Biden Administration Launches Civil Rights Probes against Five States with Mask Manda

[AlterErgo]

Biden Administration Launches Civil Rights Probes against Five States with Mask Mandate Bans


same Gaga*Biden Admin that KILLS KIDS FROM THE SKY

 

[ll74]

Good

 

[AlterErgo]

kill babies

COOL


no mask? SUE EM!

 

[ll74]

kill babies

COOL


no mask? SUE EM!

Yes, because that is not a false equivalency at all () *. o

 

[CornusKousa]

Good

Confirmation that Comrade74 is in fact an authoritarian and totalitarian leftist control freak.

When will (R)'s do something to put these covid Nazis in check??

Probably never, because the only thing more fuckin' puss puss than a commie.... is a "conservative".

 

[Champakian]

Conservatives keep making one basic mistake, which
we who post here regularly are not susceptible to,
and that is that they are reasonable people dealing
with similarly reasonable people who share a common
goal when nothing could be further from the truth.
When Conservatives compromise, the Liberals celebrate
like it's (August) 2021 at the Kabul airport. Liberals
do not compromise. They are engaged in Secular Jihad.
This is why they are soft on Holy Jihad...

 

[CornusKousa]

Conservatives keep making one basic mistake, which
we who post here regularly are not susceptible to,
and that is that they are reasonable people dealing
with similarly reasonable people who share a common
goal when nothing could be further from the truth.
When Conservatives compromise, the Liberals celebrate
like it's (August) 2021 at the Kabul airport. Liberals
do not compromise. They are engaged in Secular Jihad.
This is why they are soft on Holy Jihad...

They also make the mistake of thinking they are dealing with liberals.

Maoist are NOT liberals.

 

[Champakian]

Decent enough point...

I am appalled at what has become of my grandfather's and father's party.
It has turned its back on the working man to curry favor with the intellectual radical.

 

[ll74]

Conservatives keep making one basic mistake, which
we who post here regularly are not susceptible to,
and that is that they are reasonable people dealing
with similarly reasonable people who share a common
goal when nothing could be further from the truth.
When Conservatives compromise, the Liberals celebrate
like it's (August) 2021 at the Kabul airport. Liberals
do not compromise. They are engaged in Secular Jihad.
This is why they are soft on Holy Jihad...

With the virus and the vaccine, people who seek a conclusion to the pandemic, in any palpable way, in any realistic way, add proper weight to those groups that have the proper amount of resources and expertise on the subject matter. Then there are those who distrust their own doctor who seek out validation for their irresponsibility by finding outliers on the internet.

It's fine to be a skeptic, but if you are such an extreme skeptic that you can't even trust the one person who is tasked with promoting your health, personally, you're being ignorant.

 

[CornusKousa]

With the virus and the vaccine, people who seek a conclusion to the pandemic, in any palpable way, in any realistic way, add proper weight to those groups that have the proper amount of resources and expertise on the subject matter. Then there are those who distrust their own doctor who seek out validation for their irresponsibility by finding outliers on the internet.

It's fine to be a skeptic, but if you are such an extreme skeptic that you can't even trust the one person who is tasked with promoting your health, personally, you're being ignorant.

Doctors aren't the ones turning Covid into political authoritarianism and legal persecution of the other.

Doctors aren't taking peoples kids away because their doctor told them not to get vaccinated.

Doctors aren't going after states for not doing things how Democrats want.

Political activist are.....check your "proper weight" there champ, your scale is way off and you're deep into "anti-American" territory.

 

[Champakian]

Get back to me when the final cure for the flu or the common cold is discovered.



Masks only pushed nature into the future, and barely at that. They stopped nothing.
They had no impact upon the mortality rate, but it gave the Science-challenged
a false sense of superiority which is usually sadly lacking in their lives.

It was nothing more than feel-good politics and as pointed out before,
just another way to divide us along existent political fault lines.

Divide et impera.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Get back to me when the final cure for the flu or the common cold is discovered.



Masks only pushed nature into the future, and barely at that. They stopped nothing.
They had no impact upon the mortality rate, but it gave the Science-challenged
a false sense of superiority which is usually sadly lacking in their lives.

It was nothing more than feel-good politics and as pointed out before,
just another way to divide us along existent political fault lines.

Divide et impera.

Masks did, and do exactly what they are promoted to do, offer some protection against the virus, and help to slow the spread, thus flattening the curve.

That you are to fucking stupid to understand that, ( the Math/Statistics numbers are out there, model them yourself, since you claim to have a mathematical/statistics background) is no one's fault, but your own.

