Should people be treated different simply because of the family they're born into?

Special By Birth?

  • Damned straight!!!

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • Fuck that shit!!!

    Votes: 5 83.3%

  • Total voters
    6

jaF0

Moderator
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Posts
39,168
I say fuck the Royals and the rich. Toss their spawn in with everyone else's.
 
Make some allowance for human nature. We are all born into families, and we all want our families raised above other families.
 
It won't be their end. The Royals and British Intel have a long history of covering for the pedros within their midst.

Prince Charles's uncle was a pedro,
and Prince Charles, in his naiivite, covered for Jimmy Saville and bishop Peter Ball


FBI files allege Lord Mountbatten, murdered by the IRA, was a pedophile

American intelligence officers began compiling the dossier in 1944, after Mountbatten was named supreme allied commander of southeast Asia. They were obtained via an FOI request by British historian Andrew Lownie.

(....) Anthony Daly worked as a rent boy for London's rich and famous during the 1970s. Daly claims that Mountbatten had something of a fetish for boys in uniforms.
(...) Mountbatten's friendship with Savile, sometimes linked to the investigation of Kincora Boys' Home in Ireland, a school that many believe housed a pedophilia ring for powerful British men. "

https://britishheritage.com/royals/lord-mountbatten-pedophile-allegations
 
Everyone should be treated the same. The problem is those who want to be treated special are often the ones with wealth and means to throw their weight around to keep their "special" status, even if it means keeping others down. They enjoy being above the rules and are willing to do anything to keep that position so that everyone would bow down to them only.




.....
 
Everyone should be treated equally and the same... however the left believes that they are all special snowflakes and should be treated as such, since rules, laws, and social norms shouldn't apply to them..
 
Meanwhile, Hollywood and social media influencers get all the clicks. Even from the OP.
 
As for Andrew, I'm thinking he's going to suffer an unfortunate fatal accident just like other Royals who failed to keep their dirty little secrets, secret.
 
As for Andrew, I'm thinking he's going to suffer an unfortunate fatal accident just like other Royals who failed to keep their dirty little secrets, secret.

Certainly that's not what happened to Princess Di. That whole bullshit theory has been dissected to death.

Maybe it's what happened to Mountbatten? Irish terrorists would make a good cover.
 
It won't be their end. The Royals and British Intel have a long history of covering for the pedros within their midst.

Prince Charles's uncle was a pedro,
and Prince Charles, in his naiivite, covered for Jimmy Saville and bishop Peter Ball


FBI files allege Lord Mountbatten, murdered by the IRA, was a pedophile

American intelligence officers began compiling the dossier in 1944, after Mountbatten was named supreme allied commander of southeast Asia. They were obtained via an FOI request by British historian Andrew Lownie.

(....) Anthony Daly worked as a rent boy for London's rich and famous during the 1970s. Daly claims that Mountbatten had something of a fetish for boys in uniforms.
(...) Mountbatten's friendship with Savile, sometimes linked to the investigation of Kincora Boys' Home in Ireland, a school that many believe housed a pedophilia ring for powerful British men. "

https://britishheritage.com/royals/lord-mountbatten-pedophile-allegations


That is a lie and a calumny of a war hero. It is alleged - of someone who was assasinated by the IRA. A dead man cannot defend himself. That is low - even for you. Saville was friendly with many people, most of whom had no idea of his other activities, only his charitable work.
 
That is a lie and a calumny of a war hero. It is alleged - of someone who was assasinated by the IRA. A dead man cannot defend himself. That is low - even for you.

"Norman Nield, Mountbatten’s driver from 1942 to 1943, alleged that he transported young boys aged eight to 12 who had been procured. Another man also claimed that Mountbatten and Anthony Blunt – surveyor of the Queen’s pictures and the “fourth man” in of the Cambridge spy ring – were part of a ring that engaged in orgies and procured boys at public schools."
https://www.heraldscotland.com/poli...ess-disturbing-life-charless-favourite-uncle/


"Lownie interviewed two men who were teenagers at the time of Mountbatten’s death.(who claimed were raped) One was from the notorious Kincora Boys’ Home, in Belfast, which has been at the centre of allegations of a paedophile ring involving well-connected men. The other claimed to have met Mountbatten four times that summer at Classiebawn.

Lownie suggests the IRA may have killed Mountbatten because of the allegations that he was a paedophile rather than because of his position in the Empire. “There were a lot of IRA people in that area. I am pretty sure they knew [the rumours].

Lownie says attempts to get to the heart of what happened with Mountbatten’s death have been thwarted by the failure of the UK National Archives to release its files about Kincora Boys’ Home. “There is so much in this story that has not been looked at.”

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/...of-lord-mountbatten-fact-or-fiction-1.4413622
 
People are treated differently based on who their parents are throughout their lives. It's not a question
 
It is still 'alleged;' without evidence and is blackening the name of a dead man who cannot respond. There is no way a dead man can clear his name from muck-raking journalists.

Take your alleged and bin it. The Scottish Herald is NOT a great source.
 
What is it with Brits and boys?!

Is it something to do with all males of the gentry class having attended boys' boarding schools? I recall reading that one alumnus of Eton or something similar remarked that when he was a student, homosexual activity would "attract less attention than going about with one's coat unbuttoned."

And if your sexual initiation were with a boy, boys might remain your preference even as an adult.
 
It is still 'alleged;' without evidence and is blackening the name of a dead man who cannot respond. There is no way a dead man can clear his name from muck-raking journalists.

Take your alleged and bin it. The Scottish Herald is NOT a great source.

Censoring the past: Andrew Lownie's fight to reveal Britain's darkest secrets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S86AgadDbv8
"We sit down with historian Andrew Lownie on his struggles to access documents he believes are being suppressed and, in some cases, destroyed by establishment figures to protect the reputation of royal figures like the Duke of Windsor and Lord Louis Mountbatten."


https://britishheritage.com/royals/lord-mountbatten-pedophile-allegations#
British Heritage Magazine
 
OK. How about this?

Many prominent Americans including senior politicians attended the Epstein/Maxwell parties far more often than Prince Andrew.

Why aren't they named and shamed? We know why. the American establishment protects its own but a foreign prince is fair game for all the things they did but won't admit.

PS. The British Secret Service has records of the misdoings of many Americans but has sealed them for 100 years after the individual's death to avoid embarrassing an ally. But the US? Any alleged crap will do.
 
Last edited:
The Proctor buys his pupil ices
And hopes the boy will not resist
Whilst he attempts to practice vices
Few people even know exist

-- Edward Gorey
 
calumny...

I'd not heard that word before. I'll have to work it into conversation.
 
calumny...

I'd not heard that word before. I'll have to work it into conversation.

Grammarly keeps telling me I use more unique words than 99% of its users.

Personally, I think it is counting my typos.
 
Last edited:
OK. How about this?

Many prominent Americans including senior politicians attended the Epstein/Maxwell parties far more often than Prince Andrew.

Why aren't they named and shamed?

They are, a lot, on this board.
 
Back
Top