Kamala Harris ‘struggling to define herself’ after two difficult resets

[SugarDaddy1]

Vice President Kamala Harris has reportedly struggled to define herself as vice president after failing to fulfill political promises in 2021.

After conducting two difficult political resets in two months, Harris is taking heat for failing to enact the destruction of election integrity measures, among other “difficult” initiatives assigned by President Biden, the Associated Press reported.

The AP’s story slams Harris for failing at the administration’s “most thankless tasks,” such as preventing the deadly Afghan withdrawal in September, blocking the ever-flowing stream of migrants across the southern border, federalizing local election laws in states across the nation, and conveying the White House’s communication positions.

Harris’s political rehabilitation*came*on the cusp of staff departures amid an “out of sync,” “poorly-managed,” and often “abusive environment” “shitshow” that reeks of an unhealthy environment, where people “often feel mistreated” like “shit.”

Source

 

[YDB95]

Breitbart strikes again. She could walk on water and their next headline would be "Harris Can't Swim".

 

[LittleDixie]

By all accounts, Kamala is a cunt.

Politico spoke to "22 current and former vice presidential aides, administration officials and associates of Harris" and President Joe Biden in a piece published Wednesday, one of whom told the outlet "it's an abusive environment" and "people often feel mistreated." Tina Flournoy, the vice president’s chief of staff, has "created an insular environment where ideas are ignored or met with harsh dismissals and decisions are dragged out," Politico’s sources said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-reportedly-an-abusive-environment/ar-AALGkkZ

 

[pecksniff]

Source

Haven't you learned by now never to post anything from Breitbart?

 

[Cubantripod]

Haven't you learned by now never to post anything from Breitbart?

So anything that isn't far left isn't credible. Got it.

 

[pecksniff]

So anything that isn't far left isn't credible. Got it.

I have studied American movement conservatism in considerable depth for many years. (See The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America, by Adrian Wooldridge and John Micklethwait; The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America, by Geoffrey Hodgson; Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America, by Nancy MacLean; etc.) Since 1964, a vast network has grown up of RW think-tanks, academic institutions and media outlets -- and not one bit of it has the slightest shred of credibility. Nothing that comes out of it ever holds up under the most cursory examination. This applies even to the National Review, which is much more serious and respectable than anything else on that side. As for Breitbart, RationalWiki, as usual, has the straight dope.

Breitbart.com is a far-right news site which operates out of the U.S., London and Jerusalem, and Conservapedia's main source of information nowadays. Well, we say news; it's more like the unwanted love child of Fox News and /pol/ who serves as an American Pravda for Donald Trump and others like him. "Screaming hateful absurdities" might be more appropriate. It was founded by Andrew Breitbart, whose death launched a bunch of idiot conspiracy theories among people who lost the ability to debate coherently a long time ago. Breitbart is basically a Nazi version of BuzzFeed.

It is inadvisable to use Breitbart as a source, where Wikipedia editors have agreed to not allow Breitbart to be used as citations for facts,[2] similar to how Daily Mail was blacklisted, though it does help when discussing how horrifying Stephen "Lenin" Bannon is.[3] It's called Breitbart because the name Bannon would be too telling: Steve is basically David Duke with a little more smarts, a Goldman guy with Seinfeld money who bought the outlet to push his agenda. There is no doubt that he will be successful — in destroying the Republican Party.

Amazing how a previously right-wing rag which was a notch below WorldNetDaily has become a major news outlet for "socially liberal" Reddit. Breitbart is building an army of unemployed twenty-somethings who will be the future of America. So no, they are not going away soon.