unpublished drawing

[footsy]

I have been trying since before November to get this drawing posted, was told that they didn't post non consent subjects so I changed the story related to the picture to a wife's fantasy to be tied up. I am still waiting for it to be posted since Nov 6th

 

[Ashfordbloke]

Nicely done! As a frequent user of ropes and gags, you have captured the look of uncertainty on her face perfectly! The last time I saw that look she was about to be penetrated...

 

[footsy]

thank you for your comment I was trying to convey the helplessness of her situation

 

[Earthlyone]

They seem to have allocated a particularly day about once a month to visit the illustration submissions and publish them.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - this site has become a monster over the years, so if those that own/run it can't handle it they should either hire more people or shrink the site down to something more manageable for them.

 

[Magineer]

Really good to see some worthy line drawing again, instead of the usual CG no-talent "art".

You've absolutely captured that helpless "what now?" moment. Would love to read the original n/c story.

 

[footsy]

you're mine now.

they rejected my story

 

[Magineer]

Yes, I get that... but do you still have the original, unaltered story in your possession? If so, you could at least share it with others privately.

 

[footsy]

story

no I deleted the story I'm sorry to say

 

[Magineer]

That's a shame. Yet another case of someone bullied by Lit. into bowdlerising their output.

 

[RoperTrace]

I have been trying since before November to get this drawing posted, was told that they didn't post non consent subjects so I changed the story related to the picture to a wife's fantasy to be tied up. I am still waiting for it to be posted since Nov 6th

. .

 

[footsy]

you're mine now

thank you glad you liked it

 

[KeithD]

I have been trying since before November to get this drawing posted, was told that they didn't post non consent subjects so I changed the story related to the picture to a wife's fantasy to be tied up. I am still waiting for it to be posted since Nov 6th

Congrats or something. You've now circumvented Literotica's right to determine what gets posted to Literotica. Posting it to the discussion board is just as published as submitting it to Literotica to honor their right of what gets published to Literotica.

 

[footsy]

I know they have to be careful because there are subjects that nobody wants to see or read, but to say that my drawing was not allowed because they did not publish anything that was non consent is stupid when you have a section for non consent in the stories, plus my drawing is not explicit, welcome to North Korea

 

[THROBBS]

I have been trying since before November to get this drawing posted, was told that they didn't post non consent subjects so I changed the story related to the picture to a wife's fantasy to be tied up. I am still waiting for it to be posted since Nov 6th

Did you try and submit as an illustrated story or as a stand alone image?

There tends to be more leniency for illustrations than stories and especially photos.

For illustrations there is space for description and depending on that content you image might be flagged.
There has been a LONG lag time for illustration submissions, though I have not tried in many months.






Also, this forum is not policed very heavily/frequently, so if there is a LIT-rules issue it may take a while to be noticed.

Regardless, it's a free site and their rules. I have found that it allows my kinks, vs "deviant art", which is not "deviant" at all.

Still a long way from North Korea.

 

[footsy]

yes I did post the drawing as an individual drawing, not part of the story a separate item but was influenced by the story, so when it was first declined because I had added a short story about a girl going out and being kidnapped by a pervert, I changed the story to it being a wife who's fantasy was to be tied up and helpless, I reposted it on 10th April 2021 and it is still pending

 

[THROBBS]

yes I did post the drawing as an individual drawing, not part of the story a separate item but was influenced by the story, so when it was first declined because I had added a short story about a girl going out and being kidnapped by a pervert, I changed the story to it being a wife who's fantasy was to be tied up and helpless, I reposted it on 10th April 2021 and it is still pending

hmmm...
I suppose you could resubmit, again.
Or throw in the towel on that one.


Some further info on stories:

Was there excessive violence, snuff, or abuse of characters in your story?

Your story was too extreme for our guidelines. These judgments are subjective, and thus we can't give an exact definition of what exactly is "too much". Certain "violence" in a BDSM situation between consenting adults may be allowed, while the same "violence" between strangers in a non-consentual situation will not. Tone and respect for characters, as well as the "violent" scene within the context of the story, are what we make our judgments upon. If your story is rejected for this, feel free to send the story back with a polite request for an explanation and we will tell you why it was rejected. If you disagree with our assessment, you are more than welcome to publish your story elsewhere rather than alter it to our guidelines. We respect your rights as authors to write on whatever you like, however you like.

