NYTs Doesn't Care That We Now Know Big Tech Rigged The Election

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,310

The New York Times Doesn’t Care If You Know That Big Tech Helped Rig Joe Biden’s Election

BY: JOY PULLMANN
MARCH 21, 2022

On March 17, 2022, The New York Times stated it had verified the authenticity of a laptop and its data as belonging to the president’s son, Hunter Biden. This was the same laptop holding information that Twitter, Facebook, and other corporate media immediately suppressed when The New York Post, a right-leaning competitor of The New York Times, reported on it three weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

If they had known about one of the Biden family scandals, such as the Hunter Biden laptop information, 17 percent of Joe Biden’s voters wouldn’t have voted for him, found a 2020 post-election poll. This means big tech’s suppression of this story likely made enough difference to tip Joe Biden into his low-margin win in the Electoral College.


Back in October 2020, Twitter and Facebook immediately responded to The New York Post’s publication of information from Hunter Biden’s laptop by effectively banning it from their platforms that effectively monopolize public discussion. Twitter punished the Post for reporting the repeatedly authenticated laptop information by suspending its account for two weeks.

“What this means is that, in the crucial days leading up to the 2020 presidential election, most of the corporate media spread an absolute lie about The New York Post’s reporting in order to mislead and manipulate the American electorate,” commented independent investigative reporter Glenn Greenwald.

Major National Security Implications

That laptop provides evidence Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden’s pay-for-play schemes with foreign oligarchs, an obvious national security risk. Some of these corrupt deals involved Ukraine, a notoriously corrupt country that is currently petitioning the Biden administration to engage militarily with Russia on their behalf.

More here:

https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/2...that-big-tech-helped-rig-joe-bidens-election/

This is the NYTs trying to claw back its integrity without an apology for their being complicit in the conspiracy.
 
That laptop provides evidence Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden’s pay-for-play schemes with foreign oligarchs, an obvious national security risk.
Ok, this part is really important. We can’t allow those foreign oligarchs to be controlling American politicians. I want the names of all those foreign oligarchs now.
 
This isn't more bullshit about Hunter's laptop, is it?! :rolleyes:
It’s bullshit about unnamed foreign oligarchs posing a national security risk.
As if a foreigner can do more harm to an American politician’s reputation than his own domestic peers.
 
Put it this way: We have much more and better reason to suppose Trump is Putin's puppet, than we have to ascribe any political significance at all to the contents of Hunter's laptop.
 
The number of things that led to the previous President's loss is vast....in your head.

Votes are the only thing that led to it.
Yes, votes motivated and informed by the disinformation campaign conducted by Intel Community fascists, Big Tech, and the captive Democrat media.
 
don't forget the deep state that controlled the Russian oligarchs who instigated Italygate at the behest of Venezuelan dark interests
 
Yes, votes motivated and informed by the disinformation campaign conducted by Intel Community fascists, Big Tech, and the captive Democrat media.
Sorry, but I don't know a single person who doubted the laptop was Hunter's....and that includes people who don't keep up on politics.

They do not, however, believe the Clinton Cash dude who "has the receipts" that show Hunter colluding with his dad to get rich.

But hey...you keep believing the bullshit.... nothing was rigged
 
Every word of that is nonsense.
No it isn't and you know it. Already there are polls of Democrats saying if they knew about the laptop they wouldn't have voted for Biden and it's around 9.5%, enough to change the outcome of the election.
 
No it isn't and you know it. Already there are polls of Democrats saying if they knew about the laptop they wouldn't have voted for Biden and it's around 9.5%, enough to change the outcome of the election.
It is nonsense to speak of "Intel Community fascists, Big Tech, and the captive Democrat media."

It is also nonsense for you to pretend you care what's on Hunter's laptop. You don't, except insofar as it can provide you with a political weapon. You do not really care whether the president is compromised, or whatever it is you're trying to prove.
 
Last edited:
How did all those people not hear about it? You guys on the right and right wing media at the time wouldn't shut up about the laptop or hunter and Biden's corruption.
 
How did all those people not hear about it? You guys on the right and right wing media at the time wouldn't shut up about the laptop or hunter and Biden's corruption.
It seems to be saying that the voters would have actually believed it, if it came from the NYT.
 
Ok, this part is really important. We can’t allow those foreign oligarchs to be controlling American politicians. I want the names of all those foreign oligarchs now.
Doesn’t anybody know who the compromising foreign oligarchs are? I’m starting to think that they don’t exist.
 
I thought it was the dominion voting machines? Or was it the voting ballots shipped in from China? Or the fake ballots shipped in from other states? Or the server in Germany that was used to change votes? Or the hacking that was done to machines hooked up to the internet?

Or maybe it's the fact that Trump was the worst president in our history who was completely mentally, morally and intellectually unfit for office?

Hmmmm.
 
soooo...if Big Tech is so powerful and vast, why didn't Big Tech help Hillary win? It's only a four-year diff.

was the tech smaller then, or..?

maybe we should be calling them "Bigger Tech" now? :unsure:
 
Sorry, but I don't know a single person who doubted the laptop was Hunter's....and that includes people who don't keep up on politics.

They do not, however, believe the Clinton Cash dude who "has the receipts" that show Hunter colluding with his dad to get rich.

But hey...you keep believing the bullshit.... nothing was rigged
Lol, you really are clueless.

What you don't know, yet post about, is legion

Or, are you trying to assert that just because you're completely ignorant, that means something never happened?
 
Back
Top