for Holiday1960 when she was feeling down about something. Although God only knows what I was thinking when I wrote this one - obviously something to get it placed at the top of an alphabetical list .

 

[holliday1960]

I'd be worried if people did think it erotic!

From memory, Steve first appeared in a daft story I wrote for Holiday1960 when she was feeling down about something. Although God only knows what I was thinking when I wrote this one - obviously something to get it placed at the top of an alphabetical list .

Yes, by all means, let's do NOT get this wrong, EB. Allison the Aardvark is MY story in the sense that it was written solely for MY amusement. It was a lark for us both, my dear. It's still 'my story', and shall forevermore remain so. (Who wouldn't adore an Aunt-Eater?) Thank you too much, Sir, for both the tribute and the fine example of literary excellence. No one, (including Laurel), could've mistaken the story for any part of serious erotica. It was never intended to be sexually stimulating.

Anyone who has read the vintage poem, 'The Piddling Pup' would understand the intended concept; Very tongue in cheek. I maintain, 'Allison' possesses the brilliance of an artist and is set apart from any ordinary writing.

As to the OP's topic, I disagree that werewolves are a good example for what the OP intends to project in their story. Werewolves are mythical. A shapeshifting human would be mythical as well. However, if I understand correctly, the OP intends to write about familiars, not shapeshifters, and to touch on their sexual experiences. A mere mention, vague, of them howling while engaged should be acceptable, but if it's detailed to the point that it intends to arouse the reader in a sexual way, I'm certain it would be rejected. Ambiguity and vagueness is key in this endeavor. On the other hand, an MC who becomes aroused by directly witnessing sex between two cats would definitely not be okay, according to what's implied by Lit rules. Again, the best thing to do is to write it, submit it, and see how Laurel interprets it.

@SD... as usual, you're overthinking things, again. Steve is merely an Aunt-eater, poor boy. His actual species is unimportant; tomato, tomahto... best regards in either case.

 

[SimonDoom]

@SD... as usual, you're overthinking things, again. Steve is merely an Aunt-eater, poor boy. His actual species is unimportant; tomato, tomahto... best regards in either case.

It's always nice to hear from you.

Overthinking is what I do best, so that's not likely to change. "Overthinking" shouldn't be confused with "good thinking," I admit. But correct taxonomy has an important role in erotica.

 

[oggbashan]

I have written animal on animal sex stories.

https://www.literotica.com/s/lesbian-spiders
https://www.literotica.com/s/white-scut


I have written a story with a mythical beast. It is only mythical in the sense that it is abyssal and cannot survive at sea level.

https://www.literotica.com/s/the-giant-squid

 

[ElectricBlue]

Yes, by all means, let's do NOT get this wrong, EB. Allison the Aardvark is MY story in the sense that it was written solely for MY amusement. It was a lark for us both, my dear. It's still 'my story', and shall forevermore remain so. (Who wouldn't adore an Aunt-Eater?) Thank you too much, Sir, for both the tribute and the fine example of literary excellence. No one, (including Laurel), could've mistaken the story for any part of serious erotica. It was never intended to be sexually stimulating.

EB looked at the rare spotting of Holliday, and thinks, thank goodness, the Cat with the twitching tail is still sitting in the porch rocking chair.

Truth be told, there is an unpublished story featuring Steve, as well as quite a few denizens of the AH that was. It will remain unpublished, as it is completely scurrilous.

A more recent tribute to Holliday is here:

https://literotica.com/s/the-fantastic-hotel-pt-02

 

[TarnishedPenny]

I have written animal on animal sex stories.

https://www.literotica.com/s/lesbian-spiders
https://www.literotica.com/s/white-scut


I have written a story with a mythical beast. It is only mythical in the sense that it is abyssal and cannot survive at sea level.

https://www.literotica.com/s/the-giant-squid

You are a walking Rule 34, sir.