Avenger of family

CFNMhubby

Really Experienced
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Posts
129
Sexual Avenger

With the overwhelming amount of inquiries for stories involving incest on here. It would be fun to create a story about a woman who is somewhat of an avenger or vigilante who tracks down all the men and women on lit who love incest and having their family members get an opportunity torture them and the castrate them afterward so they can’t be sexually disturbing individuals anymore.
 
Last edited:
To avoid severe criticism, I recommend you only allude to fucking, don't describe any, and post this dark tale in Non-Erotic. For a quaint twist, your Avenging Angel teams up with a partner she falls for... who turns out to be her birth brother, separated at birth. What ensues?
 
To avoid severe criticism, I recommend you only allude to fucking, don't describe any, and post this dark tale in Non-Erotic. For a quaint twist, your Avenging Angel teams up with a partner she falls for... who turns out to be her birth brother, separated at birth. What ensues?

It would be an interesting plot twist for sure but I would not want them to end of having a sexual relationship. Kind of the opposite of the point I’d like the story to make lol
 
It would be an interesting plot twist for sure but I would not want them to end of having a sexual relationship. Kind of the opposite of the point I’d like the story to make lol
If kept out of Incest-Taboo as I suggested, their lack of sex would work fine. Thus the twist's consequences. Does she go all vengeful on him, or on herself, or not? Does she quit avenging? Does she feel guilt over her incestuous urge? How does her behavior evolve? What ending do you want?
 
If kept out of Incest-Taboo as I suggested, their lack of sex would work fine. Thus the twist's consequences. Does she go all vengeful on him, or on herself, or not? Does she quit avenging? Does she feel guilt over her incestuous urge? How does her behavior evolve? What ending do you want?

I think if she finds that out she should end up avenging one final time.
 
With the overwhelming amount of inquiries for stories involving incest on here. It would be fun to create a story about a woman who is somewhat of an avenger or vigilante who tracks down all the men and women on lit who love incest and having their family members get an opportunity torture them and the castrate them afterward so they can’t be sexually disturbing individuals anymore.

I think you'll find that "kink shaming" is frowned upon round these parts. This is a site based on fiction. Folks that love reading and writing about incest are not necessarily advocating it. They are just fantasizing. And your narrowmindedness is definitely not appreciated. Beeotch.
 
I think you'll find that "kink shaming" is frowned upon round these parts. This is a site based on fiction. Folks that love reading and writing about incest are not necessarily advocating it. They are just fantasizing. And your narrowmindedness is definitely not appreciated. Beeotch.
always much better when hilarity ensues, followed by a happy ending.
 
always much better when hilarity ensues, followed by a happy ending.
Recovering from tragedy with a positive ending often works, too. Get-em horny, get-em crying, then get-em smiling, and the votes will pour in. We're trying to manipulate readers' emotions, after all.
 
Seriously, how is consanguinamorous love or sex different than interracial love or sex, and mature love or sex, it's a status as opposed to an activity definition.
 
I think you'll find that "kink shaming" is frowned upon round these parts. This is a site based on fiction. Folks that love reading and writing about incest are not necessarily advocating it. They are just fantasizing. And your narrowmindedness is definitely not appreciated. Beeotch.

You’re a troll....and having sex with family members is for losers lol.
 
You’re a troll....and having sex with family members is for losers lol.
Traditionally, it's been for royalty. Oh, those royal luzers, forced to marry siblings! Now if cousins are family, then luzers include Darwin, Poe, Einstein, and Giuliani. I'll vouch for the lattermost.
 
Traditionally, it's been for royalty. Oh, those royal luzers, forced to marry siblings! Now if cousins are family, then luzers include Darwin, Poe, Einstein, and Giuliani. I'll vouch for the lattermost.

Traditionally? Haha you’re a joke maybe it’s a tradition at a trailer park for trashhhh. You are trash. Grow up buddy.
 
Traditionally? Haha you’re a joke maybe it’s a tradition at a trailer park for trashhhh. You are trash. Grow up buddy.

Be polite or please leave Mr. Doesn't Feel Comfortable With Sex Talk on an Erotic Fiction Website.
 
It's interesting to me that anybody would think it's "fun" to write a story about people being tortured and castrated for the fantasy stories they like to read and write.
 
Those unaware of history are condemned to repeat it. Fuck your mother.

How poetic of you, there is plenty of history in the world that we should never repeat. Those who never learn from history will never make progress.
 
It's interesting to me that anybody would think it's "fun" to write a story about people being tortured and castrated for the fantasy stories they like to read and write.
Firstly nobody implied anything about castration though it’s interesting you made that assumption as the punishment in the story. Secondly, there are plenty of stories on here of non-consensual sex and rape so what makes my idea of torture for vengeance any less permissible? I find it intriguing that those who spoke out against my story idea were so easily offended by it. Says a lot about the few people who did.
 
Firstly nobody implied anything about castration though it’s interesting you made that assumption as the punishment in the story. Secondly, there are plenty of stories on here of non-consensual sex and rape so what makes my idea of torture for vengeance any less permissible? I find it intriguing that those who spoke out against my story idea were so easily offended by it. Says a lot about the few people who did.

In your first post you used the word "castrated." That was you, not me.

The issue isn't whether it's permissible. The issue is why any person would think a story about torturing and castrating another person because of the stories that person reads would be fun. It suggests an extreme level of intolerance about other people and their fantasies.

Remember, these are all just fantasies. This isn't real.

If you believe that you can infer from the stories people read that they are "sexually disturbing individuals" then you have no idea what you are talking about. Millions of perfectly normal people read all manner of fantasy erotic stories.
 
In your first post you used the word "castrated." That was you, not me.

