Good News for Kyle Rittenhouse

[WillJ8787]

Stop with the bullshit. Those people were rioting, looting, and burning. They weren't "peacefully protesting" which is all the First Amendment allows. They were armed and there to commit crimes in the chaos they were there to create. Citizens have every right to arm themselves against widespread lawlessness and violence these people assembled there to perpetrate.

A fundamental premise of juris prudence is impassionate persuit of The law....and for good reason! Can you cite the ways in which that is important and why you are not pursuing an impassionate view of the matter?

My personal feelings(your too) and my personal opinion and beliefs(your too) play no role in this case. It does not matter what you think.you know and the same goes for me. That is a fair system.
Wouldn't you agree?

 

[CornusKousa]

Yes we know rioting is illegal, though we have to accept that a certain amount of it is going to happen and will always happen and always has happened. That's just how life works.

No, you WANT us to accept it, because you support it when your side does it.

We don't actually have to, in real life if you come at someone you are wrong and if you get put down for it, that was on you.

If you are not law enforcement you going armed to the site of what you even believe is a crime is called vigilante which is just as if not more illegal.

No, that's not vigilantism and no you don't have to be a cop to defend yourself either. Google is your friend.

He had zero business being there and yes I am mad that we are debating if shooting people for shit that didn't involve you is an actual thing. Its bad enough that we don't prosecute police very often for clearly overreacting to a situation but a civilian getting away with it? Fuck that and anybody who supports this individual.

It did involve him though and the right to self defense is not regulated to the time and place of leftist rage mob and their terrorist supporters liking.

It isn't self defense if I didn't have a reason to be there in the first place. Sorry, this isn't grade school and the "I'm not touching you" defense shouldn't hold.

Yes it is.

Location is irrelevant, you come at someone and they fuck you up, or kill you, they are justified.

They don't need a reason or permission from any control freak assholes to be anywhere in this country and still have the right to defend themselves.

Again, self defense is not restricted to places of lefty terrorist choosing.

 

[WillJ8787]

Why not?

Why is it not the rioters who had no place rioting there??



Play stupid games win stupid prizes buddy...... you want to go burn peoples lives down and beat up some white folks for being white? You might get shot for doing some shit like that, this is the USA and self defense is a thing here.



Depends on what you think "helping the situation" is.

We had a few spots that were rallied to protect veterans..... rioters were wise enough to leave the places swarming with heavily armed iraq/afghanistan vets waving their dicks at them... the fuck alone. It was a lot fun actually

Rioters and looters have no business in the middle of protests for human rights.

Half assed traitors playing army have no business in the middle of protests for human rights. They are liable to get hurt or jailed as we have seen over and over again. I visit your mother when your in jail.

 

[CornusKousa]

Rioters and looters have no business in the middle of protests for human rights.

Half assed traitors playing army have no business in the middle of protests for human rights. They are liable to get hurt or jailed as we have seen over and over again.

Protest for human rights... LMFAO!!!

You think mass looting and destruction was protesting for human rights???

https://c.tenor.com/bN0hO7r_M40AAAAM/laughing-laughing-hysterically.gif

There was no protest for human rights, just generic lawlessness.

And considering the fire power, aggression and combat skill disparity between my squad of combat vets and the rioters?? I don't think it was us who was going to get hurt too bad.

I visit your mother when your in jail.

LOL... still not smart enough to figure out your and you're hua??

And my mom's dead, good luck with that.

 

[bellisarius]

Rittenhouse was there to help protect property from looters and arsonists. That is precisely the place you should be armed.

As far as the protestors go, as soon as the looting and arson began they should have collected their shit and left the scene. Those that didn't have become accessories after the fact and are no different than, and are virtually indistinguishable from, the looters and arsonists. And that is exactly why the judge has ruled as he did.

 

[Rightguide]

A fundamental premise of juris prudence is impassionate persuit of The law....and for good reason! Can you cite the ways in which that is important and why you are not pursuing an impassionate view of the matter?

My personal feelings(your too) and my personal opinion and beliefs(your too) play no role in this case. It does not matter what you think.you know and the same goes for me. That is a fair system.
Wouldn't you agree?

I saw the video of the shooting. I saw him being chased down the street. I saw the evidence.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I saw the video of the shooting. I saw him being chased down the street. I saw the evidence.

He had no business being there. He wasn't protecting HIS property.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, you WANT us to accept it, because you support it when your side does it.

We don't actually have to, in real life if you come at someone you are wrong and if you get put down for it, that was on you.

No, we have to accept it for the same reason we accept that about twelve thousand people are murdered by guns in the US every year. That's not counting suicides, accidental deaths, justifiable deaths that wouldn't be justified if you could be reasonably sure people weren't armed.

The same reason we have to accept that as long as both cars and liquor exist there will be DUIs and some people will die.

This is reality. Shit happens and you can either put in place an increasing number of restrictions (And even then you are NEVER going to end 100% of something) or get the numbers down to an acceptable number and ignore it. We are so far beneath the acceptable numbers that I don't even know why people are discussing it.

Yeah, and if you PUT yourself in a hostile environment and someone takes you out that's on you as well.

No, that's not vigilantism and no you don't have to be a cop to defend yourself either. Google is your friend.

That's the thing, he had no reason to be there. That's vigilantism, going to a place planning to enfoce the law which by his own admission he was there to defend property which is not his job. Google IS my friend.

It did involve him though and the right to self defense is not regulated to the time and place of leftist rage mob and their terrorist supporters liking.

