CRT isn't even a theory

[Bud_Spencer]

Mackubin Thomas Owens explains as he lays out the essence of CRT

https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/10/whats-wrong-with-crt/

 

[DeluxAuto]

https://i.imgur.com/jYtGV7m.jpg

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Smartest thing you've posted on the topic yet.

 

[DeluxAuto]

How would you know? You no nothing of the topic.

 

[RobDownSouth]

"Barack Obama was elected president, ergo, CRT is invalid".

Good luck gaining traction with that little canard.

 

[Earthlyone]

Whether they know it or not, proponents of CRT are useful idiots of the wests enemies. It's about bringing white men down. The BRICS countries probably perceive that a west lead by women and ethnic minorities would be easier to defeat or at least achieve more favourable outcomes in trade talks and business, etc.

 

[jaF0]

The thing in ButtSphincter's head isn't even a brain.

 

[ll74]

Whether they know it or not, proponents of CRT are useful idiots of the wests enemies. It's about bringing white men down. The BRICS countries probably perceive that a west lead by women and ethnic minorities would be easier to defeat or at least achieve more favourable outcomes in trade talks and business, etc.

Your entire narrative is based on racism and an idea that isn't actually real

 

[Earthlyone]

Whether they know it or not, proponents of CRT are useful idiots of the wests enemies. It's about bringing white men down. The BRICS countries probably perceive that a west lead by women and ethnic minorities would be easier to defeat or at least achieve more favourable outcomes in trade talks and business, etc.

...and if anyone points this out then they are accused of being racist or get gaslighted.

Your entire narrative is based on racism and an idea that isn't actually real

See what I mean?!

 

[ll74]

...and if anyone points this out then they are accused of being racist or get gaslighted.



See what I mean?!

It's just a simple fact - your position is based on the west being ruined by blacks and being owned by whites. Both positions are absolutely incorrect and both are racist pure and simple. Whites dont own the west and blacks have the same capabilities as whites.

 

[Earthlyone]

It's just a simple fact - your position is based on the west being ruined by blacks and being owned by whites. Both positions are absolutely incorrect and both are racist pure and simple. Whites dont own the west and blacks have the same capabilities as whites.

It's not that women and ethnic minorities are less capable, just less inclined, perhaps, to put western interests first, which of course the wests competitors would take advantage of that.

 

[ll74]

It's not that women and ethnic minorities are less capable, just less inclined, perhaps, to put western interests first, which of course the wests competitors would take advantage of that.

Yes, I get that you think less of non-white men. If only there were a word that defined what that is.

 

[Earthlyone]

Yes, I get that you think less of non-white men. If only there were a word that defined what that is.

Your narrative about me hasn't been thought through properly has it?

Most of the west's competitors/enemies are of course non white, so implicit in what I'm saying is that non whites are quite capable.

 

[Lazaran]

Yes, I get that you think less of non-white men. If only there were a word that defined what that is.

I'm having a hard time deciding if Eartlyone is Dumb, Deplorable, or Both.

After that last comment I'm leaning towards Both.

*nods*

 

[Lazaran]

Your narrative about me hasn't been thought through properly has it?

Most of the west's competitors/enemies are of course non white, so implicit in what I'm saying is that non whites are quite capable.

It isn't about who you suggested was capable.

It's about who you identified as incapable.

JFC

 

[Earthlyone]

It isn't about who you suggested was capable.

It's about who you identified as incapable.

JFC

Again, it's not about women and minorities being "incapable" it's more about their inclination, or at least our enemies perceptions of their inclinations. The Argentinians found out the hard way what Margaret Thatcher was made of.

 

[ll74]

Your narrative about me hasn't been thought through properly has it?

Most of the west's competitors/enemies are of course non white, so implicit in what I'm saying is that non whites are quite capable.

I have no narrative. You are describing your position and that position is clearly racist.

You're claiming the west is superior and that the white men are the reason.

 

[ll74]

I'm having a hard time deciding if Eartlyone is Dumb, Deplorable, or Both.

After that last comment I'm leaning towards Both.

*nods*

Racists don't like being called racist because they don't think that they're racist

 

[Earthlyone]

I have no narrative. You are describing your position and that position is clearly racist.

You're claiming the west is superior and that the white men are the reason.

OK whatever. All I'll say to you is...be careful what you wish for.

 

[Lazaran]

Again, it's not about women and minorities being "incapable" it's more about their inclination, or at least our enemies perceptions of their inclinations. The Argentinians found out the hard way what Margaret Thatcher was made of.

I'll take your backpeddling as an apology, and as an acknowledgement of your ignorance.

TYVM

 

[Lazaran]

Racists don't like being called racist because they don't think that they're racist

They refuse to recognize the racism blatantly displayed by the traitor in chief, so I'm not surprised they refuse to recognize it in themselves.

*shrugs*

 

[ll74]

OK whatever. All I'll say to you is...be careful what you wish for.

I wish for equal treatment and equal opportunity for all under the law.

I'm sorry that you don't like certain races being allowed that.

 

[ll74]

They refuse to recognize the racism blatantly displayed by the traitor in chief, so I'm not surprised they refuse to recognize it in themselves.

*shrugs*

Well, as he said...he sees non whites as "capable", but what he really means is...they are inferior and they aren't good enough to be part of his country...but he doesn't want to deny them their own country...just not his

 

[Bud_Spencer]

How would you know? You no nothing of the topic.

You just can't make this shit up, I swear.

I've cited CRT developers, professors and proponents countless times to support every contention. All I get in return is that the quotes are "out of context" (yet my critics don't ever put them into context, despite the page numbers in the citations) and I'm stupid.

So tell me, what is CRT all about...and cite your sources.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

"Barack Obama was elected president, ergo, CRT is invalid".

Good luck gaining traction with that little canard.

Obama wasn't elected twice? He didn't get the white vote? What's a "canard" about it?

You dopes are confirming the author's point: You cannot ever put this "theory" to the test, it's that empty and unsupported.