Dwell in your ignorance. Come on here and post your stupidity, and you will get called out and shown you're a fool every-time.

 

[ll74]

Get back to me when the final cure for the flu or the common cold is discovered.



Masks only pushed nature into the future, and barely at that. They stopped nothing.
They had no impact upon the mortality rate, but it gave the Science-challenged
a false sense of superiority which is usually sadly lacking in their lives.

It was nothing more than feel-good politics and as pointed out before,
just another way to divide us along existent political fault lines.

Divide et impera.

Masks are a mechanism to reduce transmission. It's not meant to eliminate the virus, but, as with the social distancing and even the lockdowns, is meant to delay the spread enough so that people can get vaccinated. Once enough people are vaccinated, the virus will be manageable. That's the entire point......getting to where the virus isn't putting people in hospitals or, worst case, killing lots of people.

It's not a simple equation, as so many make it. Public health never is. stats like "death" or "survival" rate are useless in it though......too many people rationalizing why they shouldn't be required to do anything based on shit they find on the internet are making it more difficult overall.

 

[CornusKousa]

Masks are a mechanism to reduce transmission. It's not meant to eliminate the virus, but, as with the social distancing and even the lockdowns, is meant to delay the spread enough so that people can get vaccinated. Once enough people are vaccinated, the virus will be manageable. That's the entire point......getting to where the virus isn't putting people in hospitals or, worst case, killing lots of people.

It's not a simple equation, as so many make it. Public health never is. stats like "death" or "survival" rate are useless in it though......too many people rationalizing why they shouldn't be required to do anything based on shit they find on the internet are making it more difficult overall.

Funny how we went from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to any amount of authoritarian thuggery needed to "getting to where the virus isn't putting people in hospitals".

 

[BidudeinWi]

Masks are a mechanism to reduce transmission. It's not meant to eliminate the virus, but, as with the social distancing and even the lockdowns, is meant to delay the spread enough so that people can get vaccinated. Once enough people are vaccinated, the virus will be manageable. That's the entire point......getting to where the virus isn't putting people in hospitals or, worst case, killing lots of people.

It's not a simple equation, as so many make it. Public health never is. stats like "death" or "survival" rate are useless in it though......too many people rationalizing why they shouldn't be required to do anything based on shit they find on the internet are making it more difficult overall.

1. Masks are fucking useless! Get it through your head. Fauci said it himself in an email. A virus has NO problem going through a mask unless it’s a properly fitted N95.

2. “Deaths” and “survival rates” are NOT “useless” in “public health” policy decisions. They are critical pieces of information. How you can argue that point is beyond me.

3. The CDC illegally changed the rules for filling out death certificates as well as for reporting positive tests. Additionally, they changed the number of amplification cycles for a PCR test to a level that erroneously overstates “positive” covid cases. They stated this on their own website. Hence, the case numbers and death counts are misleading AF!

 

[ll74]

1. Masks are fucking useless! Get it through your head. Fauci said it himself in an email. A virus has NO problem going through a mask unless it’s a properly fitted N95.

2. “Deaths” and “survival rates” are NOT “useless” in “public health” policy decisions. They are critical pieces of information. How you can argue that point is beyond me.

3. The CDC illegally changed the rules for filling out death certificates as well as for reporting positive tests. Additionally, they changed the number of amplification cycles for a PCR test to a level that erroneously overstates “positive” covid cases. They stated this on their own website. Hence, the case numbers and death counts are misleading AF!

1. Masks are not useless. That is why the CDC recommends them. They reduce the transmission of the virus, even when masks are not worn 100% properly. To think that a public health agency would recommend something to improve public health that is actually useless is just absolute stupidity. Any person with half of a brain cell would understand that an agency with the largest resources in the world to address public health, might have better reasoning than the website you found on the internet, for their recommendations.
2. "death" and "survival" rate as a whole number differ from person to person, therefore using it to understand your own risk is useless. Having an average is nice, but you must factor in a myriad of other factors in order to properly assess your risk. The reason why I said it was useless, is because those who tend to use those "rates" are the ones who can't properly determine the ACTUAL rate in their situation.
3. Incorrect. The actual positive rate is probably much higher, as many people have had covid but have not been counted because they did not address it through a physician.

