The NSA Does Not Deny Reading Tucker Carlson’s Emails

?? It's gotten far worse.

Indeed, one phenomenon of tyrannies the world over is now a feature of the federal government: The melding of Party and State. DC votes, what?, 95-98% Democrat? In a very real sense, the President is not really in charge of the Executive.
 
Right, they never comment on anything. You got nothing... Neither does dipshit Tucker....

Oh, but they did comment. A couple of times. And neither of those comments said, "of course we aren't reading his emails and texts."
 
Indeed, one phenomenon of tyrannies the world over is now a feature of the federal government: The melding of Party and State. DC votes, what?, 95-98% Democrat? In a very real sense, the President is not really in charge of the Executive.

The vote in DC has never had any effect on federal policy.
 
You can't possibly be this obtuse.

If "DC votes, what?, 95-98% Democrat?" that fact has never had any effect on federal policy. Nor is it a reliable guide to the politics of federal civil servants, who are only a minority of the city's population, and most of whom are not even that -- they live in the 'burbs and do not vote in DC anyway.
 
If "DC votes, what?, 95-98% Democrat?" that fact has never had any effect on federal policy. Nor is it a reliable guide to the politics of federal civil servants, who are only a minority of the city's population, and most of whom are not even that -- they live in the 'burbs and do not vote in DC anyway.

Then they go to work and quietly undermine the policy of non-Dem administrations.

Yes, you are that obtuse.
 
Then they go to work and quietly undermine the policy of non-Dem administrations.

Yes, you are that obtuse.

No, you are that dishonest. The "Deep State" does not in that sense exist. The Deep State that does exist favors neither party.
 
No, you are that dishonest. The "Deep State" does not in that sense exist. The Deep State that does exist favors neither party.

That's why we've seen so many of Joe Biden's call transcripts with foreign leaders leaked up to now, eh? Why we've seen Hunter perp-walked for his multiple crimes?
 
That's why we've seen so many of Joe Biden's call transcripts with foreign leaders leaked up to now, eh? Why we've seen Hunter perp-walked for his multiple crimes?

If the Trump Admin leaked like a sieve, which it did, the leakers were not Democrats or Deep State operatives. Hunter is completely irrelevant; better to ask why Trump has not been perp-walked. And none of this would have anything to do with DC voting patterns.
 
If the Trump Admin leaked like a sieve, which it did, the leakers were not Democrats or Deep State operatives. Hunter is completely irrelevant; better to ask why Trump has not been perp-walked. And none of this would have anything to do with DC voting patterns.

The leaks were from the intelligence community, and there were dozens.

Even Cuck Schemer noted that the IC would get back at Trump for his comments about them, and they did.

They are a tool of the Democrat Party. Not all...but most.
 
The leaks were from the intelligence community, and there were dozens.

Even Cuck Schemer noted that the IC would get back at Trump for his comments about them, and they did.

They are a tool of the Democrat Party. Not all...but most.

That is completely insane.
 
The FBI no longer plants agents provocateur in dissident movements, COINTELPRO-style -- we can be sure because that would nowadays be impossible to keep secret.

Aside from being full of crap on the subject, you have absolutely no way of affirming what you just said.
 
That is completely insane.

That there were dozens of leaks? That's undeniable.

That Schumer said the IC was vindictive and had many ways to get back at Trump? Undeniable

That the bureaucracy is a Democrat monolith? Also undeniable.

It's quite common in countries where the Central State is far too powerful. Egypt come to mind.
 
Back
Top