As Predicted, BLM Attacks Cory Booker

BLM attacks Booker for defund the police vote, says 'NO ONE' in Senate had their back

As I said, the Repubs outmaneuvered the D-bags with their vote-a-rama, forcing D-bag senators to agree that 'Defund the Police' is an idiot's idea and guess what, 50 senators don't speak for the majority of the party.

You can bet if BLM is pissed, there's a shit ton more wokies and progies twisting in the wind.

Chaos, that's what you get when you join the D-bag Party.

But I thought Cori Booker was their leader.

That's what you told us last time....or was it AOC?

Can you maybe make a chart so we can follow or do we request that from Soros?
 
But I thought Cori Booker was their leader.

That's what you told us last time....or was it AOC?

Can you maybe make a chart so we can follow or do we request that from Soros?

*chuckles*
 
But I thought Cori Booker was their leader.

That's what you told us last time....or was it AOC?

Can you maybe make a chart so we can follow or do we request that from Soros?

I see your comprehension skills are still for shit, littleloser74.

Provide the quote where I said any of them was the leader of the D-bag Circus.

[And it's Cory Booker and Cori Bush. Just because they're black doesn't mean they're the same person. I know a racist like you thinks they all look alike, but come on, man, show some respect.]
 
I see your comprehension skills are still for shit, littleloser74.

Provide the quote where I said any of them was the leader of the D-bag Circus.

[And it's Cory Booker and Cori Bush. Just because they're black doesn't mean they're the same person. I know a racist like you thinks they all look alike, but come on, man, show some respect.]

Yep...I combined them to make one super black BLM traitor fascist rioter extraordinare.

Which quote? Every day you take a diff position, but always whoever says something that seems outrageous to you is the true leader of everything you hate and anyone associated with them agrees and wants the same thing. And if someone doesn't acknowledge and disavow them, it makes them immediately complicit
 
BLM always makes me think of Bureau of Land Management. Odd that they would attack Booker, but strangers things have happened.
 
Dissenting and differing voices on the left = normal

Dissenting and differing movies on the right = traitors and are primaries out of the party.
 
BLM attacks Booker for defund the police vote, says 'NO ONE' in Senate had their back

As I said, the Repubs outmaneuvered the D-bags with their vote-a-rama, forcing D-bag senators to agree that 'Defund the Police' is an idiot's idea and guess what, 50 senators don't speak for the majority of the party.

You can bet if BLM is pissed, there's a shit ton more wokies and progies twisting in the wind.

Chaos, that's what you get when you join the D-bag Party.

House members are elected from smaller districts and that's why you can get far left radicals like the squad. Overall these extremists are a small segment of a state's population. Senators have to be a little more moderate because they have to appeal to people across the state.
 
Dissenting and differing voices on the left = normal

Dissenting and differing movies on the right = traitors and are primaries out of the party.

Bullshit. The left's entire platform is whatever Trump is for, we have to be against. You say anything remotely neutral about Trump, you're a traitor.
 
Can you say Liz Cheney...I think you can, and that is just example #1.

Why do you deplorable"s choose to die on the hills where the facts are in open sight to everyone?

Wanna read Joe Manchin's or Tusli Gabbard's emails? I'm sure it's all love and kisses from the Bolsheviks, no?
 
Bullshit. The left's entire platform is whatever Trump is for, we have to be against. You say anything remotely neutral about Trump, you're a traitor.

Lol....that's hilarious. We don't have anyone in the party who has been Cheney'd..sorry.
 
Wanna read Joe Manchin's or Tusli Gabbard's emails? I'm sure it's all love and kisses from the Bolsheviks, no?

What do Manchin or Gabbard have to do with Republicans kicking out their own and threatening to primary them in the next election, other than moving the goalposts in your mind.

You claimed this post by 74 was delusional

Originally Posted by ll74 View Post
"Dissenting and differing voices on the left = normal

Dissenting and differing movies on the right = traitors and are primaries out of the party."


Yet here you are verifying it 100% and you are too stupid to realise that....
 
Can you say Liz Cheney...I think you can, and that is just example #1.

Why do you deplorable"s choose to die on the hills where the facts are in open sight to everyone?

Liz Cheney was the heir apparent for the Bush neo-cons that ran the party and were pushed out. She's not fighting for America, she's fighting for the establishment. Trump left a lot to be desired but the people are tired of the same failed establishment politics of the last 50 years and wanted something different. There will be other Trumps. Hopefully they are smarter and not as impulsive.
 
Delusional.

Cheney? McCain?

How many members ended up not running again because they took an antiTrump position and couldn't bear to face the electorate?

The GOP has no tolerance for dissention.

Either you're with Trump or you're out

The Democratic party publicly dissents mo the egular.

No primary, easy reelection
 
Lol....that's hilarious. We don't have anyone in the party who has been Cheney'd..sorry.

I'll give you that: The Dems would never, ever let a heterodox voice assume a leadership position in the party, so there would never, ever be any need to. Only the true lunatics ever rise on the Left.
 
I'll give you that: The Dems would never, ever let a heterodox voice assume a leadership position in the party, so there would never, ever be any need to. Only the true lunatics ever rise on the Left.

Yes, I get that you believe that.
 
Liz Cheney was the heir apparent for the Bush neo-cons that ran the party and were pushed out. She's not fighting for America, she's fighting for the establishment. Trump left a lot to be desired but the people are tired of the same failed establishment politics of the last 50 years and wanted something different. There will be other Trumps. Hopefully they are smarter and not as impulsive.

I don't give a shit if Cheney wanted to blow Trump in public, and then let him fuck her up the ass.

The point was about how the current Republican party treats their own, when someone has a dissenting voice against the party.

Quit moving goalpost around....if you can't debate the point rationally.
 
Cheney? McCain?

How many members ended up not running again because they took an antiTrump position and couldn't bear to face the electorate?

The GOP has no tolerance for dissention.

Either you're with Trump or you're out

As if. The GOP is filled with linguini-spined squishes who are aching to capitulate at the first opportunity.
 
As if. The GOP is filled with linguini-spined squishes who are aching to capitulate at the first opportunity.

That is true, and you support those people in those position as well. W(hy)TF would you ever elect, or re-elect chicken shits like them to office, if they are too afraid to speak truth to power.....????????????
 
Yes, I get that you believe that.

Name a single Dem grandee that has uttered a peep out of line with party orthodoxy. And then show me how that utterance was greeted with good-natured, chin-stroking and an admission that said utterer might be right.

Ain't happening. He's be denounced as a racist before you can say "CRT."
 
That is true, and you support those people in those position as well. W(hy)TF would you ever elect, or re-elect chicken shits like them to office, if they are too afraid to speak truth to power.....????????????

The GOPe keeps sending us those towers of Jell-O. The alternatives are worse.
 
Back
Top