For Those Lefties Lying About The Arizona Election

[Sean Renaud]

Hahahaha! And you have kids!!!

The cryass LibTards cried foul for four years when DJT butt fucked that miserable cunt. They threw EVERYTHING they had at Trump and NOTHING stuck. Now you claim, in the face of MASSIVE evidence of election fraud, that somehow BiDim got more legit votes than Trump. LOL! Ok. According to PMSNBC, CNN etc. Trump got 70 + million votes and BiDim got 81 million votes, dying an election with 133 million registered voters. You do the math if you’re capable but those numbers don’t square. “Nothing to see here” says PurpleNurple. Covid “vaccines” work! Right on, you pussy! Report me and fuck the hell off, shitstain!

Yeah DJT was a VERY bad president and the only reason it didn't stick is because the Republicans have very little in the way of honor in any real sense of the word. Besides we didn't deny he won. We bitched about the EC but we do that a fair bit even when we win. Its a dated system. We KNOW there was Russian interference but Hillary (or Obama on behalf of Hillary) didn't call for recounts and audits all day and all night.

 

[phrodeau]

Trump knows that he lost, and that Joe Biden is now the President. He has to, or else he could never complain about the job Biden’s doing.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm competent and sane, at least by comparison to any other self-ID'd lawyer I've seen post on this board.

Lol, let's see you post YOUR credentials on the board.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Lol, let's see you post YOUR credentials on the board.

His credentials don't make yours any more legitimate, RAPEY.

 

[Rightguide]

We know Joe Biden won the election, but this is how he did it:

Breaking: Special Counsel Finds Mark Zuckerberg’s Election Money Violated Wisconsin Bribery Laws​

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND
MARCH 01, 2022

Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

Last August, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos authorized the Office of Special Counsel, headed by retired state Supreme Court justice Michael Gableman, to investigate concerns about election integrity and the 2020 election. Gableman delivered an interim report to the state assembly on November 10, 2021. Earlier today, the special counsel provided a second interim report to the state legislative body, noting the report “is final in the sense that it provides a list of recommendations with time for the Legislature to act before the close of its session in March.”


While the special counsel’s nearly 150-page report closed with recommendations for the state’s legislative body, Gableman stressed from the get-go that the report did not seek to re-analyze the re-count that occurred in late 2020. Nor was the report’s purpose to challenge certification of the presidential election. Rather, the report represented a small step toward fulfilling “the duty of all citizens of our State and our nation to work hard to secure our democracy for this generation and the next,” the special counsel explained.

From the details exposed in Monday’s special counsel report, the state legislature has much work to do to address “the numerous questionable and unlawful actions of various actors in the 2020 election.” The first unlawful action, according to the report, concerned the payment of grant funds to five Wisconsin counties that were used to facilitate voting. That arrangement, Gableman wrote, violated Wis. Stat. § 12.11, which prohibits election bribery by providing it is illegal to offer anything of value to or for any person in order to induce any elector to go to the polls or vote.

According to the report, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg providing financing that allowed the Center for Tech and Civic Life to offer nearly $9 million in “Zuck Bucks” to Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay counties. In exchange, the “Zuckerberg 5,” as the report called the counties, in effect, operated Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts. Those grant funds then paid for illegal drop boxes to be placed in Democratic voting strongholds.

More here:

https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/0...ection-money-violated-wisconsin-bribery-laws/

 

[Rotadom]

We know Joe Biden won the election, but this is how he did it:

https://c.tenor.com/5h_LKfWmEYcAAAAC/bobsburgers-fox.gif

 

[pecksniff]

"Illegal drop boxes" ain't exactly what you'd call a problem with our election system. There ought to be drop boxes conveniently placed for practically everybody.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Let's assume this is true. That's fine, Zuckerberg broke the law, the dems almost definitely knew about it. I'm not sure how this is different from Russia in 2016 though. It doesn't change the way the votes actually went, it just means there was undue influence.

The Left has been trying minimize money in politics for over a decade.

 

[Goldenfinger]

I can take almost All my CC signatures and compare them to my signature on a legal document and get no matches.

 

[Rightguide]

"Illegal drop boxes" ain't exactly what you'd call a problem with our election system. There ought to be drop boxes conveniently placed for practically everybody.

Except they're illegal and so is Bribery.

 

[YDB95]

Except they're illegal and so is Bribery.

They've been declared illegal in one state, and not for reasons having anything to do with bribery or anything else the least bit unethical. The question in Wisconsin is simply whether they were an acceptable option when the state legislature hadn't permitted them by name.

 

[HisArpy]

"Illegal drop boxes" ain't exactly what you'd call a problem with our election system. There ought to be drop boxes conveniently placed for practically everybody.

Illegal is illegal. No one gets to selectively commit a crime and get a pass for it because it's "only a little bit illegal."

And then there's the fact that no one should be allowed to "profit" from their illegal actions.

 

[HisArpy]

The question in Wisconsin is simply whether they were an acceptable option when the state legislature hadn't permitted them by name.

No, it isn't.

THE question is whether the election commissioner changing the law to allow them was ILLEGAL or not.

Under Wisconsin law, the election commissioner had no authority to do so. Thus, the placing of the drop boxes was illegal. Under the law EVERY ballot that was placed in one is ineligible to be counted. Counting them compounded the illegality of the commissioner.

 

[HisArpy]

I can take almost All my CC signatures and compare them to my signature on a legal document and get no matches.

Good for you.

Too bad that's not good enough to cast an absentee ballot.

 

[Rightguide]

They've been declared illegal in one state, and not for reasons having anything to do with bribery or anything else the least bit unethical. The question in Wisconsin is simply whether they were an acceptable option when the state legislature hadn't permitted them by name.

In the cases mentioned in the article, they were found to be illegal and so was Zuckerberg's reported bribery.

 

[YDB95]

First of all, Biden still would have been elected if he'd lost Wisconsin.
That aside, the question is, would people who voted by drop-box have still voted if that option hadn't been available? There is no way to answer that with any precision, but given how high turnout was nearly everywhere, most of them probably would have. And what happened does not meet any reasonable definition of "bribery" as far as the voters were concerned. They simply took the most convenient option for voting, as everyone would.

 

[pecksniff]

"Ballot harvesting" is not a problem with our election system either, whether legal or illegal.

 

[HisArpy]

In the cases mentioned in the article, they were found to be illegal and so was Zuckerberg's reported bribery.

But it was only a little bit illegal...

 

[Rotadom]