LukSkyFokker
Call me Art
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2020
- Posts
- 13,528
One BiGuy uses memes to express his dumbfuckery.
The other BiGuy uses words.
The other BiGuy uses words.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I get that you don't "believe" in the current pandemic and that, like so many, all you are concerned about is whether you think you will die....and certainly that you are basing your risk on the bullshit you read on the internet. I would prefer that people wanting to "get on with their lives" also understood that getting the vaccine to everyone is the best way to get to that point, but I digress.
The point of the paper you posted was to analyze government overreach during the first few months of the pandemic. I'm sure there are papers out there which disagree with their conclusions as well.
Seriously, THAT is what you think the paper was about? I initially questioned your critical reading skills and that skepticism has just been proven real!
I don’t believe the “pandemic” numbers because the government fucked with the criteria intentionally to over inflate them. It ha NEVER been done before, NEVER! It was likely very illegal. The CDC even admitted they were likely artificially inflated and that the death rate fro covid alone, was closer to 9% of the reported deaths. Approximately 10K deaths. That is hardly a “pandemic!” Again, this, from the CDC website that you so love. But, that’s ok, keep licking the left’s and MSM’S boots, cucky!
....
I don't think anything. The paper header describes it. You believe it to be a study, so I'm not sure your perspective can argue anything, since it isn't one nor does it claim to be one.
I don't care why you distrust the CDC. Your critical thinking skills are handicapped because of that distrust and you demonstrate that with each "argument" you make.
It’s clear you don’t trust what the CDC says either. If you did, you’d be skeptical about the case and death numbers as well as wondering why after 17 years with zero issues, the CDC went rogue on data reporting and death certificate completion. Legit questions not yet answered.
One BiGuy uses memes to express his dumbfuckery.
The other BiGuy uses words.
It's still clear that you're a moron. But please, don't let me stop you from providing more evidence.
Ignorant, obviously uneducated fuckturds like you ARE the problem in America. You believe w/o proof, what the government tells you while tons of evidence and questions go unanswered. Why, cuz you’re likely some blue collar union toting dipship that thinks Biden won, is a “democrat” not a socialist and socialism is good, dumb as fuck low information (God forbid….)voter!
Rejection of basic facts and continued accusations based on faulty understanding is your problem, not mine. Your assertions on what I believe or don't believe is a product of that ignorance.
Information is not knowledge - you are a walking example.
^^ The world thinks you're a moron.
It’s clear you don’t trust what the CDC says either. If you did, you’d be skeptical about the case and death numbers as well as wondering why after 17 years with zero issues, the CDC went rogue on data reporting and death certificate completion. Legit questions not yet answered.
All you do is spew your opinion. If anybody refute you and asks legitimate questions, you have nothing. No answer! You cited no references. You are in capable of intellectually arguing your point of view. It appears you have virtually no grasp of the underlying scientific concerns or questions. In short, you’re the typical liberal headline reader.
Yes, what some Reps on this board claimed IS plausible - that some nombers were fudged, deaths misattributed in order to get funding.
But from that to claim that only 9% of the reported deaths are real?
It's like Alex Jones saying that the Sandy Hook mass shooting was a false flag.
The relatives of the dead must be beyond outrage.
This BidudeinWi is an asshole.
My opinion is the result of critical thinking that involves proper weighting of experts in the field. I've cited multiple references in multiple threads, the majority of which can be found via the agency you hate, the CDC.
You giving me source material of a report (which you say incorrectly is a study) from the website of someone, who is self professed to be against all vaccinations, to be considered on equal footing with the largest pool of resources dedicated to public health IN THE WORLD, and then blaming me because I ridicule your perspective is the epitomy of irony.
The best starting point of any critical analysis is to get expert analysis on subject matter you are attempting to analyze. Politics and corruption certainly run in every circle, but the Trumpian Deep State assertion that everyone is corrupt and so no one can be trusted is the equivalent of a blind man providing play by play at a rugby match.
There are so many basic facts about this pandemic that you start out with a faulty baseline that almost every single aspect you argue is incredibly comical. But I'm sure you can find a random website to rationalize your position every time.....there is one for just about everything you can think of.....hell...Pizzagate is still something that people believe in.
Fuck you and your “critical thinking!” Post your sources of information or STFU!
Rejection of basic facts and continued accusations based on faulty understanding is your problem, not mine. Your assertions on what I believe or don't believe is a product of that ignorance.
Information is not knowledge - you are a walking example.