Could the decolonization of Africa been handled better?

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
The problem with Africa is that they're trying to build modern nation-states out of populations whose first loyalties are to family, clan and tribe. Historical circumstances have forced them to skip over the very long process by which national consciousness developed in the local cultures of Europe.

Another problem is that these nation-states follow colonial boundaries drawn up in Europe in the 19th Century, without much regard to any local sense of ethnicity or nationality -- every national border represents a line at which, e.g., Britain and France agreed to recognize each other's claims to territory with that country's troops and settlers in it.

Is there any way the process could have been done to avoid the regrettable history of civil wars, dictatorships, etc., that has afflicted the African countries since independence?
 
Last edited:
It is, of course, possible to imagine an AH in which Africa was never colonized to such an extent -- the Euros simply established colony-towns on the coasts and traded with the interior. Then it would all be native kingdoms, now.
 
China is in the process of colonising Africa at the moment. No good will come of it.
 
They're not taking over control of territory like the Euros did, nor sending in any troops -- they're just investing.

That's how European nations started in Africa, then troops followed to protect their investments...
 
Power corrupts. If it can happen to the Republican Party here....why would anyone expect anything different in Africa? Could of it been done better? Sure. But I have zero confidence in humans to walk a higher road when given the choice.
 
Back
Top