My My, Senate Rule 26, Schumer's Next Hemorrhoid

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,009
Just think of the length and depth of the coming shit show when CNN, MSNBC, and ignorant Democrats get wind of this little gem:



This Senate Rule Could Stop Democrats From Confirming Biden’s SCOTUS Nominee
BY: RACHEL BOVARD
JANUARY 28, 2022

With the Senate split 50-50, the provision of Rule 26 that saved Lindsey Graham in 2020 could now doom a similar Democratic effort in 2022.


ith Justice Stephen Breyer officially announcing his retirement on Thursday (a full 24 hours after the White House announced it for him), Senate Democrats will have a chance to fill a Supreme Court seat, likely before the 2022 midterm elections in November.

But ever since 2017, when Senate Republicans invoked the nuclear option to confirm Supreme Court justices at a simple majority, instead of at the usual 60 votes necessary to break a filibuster, there has been procedurally little minorities can do to prevent a nomination from moving forward (the outright lies, smears, and chaos tactics Senate Democrats employed against Justice Brett Kavanaugh notwithstanding).

This conventional wisdom, however, is true only of Senates that present a clear minority-majority differential. The Senate of 2022 is tied, with 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans, which presents Republicans with an interesting procedural option: denying a quorum in the Senate Judiciary Committee, thus preventing the nomination from being reported out of committee and placed on the calendar, and ultimately moved to the Senate floor.

In parliamentary practice, a quorum is the number of members that must be present to hold votes and conduct official committee business. By failing to show up to vote on the nomination in committee, Republicans could prevent the nomination from reaching the Senate floor by appealing to the Senate’s Rule 26, which requires that a majority of members, physically present, report the bill out of committee. (The Senate’s Rule 14, which allows senators to bypass committee consideration for legislation, cannot be used for nominations.)

What has made this strategy ineffective in the past — namely, a Senate majority being able to present a numerical majority of their members in committee — is what makes it work in 2022, where the Senate’s committee membership, reflecting the makeup of the Senate, is in a tie.

More here:

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/2...ocrats-from-confirming-bidens-scotus-nominee/
 
(the outright lies, smears, and chaos tactics Senate Democrats employed against Justice Brett Kavanaugh notwithstanding).

There were no lies in that.

As for the quorum thing, I recall that when Texas Dem legislators fled the state to deny the Pubs a quorum and prevent a second post-census redistricting, the governor talked about sending state troopers to bring them back -- might actually have done it, I'm not sure.

And the FBI can find anybody, anywhere.
 
There were no lies in that.

As for the quorum thing, I recall that when Texas Dem legislators fled the state to deny the Pubs a quorum and prevent a second post-census redistricting, the governor talked about sending state troopers to bring them back -- might actually have done it, I'm not sure.

And the FBI can find anybody, anywhere.

So you're going to tell me that the premiere law enforcement agency in the world, that Trump refused to listen to regarding Russia, vetted Kavanaugh 6 times and missed these allegations? Ok Boomer.
 
So you're going to tell me that the premiere law enforcement agency in the world, that Trump refused to listen to regarding Russia, vetted Kavanaugh 6 times and missed these allegations? Ok Boomer.

No, I don't believe they were missed, only ignored.
 
But I'm sure they would only use such power if the nomination wasn't qualified...and not as just full obstruction.
 
No, I don't believe they were missed, only ignored.

Why? It makes no sense. These allegations were out there in 2005 when he was nominated to the DC Circuit. Let's not forget Dems. fought the nomination because they were he would end up on the Court.
 
There were no lies in that.

Bottom line, there was no proof.

As for the quorum thing, I recall that when Texas Dem legislators fled the state to deny the Pubs a quorum and prevent a second post-census redistricting, the governor talked about sending state troopers to bring them back -- might actually have done it, I'm not sure.

And the FBI can find anybody, anywhere.

Recall all you want. The Senate has its own rules particular to the Senate, not the legislature of Texas. Get ready.:D
 
Recall all you want. The Senate has its own rules particular to the Senate, not the legislature of Texas. Get ready.:D

If Harris can break the tie in the Senate, she can do the same in any committee. Bear in mind that she also gets to vote on changes to Senate rules.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top