Friggin' Lawless Democrats Never Learn

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,302
Hopefully next year we can put an end to this lawless behavior.


US Court Rejects Bid to End Trump-Era 'Remain in Mexico' Border Policy

Tuesday, 14 December 2021 06:50 AM

A U.S. appeals court on Monday rejected a renewed attempt by the Biden administration to end a policy put in place by former President Donald Trump that forced tens of thousands of migrants to wait in Mexico for the resolution of their U.S. asylum cases.

President Joe Biden, a Democrat, scrapped his Republican predecessor's policy - often referred to as "Remain in Mexico" - soon after taking office in January this year. But after Texas and Missouri sued over the rescission, a federal judge ruled it had to be reinstated.

Under the 2019 policy, officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), migrants seeking asylum must wait weeks and sometimes years in Mexico for a U.S. court date instead of being allowed to await their hearings in the United States. Biden decried the policy on the campaign trail and immigration advocates have said migrants stuck in dangerous border cities have faced kidnappings and other dangers.

The Biden administration re-issued a memo terminating MPP in the hopes it would overcome the legal challenges. But the conservative-leaning 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was not convinced by the new memo.

In a Monday night ruling, the court said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "claims the power to implement a massive policy reversal — affecting billions of dollars and countless people — simply by typing out a new Word document and posting it on the internet. No input from Congress, no ordinary rulemaking procedures, and no judicial review."

More here:

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/court-rejects-border-policy/2021/12/14/id/1048546/
 
Maybe somebody will smack Biden in the face with a wet mop and read him the law.
 
Any policy put in place by an administration, by executive order, without involving Congress, can of course be reversed in the same way.
 
Any policy put in place by an administration, by executive order, without involving Congress, can of course be reversed in the same way.

Not if the congressional remedy violates the separation of powers, or in other words infringes upon the plenary powers of the Executive.
 
The court’s opinion was written with Adobe InCopy. The battle is on!
 
Change of policy != illegal

Didn't Biden reinstitute this policy about a week ago, which made nation news? I'm not sure what the OP Turd for brains is taking about except the same old whining about Dems. since they are responsible for everything wrong including his hemroids.
 
Trumpies wants to courts to convict his opposition but then celebrates when they do and bitches when they don't

Anything less is lawlessness, even though the courts decide what that actually means
 
The idea that a new presidential administration must follow the policies of a previous administration seems brand new in American history. Of course, the Fifth Circuit is basically Fox and Friends with black robes.
 
The idea that a new presidential administration must follow the policies of a previous administration seems brand new in American history. Of course, the Fifth Circuit is basically Fox and Friends with black robes.

There two issues at play here. First is the Administrative Procedures Act. This was changed very quickly after Biden took over. His administration did not comply with the APA.

Second, just like with DACA, when Congress has been silent, an executive order can have the effect of law unless Congress acts. It's why Trump couldn't reverse DACA. Same doctrine being applied here.
 
Didn't Biden reinstitute this policy about a week ago, which made nation news?

What I thought, too

I'm not sure what the OP Turd for brains is taking about except the same old whining about Dems. since they are responsible for everything wrong including his hemroids.

He’s got his own reality going.
 
If he can impose a "remain in Mexico" policy without Congress, then the next president can reverse that without Congress.

The difference here is the remain in Mexico policy order was made in compliance with US statutory law, hence the court order to put it back in place. It was Biden who was breaking the law.

Isn't it about time for you to throw a TV dinner in the microwave or something?:D
 
The difference here is the remain in Mexico policy order was made in compliance with US statutory law, hence the court order to put it back in place. It was Biden who was breaking the law.

Isn't it about time for you to throw a TV dinner in the microwave or something?:D

The only difference is that you don't like Biden.
 
BTW, how does the Mexican government feel about this "remain in Mexico" policy?

And, yes, that does matter.
 
BTW, how does the Mexican government feel about this "remain in Mexico" policy?

And, yes, that does matter.
If you recall it was negotiated between the US and the Mexican government during the Trump administration. Biden in his mad rush to eliminate all things Trump committed an act of aggression against his own people in his hurry to do so. The court, rightfully enforced the law.
 
If you recall it was negotiated between the US and the Mexican government during the Trump administration. Biden in his mad rush to eliminate all things Trump committed an act of aggression against his own people in his hurry to do so. The court, rightfully enforced the law.

That is incredibly stupid even for you.
 
Back
Top