For Those Lefties Lying About The Arizona Election

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
66,985
Nothing happened in Arizona, right?

Arizona Senate study estimates 200k ballots counted in 2020 with mismatched signatures​

Estimate is more than eight times the number of mismatches acknowledged by the county.

A study of Maricopa County's mail ballots in Arizona's 2020 presidential election estimates that more than 200,000 ballots with mismatched signatures were counted without being reviewed, or "cured" — more than eight times the 25,000 signature mismatches requiring curing acknowledged by the county.

Commissioned by the Arizona State Senate, the signature verification pilot study was conducted by Shiva Ayyadurai's Election Systems Integrity Institute, which released its final report to the public on Tuesday. Ayyadurai is an engineer and entrpreneur with four degrees from MIT who bills himself as the inventor of email, a claim which critics have alleged is exaggerated.

Of the 1,911,918 early voting mail ballots that Maricopa County received and counted in the 2020 presidential election, the county reported that 25,000, or 1.3%, had signature mismatches that required curing, but only 587 (2.3%) of those were confirmed mismatched signatures.

Under Maricopa County election rules, a reviewer first compares a signature on an envelope with the signature on file for the voter, which takes about 4-30 seconds. If the signature does not appear to match, the ballot is cured, which takes three or more minutes and includes attempts to contact the voter to determine whether or not the signature is a match.

In the signature verification study, three expert forensic document examiners and three novices reviewed 499 images of early voting mail ballot envelopes to determine if the signatures on them matched with the signatures on file. All the reviewers agreed that 60 of the 499 envelopes, or 12% were signature mismatches.

More here:

https://justthenews.com/politics-po...-ballots-mismatched-signatures-not-cured-2020
 
More speculative extrapolation based on incomplete information. Good try though...

All you're basically saying is that you want to end mail in voting.

It's not going away
 
Just the News

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
 
Just the News

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Just like the OP ;)
 
Just the News

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Don't fall for that propaganda. John Solomon is a well-respected award-winning investigative reporter who has worked for the AP, WaPo, TWT, and The Hill. The left turned against him when he propagate the lies about Trump. Don't be stupid, attack the facts if you can.
 
Don't fall for that propaganda. John Solomon is a well-respected award-winning investigative reporter who has worked for the AP, WaPo, TWT, and The Hill. The left turned against him when he propagate the lies about Trump. Don't be stupid, attack the facts if you can.
Lol.....you're funny. You have no facts....your have speculative analysis.
 
Don't fall for that propaganda. John Solomon is a well-respected award-winning investigative reporter who has worked for the AP, WaPo, TWT, and The Hill. The left turned against him when he propagate the lies about Trump. Don't be stupid, attack the facts if you can.
Yes, he's propagating lies. What's your point?
 
Reading into it, it looks like the study I used photographs of EVBs..not even the real thing. How do they get a margin of error of 4%?
 
Don't fall for that propaganda. John Solomon is a well-respected award-winning investigative reporter who has worked for the AP, WaPo, TWT, and The Hill. The left turned against him when he propagate the lies about Trump. Don't be stupid, attack the facts if you can.

I will when you stop linking bullshit sources to back your claims.

But why is it you can only use bullshit sources?

We know why! :cool:
 
" the signature verification pilot study was conducted by Shiva Ayyadurai's Election Systems Integrity Institute, which released its final report to the public on Tuesday. Ayyadurai is an engineer and entrpreneur with four degrees from MIT who bills himself as the inventor of email, a claim which critics have alleged is exaggerated."

When even Just the News can't deny that their sources are less than honest...
 
As for the story itself, it doesn't pass my Google test: if you Google it and page 1 of the results is full of right-wing sites repeating the same story word for word and nothing else, it's probably bullshit.
 
I can't believe we are still talking about this...

...and by the way, what about all the evidence that the Bengals actually won the Super Bowl that was blatantly IGNORED by the pro-Rams media????
 
Do we feel bad for Reichguide yet?

Honestly? Kind of. I mean, it must be wonderfully convenient to always see everything you want to see in everything you read, but I'll bet it often comes back to bite you in the ass.
 
Don't know, and at this point don't care, if the study is good or not.

What I see is a bunch of assholes desperately rallying behind Ad Hom in order to avoid discussing the issue.

Talk about weak sauce...
 
Don't know, and at this point don't care, if the study is good or not.

What I see is a bunch of assholes desperately rallying behind Ad Hom in order to avoid discussing the issue.

Talk about weak sauce...
There's no "issue" RAPEY. vettebitch is being a whiny cunt about something that has been over for a year.
 
I will when you stop linking bullshit sources to back your claims.

But why is it you can only use bullshit sources?

We know why! :cool:
You're just a coward who cannot think for yourself. Every time you read something uncomfortable you pitifully try and tell us the source is flawed instead of his facts. You're both lazy and an intellectual coward.
 
Back
Top