So, Maxine Waters is openly calling for violence in the streets...

Champakian

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Posts
13,119
But all of those posters who blamed Trump for inciting violence have
gone silent which seems to indicate that they condone their violence.



Is this because of her race? gender? PARTY???



;) ;)
 
But all of those posters who blamed Trump for inciting violence have
gone silent which seems to indicate that they condone their violence.



Is this because of her race? gender? PARTY???



;) ;)


Inciting people to revolt against a legitimate verdict by a jury of his peers is an affront to the very fabric of our nation and laws. Maxine Waters and Rashida Tlalb
*TOOK AN OATH TO UPHOLD AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION* should be expelled from congress.

https://nypost.com/2021/04/18/maxine-waters-attends-protest-over-police-killing-of-daunte-wright/

“We’ve got to stay in the streets, and we’ve got to demand justice,” she urged the crowd, according to one tweeted clip.

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict” in Derek Chauvin’s trial for the police killing of George Floyd, where deliberations will begin next week, she said.

“And if we don’t, we cannot go away,” she added. “We’ve got to get more confrontational.”
 
If you’re calling peaceful protests “violence,” what shall we call the 1/6 Capitol event?
 
"Peaceful protests" do not result in the destruction of property,
so one can only wonder what her calls for action will result in.

I don't think she is being a calming influence in any way...
 
"Peaceful protests" do not result in the destruction of property,
so one can only wonder what her calls for action will result in.

I don't think she is being a calming influence in any way...
Would you like a calming influence? A knee on your neck might do.
 
Without a bad attitude towards society and the police, the guy would still be alive.

Apologists for that community fuel that bad attitude by reminding the criminal element
that they are the victims, no matter who they are victimizing, including, in this case,

the police that are there to protect the community from the real criminals...


Maxine is calling for mistrust of the police and that leads her community
to even greater and bolder crimes and renewed antipathy towards the law.
 
Without a bad attitude towards society and the police, the guy would still be alive.

Apologists for that community fuel that bad attitude by reminding the criminal element
that they are the victims, no matter who they are victimizing, including, in this case,

the police that are there to protect the community from the real criminals...


Maxine is calling for mistrust of the police and that leads her community
to even greater and bolder crimes and renewed antipathy towards the law.
What does “her community” refer to?

Oh, racist dog whistle. Got it.
 
Calling for confrontation in the streets is one thing but refusing to accept a verdict by jurors is undermining the legitimacy and integrity of our courts, our constitutionally adopted legal system, a system she took an oath to protect and defend while she flips our legal system on its head.
 
Last edited:
Calling for confrontation in the streets is one thing but refusing to accept a verdict by jurors is undermining the integrity of our courts, our constitutionally adopted legal system, a system she took an oath to protect and defend while she flips our legal system on its head.
Yet politicians on both sides think it’s essential to establish control over the courts. Why would that be, if the courts have such integrity?
 
Yet politicians on both sides think it’s essential to establish control over the courts. Why would that be, if the courts have such integrity?

One side wants courts to rule in accordance with black-letter law, the other wants courts to implement the party's policy preferences, thus destroying the Rule of Law.

There is no comparison.
 
As someone who actually read the article, I'm not seeing any call for open violence by anyone. Then again, I'm not a hysterical whiny little bitch.

“We’ve got to stay in the streets, and we’ve got to demand justice,” she urged the crowd, according to one tweeted clip.

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict” in Derek Chauvin’s trial for the police killing of George Floyd, where deliberations will begin next week, she said.

“And if we don’t, we cannot go away,” she added. “We’ve got to get more confrontational.”

Asked about the curfew, she said, “I don’t know what curfew means,” according to another tweeted clip.

“A curfew means that ‘I want y’all to stop talking,'” she said, adding, “I don’t agree with it.”

Waters said she wouldn’t stay out at the protest much longer personally — but she urged everyone else to keep at it.

“I came here for one reason, just to be here, to make sure that I let my thoughts be heard among all of those who have spent so much time on the streets. And so I’m hopeful that the protests will continue,” she said.
 
AJ has long held that murder is a proper response for property damage, but property damage is an inappropriate response for murder.

BoBo's corollary: More than one white person marching is a "protest", more than one non-white person marching is a "riot"
 
BoBo's corollary: More than one white person marching is a "protest", more than one non-white person marching is a "riot"

This is another projection by Rob.

I don't determine riot vs protest by skin color.

Rob, just like all the other white guilt laden "social vengeance" leftist, decides EVERYTHING based on skin color.
 
Back
Top