Moderate Dems rail against Pelosi holding infrastructure bill ‘hostage’

[Counselor706]

House moderate Democrats railed Sunday against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) using the so-called bipartisan infrastructure bill as “leverage” to pass the Democrats’ $3.5 trillion bill.

The moderate Democrats want immediate consideration of the $1.2 trillion so-called bipartisan infrastructure bill, which recently passed through the Senate with the support of 19 Senate Republicans.

The rank-and-file Democrats objected to Pelosi’s holding the bill as leverage to pass the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill.

“We are firmly opposed to holding the president’s infrastructure legislation hostage to reconciliation, risking its passage and the bipartisan support behind it,” they added.

Source

 

[ll74]

Source

The political posturing has already been posted in multiple threads on this same topic.

 

[BBW_T&A_Lover]

It's Breitbart. I'm better off getting a copy of Highlights for Kids for my info.

 

[AlterErgo]

It's Breitbart. I'm better off getting a copy of Highlights for Kids for my info.

Ah, the lover of fat slobs bleats shit

fuckoff

 

[Rightguide]

It's Breitbart. I'm better off getting a copy of Highlights for Kids for my info.

^^^

Not a serious person.

 

[pecksniff]

^^^

Not a serious person.

A more serious person than any who takes Breitbart seriously.

 

[Rightguide]

A more serious person than any who takes Breitbart seriously.

So you're prepared to allege they do not report facts?

 

[pecksniff]

So you're prepared to allege they do not report facts?

Oh, I suppose some facts might slip through, now and then, despite their best vigilance.

 

[bellisarius]

A more serious person than any who takes Breitbart seriously.

Let's see here. The article contains a link to the original op-ed published in the Wash. Post. And that link substantiates what was printed in Breitbart.

You ARE A FUCKING MORON. No wonder you post so much drivel.

 

[Rightguide]

Let's see here. The article contains a link to the original op-ed published in the Wash. Post. And that link substantiates what was printed in Breitbart.

You ARE A FUCKING MORON. No wonder you post so much drivel.

They never look for a hyperlink in the articles, or click on them. All they do is read the headline and shit bitch the source, as if they knew better. These are not serious people.

 

[Rightguide]

Oh, I suppose some facts might slip through, now and then, despite their best vigilance.

No, you're just lazy and willfully ignorant.

 

[pecksniff]

Let's see here. The article contains a link to the original op-ed published in the Wash. Post. And that link substantiates what was printed in Breitbart.

You ARE A FUCKING MORON. No wonder you post so much drivel.

Then it says something, and not something good, that the OP cited to Breitbart rather than WaPo.

 

[Rightguide]

Then it says something, and not something good, that the OP cited to Breitbart rather than WaPo.

What difference does it make, if you are a discerning reader?

 

[YDB95]

Let's see here. The article contains a link to the original op-ed published in the Wash. Post. And that link substantiates what was printed in Breitbart.

For people like you it does, sure.

 

[ll74]

That hostage situation didn't last long

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...en-priorities-climate-immigration/8198252002/

The House approved a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint Tuesday in a straight party-line vote

 

[Lazaran]

That hostage situation didn't last long

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...en-priorities-climate-immigration/8198252002/

The PB's RWCJ had it's whole narrative REKT with a single post.

LMFAO