Report: Boston public schools excluded white students from events

[RoryN]

Wouldn't surprise me at all if true - racism comes in all forms in that city.

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2021/10...lue-lives-matter-parents-defending-education/

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Someone needs to sit america down and have a long talk with her about what is right and what is wrong.

 

[YDB95]

There are two sides to that story, and that link doesn't even provide too many details of one side.

Besides, they're right, "Blue lives matter" IS associated with white supremacy.

 

[Lazaran]

There are two sides to that story, and that link doesn't even provide too many details of one side.

Besides, they're right, "Blue lives matter" IS associated with white supremacy.

I had to explain this to my white brethren when the debate came up about "Blue lives matter" vs "Black lives matter".

Blue lives matter was an obvious trolling of black lives matter, and was designed to minimize or dismiss what was happening to black people in America. The same with "All lives matter".

If people really cared about police lives and not about trolling the black lives matter movement, they could have easily come up with a different slogan.

 

[CornusKousa]

Suddenly there is a problem with racial equity and social justice???

I thought this was PROGRESS!!

 

[YDB95]

Incidentally, the headline says "Boston public schools," but it's actually in the suburb of Wellesley, which is best known for the blueblood women's college of the same name and is just as white-bread as that would suggest. If they're excluding white kids, there probably aren't very many students who are eligible to begin with.

 

[WillJ8787]

Suddenly there is a problem with racial equity and social justice???

I thought this was PROGRESS!!

No, just a problem with you racists as usual. Same old same old.

Good morning racist.

 

[CornusKousa]

No, just a problem with you racists as usual. Same old same old.

Good morning racist.

I'm not running Boston, Massachusetts or their education system.

I don't support racial segregation either.

That would be "progressive" (D)'eez who are all on about that.... thats your kind of racist.

Good morning racist.

 

[butters]

Wouldn't surprise me at all if true - racism comes in all forms in that city.

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2021/10...lue-lives-matter-parents-defending-education/

it's hard to determine what's really gone down here, as the article states 'certain students' were invited but no white students. Now perhaps there were also a bunch on non-white students also not invited... i don't know and the article doesn't tell us exactly what the meeting was or who was invited and why.

IF it was a meeting that should involve any and all students, as something that will affect them all, then every student should have been invited to attend. this stands true, and applicable to all:

“It is fundamentally un-American to discriminate against students or separate students, segregate students, treat them differently, on the basis of race. It’s un-American and also it’s unconstitutional.”

 

[butters]

http://defendinged.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2-768x432.png

thankyou for that

would you say this kind of safe-space meeting is akin to–for example–lgbtq meetings inasmuch as those students might feel safer to express their true feelings when in a group of people who share their experiences? that they don't have to spend time and energy 'explaining' the reasons why certain things are making them angry/sad/frightened , time that would be stripped from the purpose of their processing things personally?

i'm somewhat torn, though... while i hope i understand the premise (as much as any caucasian person might), wouldn't it be better to address the issue as a whole student body? that violence against one student/american is violence against all? that violence against any culture or heritage is simply unacceptable in america? perhaps they were already holding meetings or assemblies covering that very topic and this specific meeting was to cover the more personal issues the general assembly didn't/wasn't able to address.

it's a really sad state of affairs when children feel they need that safe space away from other students, and adults are entirely to blame for this.

 

[nowisthetime]

There are two sides to that story, and that link doesn't even provide too many details of one side.

Besides, they're right, "Blue lives matter" IS associated with white supremacy.

Blue Lives Don't Matter when it's a bunch of white rednecks targeting cops, funny how that works, when cops are shot up mainly by white perpetrators.

 

[CornusKousa]

Blue Lives Don't Matter when it's a bunch of white rednecks targeting cops, funny how that works, when cops are shot up mainly by white perpetrators.

Well when the cops started stomping on rights because it was easier than facing or dealing with the BLM terrorist???

They lost support.....bigly.

https://c.tenor.com/x1h4LCqbxsQAAAAC/stalley-police.gif

 

[nowisthetime]

No, just a problem with you racists as usual. Same old same old.

Good morning racist.

Proof just because someone is mixed doesn't absolve them from being a racist turd. Some of the most racist people are biracial, combo of one racist jackass parent and a self-hating sycophant POS.

 

[The_Trouvere]

There are two sides to that story, and that link doesn't even provide too many details of one side.

Besides, they're right, "Blue lives matter" IS associated with white supremacy.

And "black lives matter" is associated with black supremacy and the misconception that blacks are more likely to be killed by whites than by black criminals. Actually, blacks are much more likely to be killed by black criminals. Moreover, in nearly every case where a black person is killed by a white person, the black person is a criminal killed at the scene of his most recent crime.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

It's not like this is something new and strange. This has been going on for a while.

 

[YDB95]

And "black lives matter" is associated with black supremacy and the misconception that blacks are more likely to be killed by whites than by black criminals.

No, it's based on the entirely accurate conception that police are prone to uncalled-for brutality against Black suspects. Advocating an end to abuse has nothing to do with "supremacy".

 

[Bud_Spencer]

No, it's based on the entirely accurate conception that police are prone to uncalled-for brutality against Black suspects. Advocating an end to abuse has nothing to do with "supremacy".

Except that isn't true.

 

[YDB95]

Except that isn't true.

Except that it absolutely is.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Except that it absolutely is.

No, not really. This has been looked at and the narrative is false. Cops kill blacks at roughly the same rate as they kill whites, given the relative violent crime rats of the two populations.

 

[CornusKousa]

No, it's based on the entirely accurate conception that police are prone to uncalled-for brutality against Black suspects. Advocating an end to abuse has nothing to do with "supremacy".

This is some delusional, head buried as deep in the sand as you could get it shit right here.

 

[CornusKousa]

Except that it absolutely is.

No it's not... that's why they don't give any fucks when a black cop kills a black cop, or a black cop kills anyone. THAT'S ALL GOOD!!! In fact you lunatics are highly prone to calling anyone who points that out a RACIST!!

BLM is about racial power and privileges and black people getting some over whitey.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

http://defendinged.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2-768x432.png

People are upset over this? Lol

How the mighty have fallen.

 

[CornusKousa]

People are upset over this? Lol

How the mighty have fallen.

So you support institutionalized racism and racial segregation.


That means you support Jim Crow.

 

[YDB95]

No, not really. This has been looked at and the narrative is false. Cops kill blacks at roughly the same rate as they kill whites, given the relative violent crime rats of the two populations.

"This has been looked at..." by whom, exactly?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

"This has been looked at..." by whom, exactly?

Roland Fryer at Harvard:

A new study of over a thousand police-involved shootings found what researcher Harvard Prof. Roland G. Fryer Jr. calls “the most surprising result of my career”: There is no racial bias in police-involved shootings. Not only are blacks not more likely to be fired upon by police than whites in tense moments, the study found that, if anything, they are less likely to be shot at.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-study-no-racial-bias-police-involved-shootings-james-barrett