Good News for Kyle Rittenhouse

[WillJ8787]

Another uniformed, flat, incorrect, statement.

Gotta love racist...white guy goes out to "protect" sneakers, starts shooting folks because he is both a racist and not trained....and, my oh my...he must be innocent.

This Won't go as the racist think it will.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Another uniformed, flat, incorrect, statement.

Well, if you want your opinion to be considered, you're gonna have to show why he's incorrect instead of just saying so, but...

...where's wearing a uniform play in all this?

 

[WillJ8787]

Well, if you want your opinion to be considered, you're gonna have to show why he's incorrect instead of just saying so, but...

...where's wearing a uniform play in all this?

I think its the universal "white power" uniform he is referring to...white sheets and a pillow case.

 

[jomar]

From I'll I've read about this case, Rittenhouse is the one who came armed. The dead guys didn't. Where does self-defense enter into it?

I hope that Kyle is found innocent. I wish that whole event never happened, but from everything I have seen and heard, he was constantly retreating, constantly trying to get away while people chased after him, shot at him, threw things at him, hit him with skateboards and grabbing for his gun.

It's clearly a case of self defense, and the only reason there is even a trial is because the Left is appalled that anyone would dare to defend themselves against their brown shirts.

Shot at him? Cite?

From the videos I saw the rioters/looters/arsonists were harassing KR some in a non-life threatening manner.

 

[Rightguide]

Gotta love racist...white guy goes out to "protect" sneakers, starts shooting folks because he is both a racist and not trained....and, my oh my...he must be innocent.

This Won't go as the racist think it will.

The only racist I see is you. Rittenhouse acted in self defense.

 

[Rightguide]

Well, if you want your opinion to be considered, you're gonna have to show why he's incorrect instead of just saying so, but...

...where's wearing a uniform play in all this?

I probably wasn't thinking of your SS Grammar uniform when I missed that "n." I made the correction, sorry.

 

[Rightguide]

I think its the universal "white power" uniform he is referring to...white sheets and a pillow case.

Show me a racist post written by me, stupid.

 

[WillJ8787]

The only racist I see is you. Rittenhouse acted in self defense.

And when he is convicted, you will lump in the jury, judge, prosecutors, the community as all being racist as well.

Everyone, who doesn't agree with you....correct?
This is how one tells who is full of shit...correct? Blaming everyone else but yourself.

 

[Rightguide]

And when he is convicted, you will lump in the jury, judge, prosecutors, the community as all being racist as well.

Everyone, who doesn't agree with you....correct?
This is how one tells who is full of shit...correct? Blaming everyone else but yourself.

If he's found guilty, he won't be the first innocent man to go to prison. When and if he's found not guilty, you'll thank the jury for its just decision. right?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

I probably wasn't thinking of your SS Grammar uniform when I missed that "n." I made the correction, sorry.

https://c.tenor.com/LBuCZ6RTYKYAAAAC/ron-weasley-de-nada.gif

You were just being a hapless schmuck as usual, pobrecito.

I'm just here to assist your self-awareness into becoming a better bipedal bag of meat than you were the day before, as futile as that endeavor may be!

https://media4.giphy.com/media/BFYLNwlsSNtcc/200.gif

If he's found guilty, he won't be the first innocent man to go to prison.

'Tis true, my old compadre...the Central Park Five comes to mind.

 

[WillJ8787]

If he's found guilty, he won't be the first innocent man to go to prison. When and if he's found not guilty, you'll thank the jury for its just decision. right?

Probably, when I read through the facts presented in the case and if they support that conclusion. Why don't you do the same....wait for the facts vs. blathering about "your side"? And, I don't thank Jury's for making "the right" decision. I thank them for their service....and for making a decision based on the facts of the case, even when that is difficult or if I disagree with it. That is how a well functioning free society with laws should work.

My personal opinion is....if you don't want to be viewed as a person with a race or hate issue...don't go running into the middle of a crowd of protesting folks, who are protesting the unfair treatment of blacks and minorities by the police, don't go running into that crowd with a weapon thinking what? What good is gonna come of that.

Mr. Rittenhouse has some sort of problem which I can only guess at....and he made the wrong decision, making a bad situation worse for everyone.

 

[Rightguide]

https://c.tenor.com/LBuCZ6RTYKYAAAAC/ron-weasley-de-nada.gif

You were just being a hapless schmuck as usual, pobrecito.

I'm just here to assist your self-awareness into becoming a better bipedal bag of meat than you were the day before, as futile as that endeavor may be!

'Tis true, my old compadre...the Central Park Five comes to mind.

^^^
All Grim Fairy Tales.

 

[Rightguide]

My personal opinion is....if you don't want to be viewed as a person with a race or hate issue...don't go running into the middle of a crowd of protesting folks, who are protesting the unfair treatment of blacks and minorities by the police, don't go running into that crowd with a weapon thinking what? What good is gonna come of that.

My personal opinion is, you're a fucking asshole who likes to blurt out false accusations of racism because you haven't been punched in the mouth enough in your worthless life.

Rittenhouse shot three white "rioters" "looters" and "arsonists." One of them armed with a handgun who were chasing him down the street threatening great bodily injury. Didn't have anything to do with black people, you fucked up dummy.

 

[WillJ8787]

My personal opinion is, you're a fucking asshole who likes to blurt out false accusations of racism because you haven't been punched in the mouth enough in your worthless life.

Rittenhouse shot three white "rioters" "looters" and "arsonists." One of them armed with a handgun who were chasing him down the street threatening great bodily injury. Didn't have anything to do with black people, you fucked up dummy.

Mr. Rittenhouse shot three white protestors, who are not charge with any crimes that I know of.

