Kam's niece blasted for tweet assuming Colorado shooter was white man

Counselor706

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Posts
2,665
Vice President Kamala Harris' niece said Tuesday she assumed the suspected mass shooter in Colorado was a White man in part because he was taken into custody alive, leading to accusations she engaged in racial profiling.

Meena Harrris was forced to delete a tweet erroneously assuming the race of the suspected killer of 10 people in a Boulder grocery store, after it was revealed he was of Syrian descent.

"The Atlanta shooting was not even a week ago. Violent white men are the greatest terrorist threat to our country," Meena Harris tweeted on Monday.

Harris received sharp criticism for her racially charged jump to conclusion.
Source
 
Violent white and sallow men are the greatest terrorist threat to our country.

Better?
 
The shooter IS a white man. What makes anyone think that a Muslim of Syrian descent can't be a Caucasian? What race do you think he is? Muslims aren't automatically something other than Caucasian.
 
And she apologized - for no reason.

So being a racist isn't a reason to apologize?

LOL look at that....luk openly defending racism. :cool:

The shooter IS a white man. What makes anyone think that a Muslim of Syrian descent can't be a Caucasian? What race do you think he is? Muslims aren't automatically something other than Caucasian.

Because Syrians are Arab/Persian.

They're Asians....and no the shooter is not Caucasian, he's Asian.

Check your white hatred you racist piece of shit.
 
Last edited:
No one cares what your idiotic definitions mean, Poor lil Dumb-Dumb. You live in your own tiny world so we'll just let you play in that sandbox. Hopefully, the cats don't bury you.
 
No one cares what your idiotic definitions mean, Poor lil Dumb-Dumb. You live in your own tiny world so we'll just let you play in that sandbox. Hopefully, the cats don't bury you.

Luk can't refute shit so he gets mad at the fact words mean things. :D

Yes luk we all know you don't care about definitions.

You make it very clear on a regular basis you don't care what words mean.
 
So being a racist isn't a reason to apologize?

LOL look at that....luk openly defending racism. :cool:



Because Syrians are Arab/Persian.

They're Asians....and no the shooter is not Caucasian, he's Asian.

Check your white hatred you racist piece of shit.

Nope. Most Syrians are Caucasian. It's YOUR racism your showing, you ass.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Asian isn't a race. It's a location. Most Syrians are Caucasian. It's YOUR racism your showing, you ass.

You want to play that bullshit?

Caucasian isn't a race either, it's an outdated term sociology hasn't recognized since the 70's.

There is only one scientifically recognized race, Homo sapien.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/517/111/fbd.jpg


Now back in the real world, outside of white loathing democrats desperate to use this shooting to demonize white people...... neither Persians nor Arabs are considered white. They are widely classified as being Asian.

Enjoy that sting son....I hope it fuels your obvious hatred of white people so we can do this again sometime SOON :D
 
neither Persians nor Arabs are considered white. They are widely classified as being Asian.

By racists like you perhaps. But you're wrong. Most Syrians are Caucasian. Cite the source for your incorrect call, which undoubtedly will be one of the racist sources you tend to rely on.
 
Last edited:
.
Yeah, saw his picture today and the shooter appeared to me to be white and male.

I wonder how BoBo would be described in the aftermath of a mass shooting event.

Hmmmm???
 
Because Syrians are Arab/Persian.

Syrians are 70% + Arabs and less than 1% Persian. Circassian, Turkmen, Greek, Albanian, Armenians and Kurds are all larger minorities than Persians.

The definition of Caucasian as a subtype of humanity has been replaced by DNA bases. Asian has never been a description of any sort except as an expression of physical geography; the traditional and largely discarded term was Mongoloid.
 
By racists like you perhaps.

Referring to people from their regional/ethnic organs as opposed to outdated concepts of "race" like "Caucasian" is literally the opposite of being racist.

But you're wrong. Most Syrians are Caucasian.

"Caucasian" is not a thing.

Cite the source for your incorrect call, which undoubtedly will be one of the racist sources you tend to rely on.

Take an intro to sociology class some time or hit google son, not my job to provide you with a BASIC education. ;)
 
Syrians are 70% + Arabs and less than 1% Persian. Circassian, Turkmen, Greek, Albanian, Armenians and Kurds are all larger minorities than Persians

Sure.

Asian has never been a description of any sort except as an expression of physical geography; the traditional and largely discarded term was Mongoloid.

Respectfully, this is incorrect.

Both sociologically and as far as most western governments are concerned it's widely and regularly used to refer to any number of people/cultures originating from the Asian continent.

The US Department of Defense/Army has me categorized as "Asian"....not mongoloid.

Just like "African/ _____" , "pacific islander" and "Native American".

the traditional and largely discarded term was Mongoloid.

Yes, along with Caucasoid (caucasian) and Negroid (negro).

Like I said...outdated racist shit no longer used by most governments and practically zero scientist.

Using specific geographical, cultural or national classifiers is the NOT racist way to categorize people, unlike the outdated concept of "race" categories KeithD and the other purveyors of racial identity politics are so fond of.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top