Added by Laurel for clarification: While we do accept submissions with graphic violence, we don't accept "snuff" - i.e. death & extreme torture with the aim of sexual titillation. We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused.

 

[SimonDoom]

I like the drawing. I think it's well done.

It seems to me it falls within the guidelines for permissible content at Literotica. It shows a woman tied up: so what? Literotica allows. I don't see signs of injury or excessive pain or fear, just the usual of what would go along with nonconsent.

It's a free site and they have the ultimate say, but this strikes me as a bad exercise of discretion.

As I said, I thought it was well done. To the OP, sorry you've had so much difficulty getting your content posted. The permissible content guidelines concerning nonconsent material can be confusing, so it's understandable that you would be frustrated.

 

[Enthrallyaa]

Lit has a "Reluctance/non consent" section and yet when you post anything relating to that it isn't allowed. I had to adjust a story because because one of my characters was doing something against their will!

Makes sense...not!

 

[HeyAll]

IMO make other pictures that show the woman consenting to being tied up and going along with that. Indicate that in the writing. Then the picture is no longer noncon.

 

[ElectricBlue]

yes I did post the drawing as an individual drawing, not part of the story a separate item but was influenced by the story, so when it was first declined because I had added a short story about a girl going out and being kidnapped by a pervert, I changed the story to it being a wife who's fantasy was to be tied up and helpless, I reposted it on 10th April 2021 and it is still pending

It's unclear to me what is actually going on now. You have said the drawing was submitted by itself, yet you then refer to two different stories.

So it's no longer clear what's getting rejected. I suspect the stories - the drawing itself (which we've seen in this thread through a link) appears harmless enough.

My suggestion, if you do want to get this illustration posted with a story, is to start again with a new submission, a story that will be acceptable, and the illustration.

Ranting and bitching about the site is not helpful, because Laurel might well drop by and see this thread and be in a bad mood and think, you know what, fuck it.

Start again, be polite; that might work. It's worth a try.

It's a good drawing - but it seems to me it's the words that are the problem now, not the drawing (this is now more about content, less about context).

 

[footsy]

I have posted this as a separate drawing, when I said story I meant the synopsis for the drawing and the last synopsis was that the housewife always wanted to be tied up and helpless and her husband gave her the fantasy. but I have another drawing pending of a wife at a glory hole and that one hasn't been posted maybe I should give up and try somewhere else

 

[THROBBS]

I have posted this as a separate drawing, when I said story I meant the synopsis for the drawing and the last synopsis was that the housewife always wanted to be tied up and helpless and her husband gave her the fantasy. but I have another drawing pending of a wife at a glory hole and that one hasn't been posted maybe I should give up and try somewhere else

Well check back in, if/when it does get published.
And check back in if you find a better place to post.

 

[Magineer]

Well, let's be honest... that's exactly what's needed here, isn't it really? Lit. is in sore need of a bit of meaningful competition. It's stale to the nth. and that's putting it euphemistically.

The site is supposed to be on-turning or at least mildly stimulating. I suspect most people come away from viewing the unrelenting same-old, same-old here, yawning...

 

[THROBBS]

Well, let's be honest... that's exactly what's needed here, isn't it really? Lit. is in sore need of a bit of meaningful competition. It's stale to the nth. and that's putting it euphemistically.

The site is supposed to be on-turning or at least mildly stimulating. I suspect most people come away from viewing the unrelenting same-old, same-old here, yawning...

"meaningful competition"?

You have suggestions?

I have suggested to manu some thoughts on the "up front" visual arts area.
There could be some sort of vetting, as with the written material. — minimal standards. much like spelling, grammar.

It seems that the visual area(s) are of low priority (it is LITerotica after all).

There is, of course the time/effort involved with that. I really doubt that there would be many (any?) volunteers to become visual "editors". Frankly, I don't see many who would be qualified.

*shrug*

 

[Earthlyone]

It's surprisingly difficult to find places on the internet to showcase your own original adult art these days. Xhamster and XNXX for instance require verification in the form of a face photo with you holding up a piece of paper with your username written on it. They can fuck right off with that.