Google Plotted Against Trump, Deceiving The American People

[Rightguide]

One of Google's Top Engineers Abandons the Company, Reveals Big Tech Rewrote Algorithms for an Insidious Goal

By Kipp Jones
August 17, 2021 at 1:07pm

“As a senior engineer at Google for many years, Zach was aware of their bias, but watched in horror as the 2016 election of Donald Trump seemed to drive them into dangerous territory. The American ideal of an honest, hard-fought battle of ideas — when the contest is over, shaking hands and working together to solve problems — was replaced by a different, darker ethic alien to this country’s history,” the description adds.

Vorhies said he left Google in 2019 with 950 pages of internal documents and gave them to the Justice Department.

All the rest here:

https://www.westernjournal.com/one-...s-big-tech-rewrote-algorithms-insidious-goal/

 

[coati]

Hmmm, imagine that, a Big Tech company was alarmed by a President who strove for totalitarianism.

Sounds like Reichguard feels that media outlets should be much more "fair and balanced" toward wannabe oligarchs who try to overrule an election that was certified in all 50 states.

Tough shit, Reichguard.

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Then dont use Google. Seems simple enough.

 

[AlterErgo]

The DOJ is a criminal orginization

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Here is the damning statement from Vorhies:

“So, with the Trump/[former FBI Director James] Comey thing, they’re able to keep the stories boosted all the way at the top because the algorithm was able to fold a news story into the stories that were preceding it in the last five days,” Vorhies added.

“They allowed the mainstream media to structure their stories so that they could remain at the top of their search index, of their news index,” he continued.

So Google put relevant information into search results. And made search results indexable by search criteria for news about a newsworthy event.

*gasp*

What other insidious goals did they have? Did they also make LINKS to the stories!?!?!

 

[RoryN]

Strange thread. Deplorables usually applaud companies using underhanded tactics to cripple a politician.

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Here is the damning statement from Vorhies:

“So, with the Trump/[former FBI Director James] Comey thing, they’re able to keep the stories boosted all the way at the top because the algorithm was able to fold a news story into the stories that were preceding it in the last five days,” Vorhies added.

“They allowed the mainstream media to structure their stories so that they could remain at the top of their search index, of their news index,” he continued.

So Google put relevant information into search results. And made search results indexable by search criteria for news about a newsworthy event.

*gasp*

What other insidious goals did they have? Did they also make LINKS to the stories!?!?!

Yeah dude, defending Google is bad mojo no matter if they did it or not.

 

[Rightguide]

Then dont use Google. Seems simple enough.

That isn't the point, is it?

 

[WillJ8787]

One of Google's Top Engineers Abandons the Company, Reveals Big Tech Rewrote Algorithms for an Insidious Goal

By Kipp Jones
August 17, 2021 at 1:07pm

“As a senior engineer at Google for many years, Zach was aware of their bias, but watched in horror as the 2016 election of Donald Trump seemed to drive them into dangerous territory. The American ideal of an honest, hard-fought battle of ideas — when the contest is over, shaking hands and working together to solve problems — was replaced by a different, darker ethic alien to this country’s history,” the description adds.

Vorhies said he left Google in 2019 with 950 pages of internal documents and gave them to the Justice Department.

All the rest here:

https://www.westernjournal.com/one-...s-big-tech-rewrote-algorithms-insidious-goal/

I plotted against Trump...arrest me.

It's called supporting the other guy....any other guy.

 

[jaF0]

Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/western-journalism/

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

That isn't the point, is it?

It sure is. You don't like their politics so don't use them. Free market and all that jazz.
Google has been corrupt for years. It's not a secret.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Trump lost because he was a shitty president and a shitty person.

Get over it klownguide.

 

[Paul_Chance]

Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/western-journalism/

"The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst".[2] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[3]"

Might try a different bias checker. (LOL not that I am saying there wrong, but just that it's not a good source. I was just curious, so I looked them up on that other unbiased website - Wikipedia.

 

[Cubantripod]

Trump lost because he was a shitty president and a shitty person.

Get over it klownguide.

So you try to defeat him by running Dubya with dementia?

 

[Cubantripod]

Hmmm, imagine that, a Big Tech company was alarmed by a President who strove for totalitarianism.

Sounds like Reichguard feels that media outlets should be much more "fair and balanced" toward wannabe oligarchs who try to overrule an election that was certified in all 50 states.

Tough shit, Reichguard.

Get over it. You don't like the red tyrant. You like the blue tyrant.

 

[Rightguide]

It sure is. You don't like their politics so don't use them. Free market and all that jazz.
Google has been corrupt for years. It's not a secret.

There aren't any traditional free market controls when they can lie and libel people with impunity and hide behind section 230.

 

[Rightguide]

"The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst".[2] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[3]"

Might try a different bias checker. (LOL not that I am saying there wrong, but just that it's not a good source. I was just curious, so I looked them up on that other unbiased website - Wikipedia.

Fake Views.

 

[coati]

Get over it. You don't like the red tyrant. You like the blue tyrant.

Fuck off with your false equivalency.

Never knew a blue President who tried to overtake the government after his loss in an election was certified by all 50 states.

 

[pecksniff]

That isn't the point, is it?

The point is in post #5 and nowhere else.

 

[pecksniff]

It sure is. You don't like their politics so don't use them. Free market and all that jazz.
Google has been corrupt for years. It's not a secret.

Actually, they have a bit of a problem with that . . .

 

[Cubantripod]

Fuck off with your false equivalency.

Never knew a blue President who tried to overtake the government after his loss in an election was certified by all 50 states.

No false equivalency. You just agree with the Democrats encroachments on the liberties of the people.

 

[jaF0]

You just agree with the Democrats encroachments on the liberties of the people.

Duh ... who is it that's restricting voting rights everywhere they can ?

 

[Philthy_Phil]

So you try to defeat him by running Dubya with dementia?

I didn't run anyone, but joe biden beat his ass and there was no trying involved, just doing.
Trump lost because he is a loser.

 

[ll74]

Sadly, our citizens are idiots who rely on search engines to tell them information.

 

[coati]

No false equivalency. You just agree with the Democrats encroachments on the liberties of the people.

^^^Typical self-absorbed Deplorable. Thinks that attempting to overturn an election that was certified in all 50 states is a "liberty" guaranteed by the Constitution. Equates "liberties" with the pre-teenage concept of "I can do anything I want, no matter what the consequences to others might be, and my parents [the government] have no role in regulating my behavior".