Donny (and Spawn) Subpeonaed

Since this presumably relates to things that happened before Trump was president, there would be no conceivable argument for the application of executive privilege -- would there?
 
How Tish James shamelessly milked the public

Public Advocate Letitia James didn’t just take $750,000 in public money that she didn’t need for her campaign this year: She spent $500,000 of it on Election Day itself — dumping money she’d otherwise have been obliged to return.

The public has an outside chance of clawing back some of James’ windfall: The CFB does post-election audits of campaign spending, and it will certainly give a close look at her last-day outlays. But if she dumped the funds on “legitimate” consultant-cronies, the board may be unable to do a thing.

In any case, it’s plain that James was happy to ding the public for every dime she legally could — which is a pretty remarkable approach for the city’s public advocate.
Source
 
Since this presumably relates to things that happened before Trump was president, there would be no conceivable argument for the application of executive privilege -- would there?


There's never been executive privilege for the relatives of sitting presidents, let alone former presidents.
 
Since this presumably relates to things that happened before Trump was president, there would be no conceivable argument for the application of executive privilege -- would there?

There is no issue with executive privilege here, this is the state of NY vs Trump estate.
 
Back
Top