Hillary's Masterclass On Delusion
- Thread starter Rightguide
- Start date
That reflects badly on half the country, not on Hillary.
Cubantripod
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Posts
- 2,727
No, it reflect negatively on you all, who can't see how poor a candidate she was. She was probably the only candidate the Trump could beat.
She got the nomination because she had everything in place, all the corporate donors and backers who found her more respectable and less threatening than Sanders or whoever -- what that reflects badly on is the way both parties run primaries and elections.
I agree, Sanders could have beaten Trump -- early in 2016, many voters were wavering on which of the two they preferred -- because both had an anti-establishment image. The difference was, in Sanders' case it was for real.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,931
Only in your limited mental capacity.
I'm a lot smarter than you, dude.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,931
Yep, living large in board Trumpette's heads.She's still servicing a valuable purpose.
If she's servicing anything it's probably Huma.
BluesDriver66
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2020
- Posts
- 1,536
Oh fuck that greedy corporate toady Hillary Clinton and the broom she rode in on.
In lucrative paid speeches that Hillary Clinton delivered to elite financial firms but refused to disclose to the public, she displayed an easy comfort with titans of business, embraced unfettered international trade and praised a budget-balancing plan that would have required cuts to Social Security, according to documents posted online Friday by WikiLeaks.
... she mused on the necessity of having “both a public and a private position” on politically contentious issues.
And she praised a deficit-reduction proposal from President Obama’s fiscal commission that called for raising the Social Security retirement age, saying that the commission’s leaders “had put forth the right framework.”
The Clintons have made more than $120 million in speeches to Wall Street and special interests since Bill Clinton left the White House in 2001. Mrs. Clinton typically earned $225,000 for speeches, though she sometimes donated her fees to her family foundation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/hillary-clinton-speeches-wikileaks.html
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,931
I seriously doubt that. You haven't won an argument since I've been here.
Pretty much all of them. You're the one who's too stupid to get that.
See post #30.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,931
All you do is deny and lie. Like with the Russian collusion BS.
If she's servicing anything it's probably Huma.
Ranks right up there with Michelle-is-a-male-gorilla.
KeithD
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Posts
- 29,626
She also listed as the most admired woman in the country for years and years. So, go figure.
She also got the most votes--by millions--in the 2016 presidential election.
She also listed as the most admired woman in the country for years and years. So, go figure.
I believe the same was true of Nixon in his day -- the most loved and the most hated person in America, polls showed.
That sort of thing reflects more on the state of society than the character of the subject.
Always won that one, too. All the lies were yours.
KeithD
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Posts
- 29,626
Yep, all of the lies on the Trump Russian collusion belong to the board Trumpettes.
ShyBiGuy954
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Posts
- 2,529
LupusDei
curious alien
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Posts
- 4,284
Her mistake was taking the domestic win for granted. With a dream opponent and all. Where her true ambition was, was the international arena, and she would be a superstar there, building on the solid groundwork Obama laid.
It would have been interesting how the "big lie," the allegedly stolen election narrative that was already been prepared for Trump would have played out against her, together with the endless obstructionism (remember, Republicans got both houses). Her loss surprised everyone and broke that game. Trump shouldn't have won, his job was to ensure red waves in 2018 and 2020. He blundered that, and made US the world's laughing stock. Until the true horror of whom he represents was realized.
It would have been interesting how the "big lie," the allegedly stolen election narrative that was already been prepared for Trump would have played out against her, together with the endless obstructionism (remember, Republicans got both houses). Her loss surprised everyone and broke that game. Trump shouldn't have won, his job was to ensure red waves in 2018 and 2020. He blundered that, and made US the world's laughing stock. Until the true horror of whom he represents was realized.
Indeed. The whole campaign was guilty of a fatal complacency, overlooking key swing states as sure wins.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,931
Who claimed that?
A great many of your worthless kind. More of a meme than a serious assertion, perhaps, but so is the bit about lesbian goings-on between Hillary and Huma.
KeithD
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Posts
- 29,626
If you search back on the discussion board, you'll find that. Since you won't accept it when it's waved under your nose, there's no reason to go to the effort to play your deflection game.
Similar threads
