Climate Change: Has the Woke Joke of the Left Ended it Yet? - Keep me updated, thanks

[score_keeper]

It's been talked about for forever, but 'Many experts point to 1988 as a critical turning point when watershed events placed global warming in the spotlight,' so I'm guessing you've stopped it by now, right?

If not, that's extraordinarily ineffective of you.

Surely, students skipping school to protest climate change solved the problem, right?

Since we're on the subject, what else was done that fixed climate change?

 

[pecksniff]

Nothing, because there are far too many 1) politically influential business interests who would be hurt by any effective remedial measure, and 2) voters who will blindly follow the pro-biz party for unrelated cultural reasons.

 

[score_keeper]

I'll keep checking then, I 'know' one day you Lefties will get the job done.

 

[pecksniff]

I'll keep checking then, I 'know' one day you Lefties will get the job done.

You had better hope so.

 

[Veroe]

You had better hope so.

More like his kids and grandkids better hope so.

 

[bellisarius]

Nothing, because there are far too many 1) politically influential business interests who would be hurt by any effective remedial measure, and 2) voters who will blindly follow the pro-biz party for unrelated cultural reasons.

That's right. It's a politically manufactured crisis.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I've noticed how the media never really go back and revisit the dire predictions of the warmist Chicken-Littles, do they?

Maybe things aren't as bad as they say, and they're just using the climate to arrogate more power to a ruthless, amoral and incompetent ruling class.

 

[bellisarius]

Peterson on "Climate Change."

 

[ll74]

Peterson on "Climate Change."

Cool...psychologists have the best perspective on science. :/

 

[bellisarius]

Cool...psychologists have the best perspective on science. :/

Didn't even watch the video, did ya? You have NOTHING to contribute.

 

[ll74]

Didn't even watch the video, did ya? You have NOTHING to contribute.

I don't care what a psychologist thinks about climate change

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Peterson on "Climate Change."

That was fucking awesome.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I don't care what a psychologist thinks about climate change

But those Swedish teenagers, they're da bomb.

 

[ll74]

But those Swedish teenagers, they're da bomb.

Good non sequitur

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Good non sequitur

We just had a thread where, to a person, the Left here lavished praise on a shrieking leftist Swede teen and admonished us all to heed her lunatic pronouncements on the environment. Pecky went to far as to declare her "accomplishments" as far superior to building gleaming skyscrapers.

So GFY, loser.

 

[ll74]

We just had a thread where, to a person, the Left here lavished praise on a shrieking leftist Swede teen and admonished us all to heed her lunatic pronouncements on the environment. Pecky went to far as to declare her "accomplishments" as far superior to building gleaming skyscrapers.

So GFY, loser.

And why do I care about someone else's discussion that I wasn't involved in?

Go talk to them about that.

 

[GeorgeSoros]

I don't care what a psychologist thinks about climate change

You certainly didn’t miss anything. This is what you get when you interrogate an expert on something outside their field.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

You certainly didn’t miss anything. This is what you get when you interrogate an expert on something outside their field.

Peterson spent two years on a UN panel looking at this issue. If you had watched the video, you'd have known that.

So what did he say that's untrue?

 

[ll74]

You certainly didn’t miss anything. This is what you get when you interrogate an expert on something outside their field.

When the above analysis from Bud is "that was awesome", their echo chamber bullshit is evident

 

[Bud_Spencer]

When the above analysis from Bud is "that was awesome", their echo chamber bullshit is evident

You're free to rebut his specific points. That's tougher than the usual dishonest snark, however, so tread lightly.

 

[ll74]

You're free to rebut his specific points. That's tougher than the usual dishonest snark, however, so tread lightly.

I already commented on the video. But thanks for playing.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I already commented on the video. But thanks for playing.

Not specifically. What did he say that was in error?

 

[GeorgeSoros]

Peterson spent two years on a UN panel looking at this issue. If you had watched the video, you'd have known that.

So what did he say that's untrue?

I watched enough of the video to know it’s bunk. And his involvement on the UN committee consisted of advising RIM CEO.

 

[ll74]

Not specifically. What did he say that was in error?

Very specifically. Reading comprehension ftw

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Very specifically. Reading comprehension ftw

You sniffed that he's a psychologist...that's as "specific" as you got. It's true, but not really germane to his argument, which was multi-layered: That even if it's happening, we don't know what to do about it, so the trillions proposed to remedy it may be ineffective or even worsen the problem, and that those same resources, applied elsewhere, like in child development and nutrition, might be better investments toward the same goal.

You ignored all that in favor of your usual empty snark.