Jan. 6 Commission Caught Fabricating Evidence

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,690
Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats are liars and conspirators. They need to be held accountable:


REVEALED: Jan 6 Commission FABRICATED Whereabouts of Willard Hotel ‘War Room’ Attendee in Subpoena, Evidence Shows.
Evidence has revealed the January 6th Commission is lying in its subpoenas to leading right-wing figures.


by Raheem J. Kassam
November 23, 2021

Tollbooth records belonging to former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik place him 300 miles away from the infamous January 5th meeting at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., with a legal letter (below) seen by The National Pulse accusing Rep. Bernie Thompson’s commission of fabricating the evidence. Thompson’s Jan. 6th commission recently subpoenaed Kerik, a close associate of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Their letter asserted:

The Select Committee’s investigation and public accounts have revealed credible evidence of your involvement in the events within the scope of the Select Committee’s inquiry. You reportedly participated in a meeting on January 5, 2021 at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C., in which Rudolph Giuliani, Stephen Bannon, John Eastman, and others discussed options for overturning the results of the November 2020 election such as, among other things, pressuring Vice President Pence not to certify the electoral college results…

Kerik’s lawyers at the Parlatore Law Group struck back Tuesday, however, insisting:

We knew from the time that we received the subpoena that this was a false allegation, as Mr. Kerik never participated in any such meeting. He wasn’t even in Washington DC, as he was in New York dealing with a family medical emergency. While we knew at the time that the claim was false, we later found out that it was actually a fabrication.

This passage in your letter had a footnote, citing two sources for this allegation, Bob Woodward’s book, Peril, as well as a Washington Post article. However, a review of both cites quickly demonstrates that no such allegation was ever made. The Washington Post article does discuss Mr. Kerik’s involvement in investigating fraud, but makes no mention of this alleged meeting, whereas Woodward’s book does not claim that Mr. Kerik was at the meeting. In fact, a text search of Woodward’s book reveals that the word “Kerik” isn’t even mentioned once.

Members of the January 6th commission claimed to have “credible evidence” proving that Kerik was at the Willard Hotel in Washington on January 5th. In fact, no such evidence exists, further underlining the farcical nature of the commission and its fishing exercise against leading right-wing figures.

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/r...war-room-attendee-in-subpoena-evidence-shows/
 
Searched and nobody.is reporting this.

Conclusion...the National Pulse and the OP are full of it.


Next!
 

At issue for Kerik is the committee’s assertion that he attended a Jan. 5 meeting at the hotel where participants reportedly discussed different strategies for overturning the election results.

At the meeting was longtime friend Rudy Giuliani as well as John Eastman, who crafted a memo outlining former President Trump's options for alleged pathways to contest the election.

But Kerik never attended the meeting in Washington, his attorney wrote the panel in a letter first reported by Politico and obtained by The Hill, because he was in New York dealing with a family emergency.

“For these reasons, Mr. Kerik demands that both the letter and press release be withdrawn or corrected and an apology issued. Whether intentional or negligent, allowing these false statements to stand on the website of this committee is improper and should be corrected,” Timothy Parlatore, Kerik’s attorney, wrote Tuesday.

Not exactly "fabricating evidence."
 
Never even heard of that as a thing before.

Let me decipher this for you....they are giving depositions after being given a supena to testify...those depositions are not to the liking of Republicans so they call it "lying".
 
Searched and nobody.is reporting this.

Conclusion...the National Pulse and the OP are full of it.


Next!

That's because you're condemned to CNN and MSLSD. This is why you're intellectually stunted and out of touch with reality. Do you think they are going to report facts that completely undermine their past lies and fabrications? There are hundreds of reliable news sources on the Internet. many run by former reporters for the big time news organizations sick of their politicized wokeness and bias. Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters are well known conservative investigative reporters. Try and prove their facts wrong, I dare you.
 
That's because you're condemned to CNN and MSLSD. This is why you're intellectually stunted and out of touch with reality. Do you think they are going to report facts that completely undermine their past lies and fabrications? There are hundreds of reliable news sources on the Internet. many run by former reporters for the big time news organizations sick of their politicized wokeness and bias. Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters are well known conservative investigative reporters. Try and prove their facts wrong, I dare you.

I read a wide variety of sources including some conservative source.

The National Pulse is not a reputable source.
They engage in poor fact checking and publish conspiracy theory pieces not based in facts much like the National Enquirer.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-national-pulse/
 
Bernard Kerik is a known liar, convicted of criminal falsehoods among other things in 2009. Why believe him now?
 
I read a wide variety of sources including some conservative source.

The National Pulse is not a reputable source.
They engage in poor fact checking and publish conspiracy theory pieces not based in facts much like the National Enquirer.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-national-pulse/

So instead of proving the facts wrong you attack the site with a phony reference to a known far left propaganda confirmation site posing as fact checking honest brokers. Which goes to your own laziness and lack of intellectual rigor.
 
The whole thing has been proven to be a complete fabrication, as I told you it was four years ago.

No, it hasn't. The Trump campaign was in communication with the Russians, who did interfere in the election on Trump's side. The only open question is how much Trump knew about it at the time.
 
No, it hasn't. The Trump campaign was in communication with the Russians, who did interfere in the election on Trump's side. The only open question is how much Trump knew about it at the time.

The whole thing was a fabrication made up by Hillary Clinton, as Durham's investigation will show. There was no collusion between Trump and the Russians. The collusion was between the Clinton Campaign and the Russians to draw attention away from here misuse of classified information and to frame Trump. Those are the facts. You were inexcusably duped for years and you lacked the intellectual rigor to sort it out. You were a patsy, one of many.
 
So instead of proving the facts wrong you attack the site with a phony reference to a known far left propaganda confirmation site posing as fact checking honest brokers. Which goes to your own laziness and lack of intellectual rigor.

May I remind you....there are no right leaning fact check organizations because they don't use facts and fabric narratives so they have no need to fact check.

The source I used fact checks both left and right and middle ground sources evenly.
 
So instead of proving the facts wrong you attack the site with a phony reference to a known far left propaganda confirmation site posing as fact checking honest brokers. Which goes to your own laziness and lack of intellectual rigor.

Why try to prove their assertions, not facts, wrong? The national pulse pegs the the needle on extreme right bullshit. And you know it. Trolls gonna troll. :D
 
Back
Top