Yes it is.

Location is irrelevant, you come at someone and they fuck you up, or kill you, they are justified.

They don't need a reason or permission from any control freak assholes to be anywhere in this country and still have the right to defend themselves.

Again, self defense is not restricted to places of lefty terrorist choosing.

Its not self defense when you put yourself in a situation you had no business being in. I know you never matured past the twelve year old mentality that you can provoke someone and when you get a reaction pretend you're justified but that's the mentality of a twelve year old.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

True, but you can bet Cawthorn's fan club has contributed plenty to his legal bills.

True! I donated $500 myself.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

From I'll I've read about this case, Rittenhouse is the one who came armed. The dead guys didn't. Where does self-defense enter into it?

The last guy, who got his arm shot off, was armed.

Rittenhouse didn't shoot first.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Gotta love racist...white guy goes out to "protect" sneakers, starts shooting folks because he is both a racist and not trained....and, my oh my...he must be innocent.

This Won't go as the racist think it will.

White guy shoots three white guys.

Clearly a racist.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Shot at him? Cite?

From the videos I saw the rioters/looters/arsonists were harassing KR some in a non-life threatening manner.

As Rittenhouse was fleeing from his assailant, someone else behind the assailant took at shot at Rittenhouse.

 

[WillJ8787]

Protest for human rights... LMFAO!!!

You think mass looting and destruction was protesting for human rights???

https://c.tenor.com/bN0hO7r_M40AAAAM/laughing-laughing-hysterically.gif

There was no protest for human rights, just generic lawlessness.

And considering the fire power, aggression and combat skill disparity between my squad of combat vets and the rioters?? I don't think it was us who was going to get hurt too bad.



LOL... still not smart enough to figure out your and you're hua??

And my mom's dead, good luck with that.

I have a shovel...digging down 6ft...no problem.
Gotta love a lunatic and frothing at the mouth racist, which is what you are and probably will always be.

At least your not stupid enough to kill anyone like Mr. Rittenhouse...or was it something else that held you back?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Never....What's it matter? That's not how self defense works.

I can just see it now:

"Sarge, help me! You're my husband and this man is raping me!!"

"I'm sorry, sweetheart, but has he been convicted of that? I don't think so."

 

[Rightguide]

He had no business being there. He wasn't protecting HIS property.

He had as much right to be there as the criminals who were shot. Every citizen has the right to stop a felony in progress, or the design of a felony.

 

[WillJ8787]

Rittenhouse was there to help protect property from looters and arsonists. That is precisely the place you should be armed.

As far as the protestors go, as soon as the looting and arson began they should have collected their shit and left the scene. Those that didn't have become accessories after the fact and are no different than, and are virtually indistinguishable from, the looters and arsonists. And that is exactly why the judge has ruled as he did.

It a shame you are a racist as well...oh, well, we have lots of you in this backward country, made more so by folks that think like you.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

He had no business being there. He wasn't protecting HIS property.

Entirely unimportant.

 

[WillJ8787]

He had as much right to be there as the criminals who were shot. Every citizen has the right to stop a felony in progress, or the design of a felony.

....and to go right to jail for it. The best you could do is stand on the sidelines, pissing in your pants like Corncobb did...too chicken shit to step up.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

....and to go right to jail for it. The best you could do is stand on the sidelines, pissing in your pants like Corncobb did...too chicken shit to step up.

Self-defense is a perfect defense against a charge of murder or manslaughter. Rittenhouse was defending himself, demonstrably.

 

[WillJ8787]

Self-defense is a perfect defense against a charge of murder or manslaughter. Rittenhouse was defending himself, demonstrably.

Sure, I've meet more than a few racists who claim self defense as legitimate reason for killing folks. I had one of you like not long ago say, "you just pull them(she meant black people) into your house and then shoot. Stand your ground and self defense..

I know what you racists are all about.

 

[Rightguide]

....and to go right to jail for it. The best you could do is stand on the sidelines, pissing in your pants like Corncobb did...too chicken shit to step up.

Please pussy out somewhere else. You're an embarrassment to American manhood...wait have we even established your gender?

 

[Rightguide]

Sure, I've meet more than a few racists who claim self defense as legitimate reason for killing folks. I had one of you like not long ago say, "you just pull them(she meant black people) into your house and then shoot. Stand your ground and self defense..

I know what you racists are all about.

Fairy Tales.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Sure, I've meet more than a few racists who claim self defense as legitimate reason for killing folks. I had one of you like not long ago say, "you just pull them(she meant black people) into your house and then shoot. Stand your ground and self defense..

I know what you racists are all about.

I think you could have worked one or two more "racists" into that belch of kultursmog.

Are you disputing self-defense should be an affirmative defense against a charge of murder?

 

[WillJ8787]

He had as much right to be there as the criminals who were shot. Every citizen has the right to stop a felony in progress, or the design of a felony.

He had a right to be pet of the protest or against it.

He didn't have the right to make any sort of arrest....and hence, why folks got shot and he is heading to trial and most likely jail.

He is no hero...just a fool with a racist bent towards protesting folks who are of a different color...and a pawn in this terrible propaganda coming from the right that encourages violence with guns.

 

[Sean Renaud]

White guy shoots three white guys.

Clearly a racist.

White guy shoots three white guys at a problack meeting so yes, still clearly racist. Motives matter. If I shoot a black guy at a Proud Boys rally its still race related and I was there for a reason if I show up with a rifle. And the moment I show up I am a threat and should be treated as such.