The protesting that was going on was in response to the shooting of Mr. Blake by police, not three months after the Floyd killing by convicted murderer and police officer Chauvin, who now resides in jail.

The facts of the case have yet to be determined except for those who have predetermined, biased notions in their heads(you for sure).

Mr Rittenhouse, a civilian, had no place being there and what came out of his poor decision are more deaths of folks.

So, when you shoot folks and they die that is serious, the law takes it seriously and it is likely this case could go either way because of the chaotic situation and first hand testimony.

Again, my personal take is don't go down to an event like this with a loaded gun and think you are helping the situation....you are not!.

 

[Rightguide]

Mr. Rittenhouse shot three white protestors, who are not charge with any crimes that I know of.

Stop with the bullshit. Those people were rioting, looting, and burning. They weren't "peacefully protesting" which is all the First Amendment allows. They were armed and there to commit crimes in the chaos they were there to create. Citizens have every right to arm themselves against widespread lawlessness and violence these people assembled there to perpetrate.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Stop with the bullshit. Those people were rioting, looting, and burning. They weren't "peacefully protesting" which is all the First Amendment allows. They were armed and there to commit crimes in the chaos they were there to create. Citizens have every right to arm themselves against widespread lawlessness and violence these people assembled there to perpetrate.

When were they convicted of that?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

^^^
All Grim Fairy Tales.

Grimms'

https://embed.cdn.pais.scholastic.com/v1/channels/tso/products/identifiers/isbn/9780545934909/primary/renditions/700?useMissingImage=true

https://c.tenor.com/ueXbXd2JAiQAAAAM/anderson-cooper-what.gif

please stop breaking my heart, guy. you can't be this basic.

 

[CornusKousa]

It's a homicide case -- of course the dead are victims. No self-defense theory can possibly be in play here.

Of course there can be.

From I'll I've read about this case, Rittenhouse is the one who came armed. The dead guys didn't. Where does self-defense enter into it?

So?? You don't become a victim just because you were dumb enough to start something you couldn't finish.

Stop with the bullshit. Those people were rioting, looting, and burning. They weren't "peacefully protesting" which is all the First Amendment allows. They were armed and there to commit crimes in the chaos they were there to create. Citizens have every right to arm themselves against widespread lawlessness and violence these people assembled there to perpetrate.

The concept of self defense escapes the minds of those who support the initial attacks and violence. They just call it "mostly peaceful protesting" and pretend to be victims when they get fucked up for being part of a violent rioting mob.

When were they convicted of that?

Never....What's it matter? That's not how self defense works.

 

[Wrong Element]

I don't really have a problem with the "victims" thing, since whether or not the deceased are victims in a legal sense is the entire point of the trial.

But allowing the defense to trash the people Rittenhouse killed comes across as the judge putting his thumb on the scale.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Is there some footage that I'm unaware of or eye witnesses that show that these people were not peaceful?

 

[CornusKousa]

Mr Rittenhouse, a civilian, had no place being there

Why not?

Why is it not the rioters who had no place rioting there??

and what came out of his poor decision are more deaths of folks.

Play stupid games win stupid prizes buddy...... you want to go burn peoples lives down and beat up some white folks for being white? You might get shot for doing some shit like that, this is the USA and self defense is a thing here.

Again, my personal take is don't go down to an event like this with a loaded gun and think you are helping the situation....you are not!.

Depends on what you think "helping the situation" is.

We had a few spots that were rallied to protect veterans..... rioters were wise enough to leave the places swarming with heavily armed iraq/afghanistan vets waving their dicks at them... the fuck alone. It was a lot fun actually

 

[Sean Renaud]

We can argue if the rioters had any business being there. Though they did and do. Cops are out of control and we should be protesting. He had no business picking up a gun and going to "defend" shit that wasn't his. It would be one thing if it was his home or business or that of someone he personally knew. He went there with the intent to shoot, or at least threaten to shoot, people who he didn't even know at the time he left his home would be violent. And is there any evidence that the people he shot were violent?

 

[CornusKousa]

We can argue if the rioters had any business being there. Though they did and do.

Considering rioting is illegal, I'm going to say you're wrong.

Cops are out of control and we should be protesting.

Protesting =/= rioting.

The difference is violence and when you get violent, and try to burn someone's life down don't be shocked when you get some push back.

He had no business picking up a gun and going to "defend" shit that wasn't his.

Bullshit...you're just mad he broke your comrades off a piece.

It would be one thing if it was his home or business or that of someone he personally knew.

Nope... totally irrelevant, because rioting and violence is illegal. I don't have to personally know the guy down the street to go help him from having his life destroyed by a bunch of ignorant bigots on a rampage.

He went there with the intent to shoot, or at least threaten to shoot, people who he didn't even know at the time he left his home would be violent.

Good luck proving that LOL

And is there any evidence that the people he shot were violent?

All on camera if you look into it beyond what Salon or RAW tells you.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

The human beings that the little bitch murdered were TOURISTS ON A FAMILY VACATION.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yes we know rioting is illegal, though we have to accept that a certain amount of it is going to happen and will always happen and always has happened. That's just how life works.

I never touch Salon or Raw but thanks for playing.

If you are not law enforcement you going armed to the site of what you even believe is a crime is called vigilante which is just as if not more illegal. He had zero business being there and yes I am mad that we are debating if shooting people for shit that didn't involve you is an actual thing. Its bad enough that we don't prosecute police very often for clearly overreacting to a situation but a civilian getting away with it? Fuck that and anybody who supports this individual.

It isn't self defense if I didn't have a reason to be there in the first place. Sorry, this isn't grade school and the "I'm not touching you" defense shouldn't hold.