 

[BidudeinWi]

1. Masks are not useless. That is why the CDC recommends them. They reduce the transmission of the virus, even when masks are not worn 100% properly. To think that a public health agency would recommend something to improve public health that is actually useless is just absolute stupidity. Any person with half of a brain cell would understand that an agency with the largest resources in the world to address public health, might have better reasoning than the website you found on the internet, for their recommendations.
2. "death" and "survival" rate as a whole number differ from person to person, therefore using it to understand your own risk is useless. Having an average is nice, but you must factor in a myriad of other factors in order to properly assess your risk. The reason why I said it was useless, is because those who tend to use those "rates" are the ones who can't properly determine the ACTUAL rate in their situation.
3. Incorrect. The actual positive rate is probably much higher, as many people have had covid but have not been counted because they did not address it through a physician.

If you can smell a fart when wearta mask, a microscopic virus can get through it too.

The size of a govt. funded organization has no bearing on whether the information it produces or claims to produce, is accurate and truthful. Is it possible that the CDC has a political agenda? Is it possible that the CDC is corrupted at all? If you want to wholeheartedly believe what the government tells you, go ahead. I treat everything I hear from government with skepticism, BECAUSE THEY’VE EARNED IT!

 

[ll74]

If you can smell a fart when wearta mask, a microscopic virus can get through it too.

The size of a govt. funded organization has no bearing on whether the information it produces or claims to produce, is accurate and truthful. Is it possible that the CDC has a political agenda? Is it possible that the CDC is corrupted at all? If you want to wholeheartedly believe what the government tells you, go ahead. I treat everything I hear from government with skepticism, BECAUSE THEY’VE EARNED IT!

That is incorrect. That's just as dumb as saying that the "virus is smaller than oxygen" so masks don't work. Viruses don't transmit in singular form....they are expressed in multiples attached to mucus, which is stopped by masks.

You're an idiot.

 

[BidudeinWi]

That is incorrect. That's just as dumb as saying that the "virus is smaller than oxygen" so masks don't work. Viruses don't transmit in singular form....they are expressed in multiples attached to mucus, which is stopped by masks.

You're an idiot.

Go fuck yourself!

Straight from the CDC, dumbfuck:

“ Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Source: THE FUCKING CDC YOU CHERRY PICKER!

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

 

[ll74]

Go fuck yourself!

Straight from the CDC, dumbfuck:

“ Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Source: THE FUCKING CDC YOU CHERRY PICKER!

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

You just cherry picked a study about the flu, which is different than Covid-19.

Can you explain to me why the CDC would suggest face masks, if they, themselves, had evidence that it didn't work against Covid?

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/fl...us that causes,superspreading events than flu.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

You just cherry picked a study about the flu, which is different than Covid-19.

Can you explain to me why the CDC would suggest face masks, if they, themselves, had evidence that it didn't work against Covid?

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/fl...us that causes,superspreading events than flu.

For the same reason the CDC is intensely interested in bullying, gun control and hurtful speech: It's a political organization and its goals are also political, not medical.

 

[ll74]

For the same reason the CDC is intensely interested in bullying, gun control and hurtful speech: It's a political organization and its goals are also political, not medical.

Except that it's not. Masks are proven to prevent transmission of Covid. You idiots who believe otherwise because you misunderstood a study or two are irrelevant to the FACTS.

 

[ll74]

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html

Two studies have been improperly characterized by some sources as showing that surgical or cloth masks offer no benefit. A community-based randomized control trial in Denmark during 2020 assessed whether the use of surgical masks reduced the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers (personal protection) by more than 50%. Findings were inconclusive,54 most likely because the actual reduction in infections was lower. The study was too small (i.e., enrolled about 0.1% of the population) to assess whether masks could decrease transmission from wearers to others (source control). A second study of 14 hospitals in Vietnam during 2015 found that cloth masks were inferior to surgical masks for protection against clinical upper respiratory illness or laboratory-confirmed viral infection.55 The study had a number of limitations including the lack of a true control (no mask) group for comparison, limited source control as hospitalized patients and staff were not masked, unblinded study arm assignments potentially biasing self-reporting of illness, and the washing and re-use of cloth masks by users introducing the risk of infection from self-washing. A follow up study in 2020 found that healthcare workers whose cloth masks were laundered by the hospital were protected equally as well as those that wore medical masks.56

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Except that it's not. Masks are proven to prevent transmission of Covid. You idiots who believe otherwise because you misunderstood a study or two are irrelevant to the FACTS.

N95s have some utility. Cloth and surgical masks are pure theater.

And what the fuck does this have to do with "civil rights?"

 

[ll74]

N95s have some utility. Cloth and surgical masks are pure theater.

And what the fuck does this have to do with "civil rights?"

Incorrect. Masks work to prevent the spread of Covid. Your repeated claims have no merit.

The department said it’s investigating whether these rules discriminate against children with disabilities by making it harder for local school officials to protect students who face an extra risk from Covid-19 due to underlying health conditio