High heels

I appreciate your points. I too have spent time in that industry, but I have some counter points with all due respect.

As we all know, proportions differ for many people. Some people have larger heads in proportion to their body, its more common than you'd expect. If you take a look at the other photos of Jane here, you'll see her beautiful proportions as they are, and as the photos below.

Below is from the same photo shoot (with the same proportions, same hairstyle, same bikini, even the block paving is the same... My only regret is her feet are in shadow, damn it!)...

https://pics.wikifeet.com/Jane-Seymour-Feet-688293.jpg

https://pics.wikifeet.com/Jane-Seymour-Feet-1407483.jpg

Jane's face along it's edge, with the light source behind her, is somewhat blurred but that is a normal phenomenon in photos, especially with 35mm photography back in the day. On the same point, the degradation runs across all of the image equally, including Jane's face and jawline.

The light source, and shadowing are also consistent across all the image.

She strikes the same masterful pose here (I love it!)...

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fusercontent1.hubstatic.com%2F8018266_50.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

IMHO it is a legitimate photo of a beautiful woman. You know what, I never thought I'd be discussing the luscious Jane Seymour to this extent... What a hoot!

Maybe???

I thought the right side of her head, in looking at it close, really looked like they cut the face and pasted it on, and then tried to blend the cut line by softening that part of the image. For me, hair was the hardest part of cutting and pasting, and it looked like they struggled too.

Of course now they have face-swapping to everything is so much easier!
 
Maybe???

I thought the right side of her head, in looking at it close, really looked like they cut the face and pasted it on, and then tried to blend the cut line by softening that part of the image. For me, hair was the hardest part of cutting and pasting, and it looked like they struggled too.

Of course now they have face-swapping to everything is so much easier!

I still contest your point as simply a natural anomaly of the light source behind the foreground, and how older cameras distorted the image under those conditions. The same natural anomaly is apparent between her knees (especially the inner right leg), with their outer edges blurry, same as the side of her face.

What about this though... Why?

Both of those photos are old. Why not use clearer photos, as it'd be a heck of lot easier.

Why not paste Jane's face on another more voluptuous/proportionate body instead of her own (BTW, I love her proportions as they are)?

I did look into contacting Jane about the photo, but her agents only answer business or professional queries. I just thought it'd be nice to know for sure, although I am convinced of its authenticity IMHO.

I think we'd have to respectfully agree to disagree (but I have enjoyed the discussion)?
 
Last edited:
She is very gushable....:heart:

Indeed! What I'm starting to really appreciate (and I know it sounds cheesy), many of the women I've gushed about on the MILF thread, are beautiful on the outside, because they were/they are beautiful on the inside to begin with...
 
Indeed! What I'm starting to really appreciate (and I know it sounds cheesy), many of the women I've gushed about on the MILF thread, are beautiful on the outside, because they were/they are beautiful on the inside to begin with...

I totally agree with you..:)
 
favorites

attachment.php

a pair of my wife's favorite heels

http://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2116751&stc=1&d=1618340368
 
Back
Top