The issue isn't whether it's permissible. The issue is why any person would think a story about torturing and castrating another person because of the stories that person reads would be fun. It suggests an extreme level of intolerance about other people and their fantasies.

Remember, these are all just fantasies. This isn't real.

If you believe that you can infer from the stories people read that they are "sexually disturbing individuals" then you have no idea what you are talking about. Millions of perfectly normal people read all manner of fantasy erotic stories.

If the thought arouses than the fantasy isn’t as far from reality as you believe. Also if my fantasy is to avenge those who were raped or molested by a family member who Is anyone else to judge that? If you think it’s ok to fantasize about fucking your mother or sister it’s perfectly fine for me to fantasize about torturing those who were raped or molested is it not?
 
If the thought arouses than the fantasy isn’t as far from reality as you believe. Also if my fantasy is to avenge those who were raped or molested by a family member who Is anyone else to judge that? If you think it’s ok to fantasize about fucking your mother or sister it’s perfectly fine for me to fantasize about torturing those who were raped or molested is it not?
Incest is (legally) having sex with a person too closely related to you to marry. Leaving out the fact that the State has no legitimate reason to regulate sexual activity at all, and the fact that every argument I am aware of against consanguine sex is specious at best but usually also capricious. Incest does not equal abuse or rape. In so many ways incest is just normal sex with somebody you already have an existing relationship with.

(I also won't go into what's technically "wrong" with Lit's overly broad definition, but taken to its logical conclusion if we have families of origin and weren't found abandoned in the woods by space aliens we are all engaged in incest, non-consensual sex and unless we were spawned at 18, underage sex.)

The ban against "advocating" consanguine relationships is used to justify removing rational comments citing university research. While allowing trolls to claim that consensual sex between related persons is responsible for the trade deficit and tropical storms without being countered.

If in your past you were the victim of a crime, it is the act that was a crime. Not the status of the criminal. If someone was raped it isn't the race of the assailant or the perpetrators profession that committed the crime. If a person used a job position, political position or church position to commit a crime, the organization involved should look rationally at the perks of the job that permitted excess.

But my experience is that criminalizing status has exactly the opposite effect. Not everyone in government is lazy. But lazy people abound there. Its easy to go after drug dealers and prostitutes -- their income depends on interaction with customers. Its easy to demonize and go after people based on status. No real work is required. And its completely counter-productive.

Every hour and every dollar spent working in the opposite direction destroys the very thing the hypocrites claim to be defending. It's the "anti-gay-marriage" argument. Hetrosexuals can meet at 9PM and be legally married at 9:15 and divorced in three days. That is called: "sanctity of marriage." Two people in a monogamous committed relationship for 50 years are "perverts." Uh huh.

When the government says this, I listen. But not being a sub-moron I see that what it means is: "don't trust ANYTHING the government says EVER.

When the pseudo-Church defends (non-incestuous) pedophiles while denigrating consanguine relationships Like the ones Adam and Eve's children, or Noah's children, or Nahor's children, or Sarah and Abraham's children, or Issac and Rebekka's son Jacob, or their grandchildren and simultaneous cousins (Becky's brother being her son's wive's father and all) had ...

Well I see them for what they are: at best an amoral and at worst an immoral profane power structure devoid a hint of grace.

When someone advocates "traditional values" but is unaware of the FACT that incest is one of mankind's OLDEST traditional values:

Genesis 28: 2 "Go to the house of Bethuel, your mother’s father, in Northwest Mesopotamia. Laban, your mother’s brother, lives there. Marry one of his daughters."

Well I just shake my head.
 
Last edited:
If the thought arouses than the fantasy isn’t as far from reality as you believe.

This is completely false. There is no reason to believe this. Millions of people fantasize all the time about things they would never want to experience in real life. Women have rape fantasies, for example.



Also if my fantasy is to avenge those who were raped or molested by a family member who Is anyone else to judge that? If you think it’s ok to fantasize about fucking your mother or sister it’s perfectly fine for me to fantasize about torturing those who were raped or molested is it not?

That's not what your original post was about. You keep slipping and sliding around what you originally said.

You did not say anything about fantasizing about torturing those who were raped or molested (why would you fantasize about those who were victims, anyway? don't you mean those who did the raping and molesting?)

Your original post suggested you enjoy fantasizing about people whose FANTASIES are about incest. You like fantasies about torturing and castrating those people. Why would anyone fantasize about that? You like thinking about hurting people because of their fantasy lives?

Incest at Literotica is NOT about rape and molestation. It is strictly between consenting adults. It has nothing to do with pedophilia or rape.
 
The last part will get the story removed, even if the victim consented.
The first part is just kink-shaming.
I am of the opinion if your story reads more like a detailed police report, it shouldn't be published here regardless of the content.
 
This is completely false. There is no reason to believe this. Millions of people fantasize all the time about things they would never want to experience in real life. Women have rape fantasies, for example.





That's not what your original post was about. You keep slipping and sliding around what you originally said.

You did not say anything about fantasizing about torturing those who were raped or molested (why would you fantasize about those who were victims, anyway? don't you mean those who did the raping and molesting?)

Your original post suggested you enjoy fantasizing about people whose FANTASIES are about incest. You like fantasies about torturing and castrating those people. Why would anyone fantasize about that? You like thinking about hurting people because of their fantasy lives?

Incest at Literotica is NOT about rape and molestation. It is strictly between consenting adults. It has nothing to do with pedophilia or rape.

If its all just fantasy whats the difference? Rape, torture, etc. You can fantasize about fucking your mother I can fantasize about torturing the people who rape and fuck their relatives. You don't like it bc it doesn't suit your fantasies. Not my problem. Take your trolling elsewhere. If your Mom wanted to fuck you you wouldnt be spending so much time worrying about my story ideas and more creating hillbilly demon children.
 
Back
Top