When guns are illegal………

This just begs to question what exactly it would look like if "guns were legal"
 
So, how does seizing all of those trucks and jailing the drivers help the supply chain problem?


Canadian protesters defy order to end border bridge blockage
By Evan Simko-Bednarski and Jesse O’Neill
February 11, 2022 6:19pm

Canadian trucker protestors blocking a bridge connecting Ontario and Michigan decided to defy a court order to clear the route on Friday night, despite warning from police that those refusing to comply could face fines or prison.

By early Saturday, the crowd had thinned out but was still standing as a party atmosphere intensified. Police were in the area but did not move in on the demonstrators.

The so-called “Freedom Convoy,” involving hundreds of people and a few dozen trucks, had been blocking traffic from the Ambassador Bridge for five days in protest of COVID-19 mandates, forcing plant closures and work stoppages in Detroit, Michigan, and Windsor, Ontario, because materials can’t get across the border.

Ontario Superior Court Chief Justice Geoffrey Morawetz issued an injunction following a four-and-a-half hour hearing at which attorneys for the city of Windsor and auto-parts makers argued that the protest was causing undue economic harm. The order went into effect at 7 p.m. Friday.

Windsor police immediately warned that those taking part in the blockade could be arrested or have their vehicles seized.

https://nypost.com/2022/02/11/canadian-judge-orders-border-bridge-clear/
 
So, how does seizing all of those trucks and jailing the drivers help the supply chain problem?

They're blocking the supply chain and they aren't actively participating in it, so removing them would be an improvement.
 
I'm going to demand that this be the tactic the next time an autonomous zone pops up in America.

...move in with bulldozers.
 
Hence my question....why would guns make a difference in this case?

Did I say they would? I don't know what is going to happen on that bridge, but if they attempt to seize all of those trucks and jail all of those protesters, Trudeau is probably face his own Ceausescu moment and be run out of the government.
 
They're blocking the supply chain and they aren't actively participating in it, so removing them would be an improvement.

They are the "supply chain" and yes they aren't participating. They've said they aren't until the mandates are dropped. Nobody is going to step up to drive those seized trucks.
 
Did I say they would? I don't know what is going to happen on that bridge, but if they attempt to seize all of those trucks and jail all of those protesters, Trudeau is probably face his own Ceausescu moment and be run out of the government.

I was talking to the OP, hence why I quoted him. He inferred there is a difference.

They're breaking the law and disrupting traffic, police have every right to.

Politically it might not be the best...but legally it is.
 
They are the "supply chain" and yes they aren't participating. They've said they aren't until the mandates are dropped. Nobody is going to step up to drive those seized trucks.

But the ones that will drive trucks and are actively being blocked by those who aren't, will be free to do so.

So it would be better for the supply chain, logically
 
I'm going to demand that this be the tactic the next time an autonomous zone pops up in America.

...move in with bulldozers.

Are you saying that this wasn't your position previously?

I agree....protests don't require law breaking.
 
They're blocking the supply chain and they aren't actively participating in it, so removing them would be an improvement.
exactly. the protestors represent the very small minority–approx 10-15%–of truckers operating in Canada and are holding up both the Canadian and American economies by blocking the flow of trade across the border. The ones at the bridge are reported as numbering fewer than 100, yet are causing billions of dollars worth of trade to be stalled. Get them out of the way and the other 85-90% of truckers can get on with their daily business and work.

For all those rah-rahing the protestors, not a one of them is commenting on how they are preventing the huge majority of truckers (almost all vaccinated) from earning their livings.
 
I'm going to demand that this be the tactic the next time an autonomous zone pops up in America.

...move in with bulldozers.
So you’re promoting anarchy in another thread, and you’re opposed to autonomous zones in this one.
 
I was talking to the OP, hence why I quoted him. He inferred there is a difference.

They're breaking the law and disrupting traffic, police have every right to.

Politically it might not be the best...but legally it is.

There's a difference between their side of the border and ours. Protest is tolerated more here than in Canada.
 
But the ones that will drive trucks and are actively being blocked by those who aren't, will be free to do so.

So it would be better for the supply chain, logically

I don't think there are many who are going to drive trucks in Canada if these people are jailed or messed with. Sympathy for this protest has spread to Europe. It's going to get worse before it gets better. An American convoy is being organized in California that starts tomorrow, the plan of which is to cross our country and go to DC. I think the power elite is scared right now.
 
I don't think there are many who are going to drive trucks in Canada if these people are jailed or messed with. Sympathy for this protest has spread to Europe. It's going to get worse before it gets better. An American convoy is being organized in California that starts tomorrow, the plan of which is to cross our country and go to DC. I think the power elite is scared right now.

It's an illegal blocking of the roads. If they want to protest, they should do it elsewhere.

Feel free to go join them.
 
There's a difference between their side of the border and ours. Protest is tolerated more here than in Canada.

Here's the thing - my question wasn't to you..and yet you continue to try and address the question....when it's obvious you don't know what he meant either.

Let him answer the question....I don't care about your speculation of what he meant.
 
“ *BREAKING* WINDSOR POLICE MOVE IN – Begin Removing Protesters Blocking Ambassador Bridge to US — Snipers on the Roof – City Buses Arrive for Arrests — Media Warned to Move Back”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ge-us-snipers-roof-city-buses-arrive-arrests/

Guns are legal in Canada, in case you didn't know that ( pretty sure you don't, you are a pretty fucking dumb Potato Boi).

Canada's citizens are the 10th most armed in the world, given the stupidity of some of these so called Truckers, I'd deploy snipers too.
 
It's an illegal blocking of the roads. If they want to protest, they should do it elsewhere.

Feel free to go join them.

I'm not going to join them. They are going to win this own. This protest is going to illustrate the fact that the governed is a bigger and more powerful force than the elected or unelected bureaucrats. People in huge numbers are withdrawing their consent to be governed in the way that they are.
 
Guns are legal in Canada, in case you didn't know that ( pretty sure you don't, you are a pretty fucking dumb Potato Boi).

Canada's citizens are the 10th most armed in the world, given the stupidity of some of these so called Truckers, I'd deploy snipers too.

So, you're in favor of shooting unarmed people presenting no violent threat? Of course you are.
 
Here's the thing - my question wasn't to you..and yet you continue to try and address the question....when it's obvious you don't know what he meant either.

Let him answer the question....I don't care about your speculation of what he meant.

You're going to have to suffer. That consideration has never stopped you from butting into any conversation being conducted.:rolleyes:
 
I'm not going to join them. They are going to win this own. This protest is going to illustrate the fact that the governed is a bigger and more powerful force than the elected or unelected bureaucrats. People in huge numbers are withdrawing their consent to be governed in the way that they are.

I'm glad that you support the illegal blockade of roads as a method of protests.
 
You're going to have to suffer. That consideration has never stopped you from butting into any conversation being conducted.:rolleyes:

When I have a direct response to your question, I do so. Your standard seems to just be to try to defend your buddy friend for no reason.

Here's the thing, he has no reasoning for his inference ..having guns wouldn't matter in this situation and more than likely, many already have them.

He tried and failed to use that angle. But thanks again for your opinion that never answered the question
 
Back
Top