Trump took documents so sensitive that they cannot even be described to the public Breaking a slew of laws

after he left office, and the National Archives are quite clear on this matter: "the records should not have been removed from the White House"

Presidential Records Act: requires presidents and White House staff to preserve official documents and communications, and turn those items over to the Archives at the end of a president's term.


he clearly believed he was to be re-elected, and then–when that didn't happen–that the results of 2022 that actually came in would overturned so he could stay in the job, and didn't want the Biden administration (who were supposed to have been got up to date on all current stuff prior to the confirmation of President Biden) to see anything important or useful.
1. The documents weren't removed from the White House AFTER Biden was sworn in, they were taken to Mara Lago while Trump was still President.

2. The docs were collected and returned to the National Archives without interference once Trump was no longer President.
 
1. The documents weren't removed from the White House AFTER Biden was sworn in, they were taken to Mara Lago while Trump was still President.

2. The docs were collected and returned to the National Archives without interference once Trump was no longer President.
Records of gifts received by Trump, Pence, Pompeo and others are still missing.
 
1. The documents weren't removed from the White House AFTER Biden was sworn in, they were taken to Mara Lago while Trump was still President.

2. The docs were collected and returned to the National Archives without interference once Trump was no longer President.
That's all the democrats/media have to run on this fall. "Look, there's a butterfly."
 
Records of gifts received by Trump, Pence, Pompeo and others are still missing.
Under federal law, government employees are required to disclose any gifts from foreign governments with a value of over $415 to prevent bribery and undue influence.

The Trump administration's failure to provide the information is the latest example of its tendency to flout rules and norms.
"It's flagrant, and it looks terrible," Richard W. Painter, the former top ethics lawyer for George W. Bush's administration, told The New York Times. "Either it was really stupid or really corrupt."
both, probably

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=68fdb01bd9eb4059acf5ab9fe75db5b6
 
Last edited:
People were quite open about wanting to elect people from outside any prior government service. Although the Trump people were also corrupt and criminal (and known to be before they were elected) ignorance of/indifference for what is legal as a public official is a natural result of the person not having any prior government service.
 
1. The documents weren't removed from the White House AFTER Biden was sworn in, they were taken to Mara Lago while Trump was still President.

2. The docs were collected and returned to the National Archives without interference once Trump was no longer President.
The docs were not known until a subpoena required a search. Trump only gave them up after being requested.
 
You seem angry.
Lol, not even close when it comes to the bigoted little phuckwad.

But then again, that's your go-to claim anytime you need a little dig at someone, isn't it? Why is that? Projection on your part maybe?
 
A well reasoned argument from a top lawyer (SARCASM)
As in most things legal or otherwise, the backstory is very important for context. Otherwise all you get are stupid idiots who only read headlines (an no further) and think they know what the hell is going on and that they're an "expert" on the subject at hand.

Kind of like you who isn't even close to being "Dom" anything. Ain't that right "little d"?
 
The docs were not known until a subpoena required a search. Trump only gave them up after being requested.
So, the law requires that the archives retrieve the docs and Trump complied with the retrieval when it was made known to him.

How is this a problem except in your TDS afflicted head?
 
So, the law requires that the archives retrieve the docs and Trump complied with the retrieval when it was made known to him.

How is this a problem except in your TDS afflicted head?
The law requires that he turn over docs at the end of his Presidency. As a private citizen, he does not have authority to maintain possession.

Why do you believe the problem is on my side? The DoJ has already expressed interest, so they're the ones with the problem.
 
It must be great comfort to Trump that an attorney on a porn board is defending him so vigorously. If only Hillary could have obtained Harpy's services when she was being crucified during an election for using a private server. No way any federal official should ever be allowed to obscure their communications!

Hillary sure could have used some help when Trump publicly appealed to Putin to "find the missing emails", but Harpy has such high ethical standards for his world-renowned consulting services.
 
The law requires that he turn over docs at the end of his Presidency. As a private citizen, he does not have authority to maintain possession.

Why do you believe the problem is on my side? The DoJ has already expressed interest, so they're the ones with the problem.
Are you saying that he never turned over the docs? Because that's not what's being reported.

Or, are you saying that because he didn't take the initiative before his presidency ended that he's guilty of not turning over the docs? Only, that's not what the law requires.

Or, are you saying that because it took so long for the National Archives to get their shit together and ASK if he had any docs, it's somehow Trump's fault the archives are incompetent buffoons?


And of course the DOJ is soooooo interested in the former Prez having documents after his presidency ended while they're ignoring Hunter's laptop. It's like... something... something... OH! I know... it's like they've got him now...

🤣
 
I never said he did, dumbass.
Still not comprehending what's going on?

You should work on that instead of jacking your jaw before your brain catches up with needing to swallow your breakfast first.
 
Are you saying that he never turned over the docs? Because that's not what's being reported.

Or, are you saying that because he didn't take the initiative before his presidency ended that he's guilty of not turning over the docs? Only, that's not what the law requires.

Or, are you saying that because it took so long for the National Archives to get their shit together and ASK if he had any docs, it's somehow Trump's fault the archives are incompetent buffoons?


And of course the DOJ is soooooo interested in the former Prez having documents after his presidency ended while they're ignoring Hunter's laptop. It's like... something... something... OH! I know... it's like they've got him now...

🤣
Since he was in possession of them, then he did not turn them over when he was supposed to. That's correct.

That would also be why the DoJ is involved.

There is not a stipulation that says that the National Archives are required to request the docs in order for the ex President to perform the requirement of the completion of his term.
 
Since he was in possession of them, then he did not turn them over when he was supposed to. That's correct.

That would also be why the DoJ is involved.

There is not a stipulation that says that the National Archives are required to request the docs in order for the ex President to perform the requirement of the completion of his term.
Got it.

You believe that Trump is guilty of removing docs from the White House while President because he didn't return them BEFORE his Presidency ended.

Except that's not the way it works or the way the law is worded.


From my vantage point it appears that, once again, you begin with the desired TDS spawned end result and work backward toward fabricating a rationale to support that desired end result while ignoring reality and the law in the process.

Being backward isn't a good thing. Being backward while suffering from TDS is even worse.
 
Got it.

You believe that Trump is guilty of removing docs from the White House while President because he didn't return them BEFORE his Presidency ended.

Except that's not the way it works or the way the law is worded.


From my vantage point it appears that, once again, you begin with the desired TDS spawned end result and work backward toward fabricating a rationale to support that desired end result while ignoring reality and the law in the process.

Being backward isn't a good thing. Being backward while suffering from TDS is even worse.
When he left the office of the white house with documents, he broke the law.

Does that clear things up or do you need picture cards?

If Obama was in possession of documents on Jan 22, 2017, he also would've been breaking the law

From your "vantage point" it seems that the position I mentioned above is predicated on who the violator of the law is, which is incorrect.
 
Still not comprehending what's going on?

You should work on that instead of jacking your jaw before your brain catches up with needing to swallow your breakfast first.
What part of "I never said that" are you having trouble with?
 
Back
Top