pointless
¿por qué no?
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 58,994
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Parler’s site was a mess. Its public API used no authentication. When users deleted their posts, the site failed to remove the content and instead only added a delete flag to it. Oh, and each post carried a numerical ID that was incremented from the ID of the most recently published one.
The rookie code made it easy to automate the scraping, as this script used by donk_enby’s archival team demonstrates. As a result, massive numbers of posts that discussed the insurrection before, during, and after it was carried out will be preserved indefinitely so that they’re available to researchers, journalists, prosecutors, and others.
Another amateur mistake was Parler’s failure to scrub geolocations from images and videos posted online. Sites like Twitter and Google routinely remove such metadata from content posted by their users. The video files hosted on Parler, by contrast, were “raw,” meaning they still contained this information.
Yuuuup.....can't have free speech, it threatens the establishment.![]()
wolrah
Please stop spreading this falsehood. The idea that Parler is lightly moderated and encourages free speech is purely marketing lies on their part. As noted by others their moderation is quite strict for the purpose of creating a right wing "safe space" where their ideas won't be questioned.Quote:
Parler’s moderation policies—even more lax than those of Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube—already made the site popular with far-right users looking for a forum to discuss debunked conspiracy theories.
For example:
rabish12 wrote:
It's actually worse than just banning left-wing content. One of the more... "interesting" details to come out of the breach is that new users start out shadowbanned until enough of their posts are approved.
This has nothing to do with free speech.
This has nothing to do with free speech.
It's funny that Deplorables think they can re-define free speech by repeatedly lying about what it is. It's so cute.![]()
It's funny that Deplorables think they can re-define free speech by repeatedly lying about what it is. It's so cute.![]()
It's funny that Deplorables think they can re-define free speech by repeatedly lying about what it is. It's so cute.![]()
Wow.... from comments on that article:
It's the Trumpian technique. It's worked pretty well with the weak of brain.
Reminds me of the time I got banned from a pro sports teams political forum because I said America only started being truly great when unions and civil rights groups organized to expand access to the American Dream. I'm betting a comment like that on "Paler" would result in banning.
In other news, it's being reported that the Capitol traitors used "Paler" to plan and coordinate the Capitol attack. Not surprising really.
Nobody is trying to redefine it, except maybe SGT?? Doubt he'll stand by anything solid.
And certainly the "progressives" with their regular claims that 'hate speech isn't free speech!' lol...yes it is dumb leftist.
You're just anti-Free speech like most "progressive" democrats and too ashamed of it to own it.![]()
Let us know how the government is limiting what people can say. Looking forward to your response.
Yuuuup.....can't have free speech, it threatens the establishment.![]()
What's the government got to do with it??
Where did I ever claim government is limiting what people can say??
Post #5.
Here comes the, "I didn't say what I was directly quoted saying."
Bot's like 45, he gets upset when you use his own words against him.
Questions and a comment:
So this Parler is a hotbed of the worse of the conspiracy nuts and was used to plan and coordinate the attack on the capital? So WTF didn't the FBI or someone in law enforcement have eyes or ears on what was going on? Or did they and ignored it because they thought it wasn't going to amount to anything?
If it were me, I'd leave it up. It's easy to keep an eye on the crazies if you got 'em all in one spot. And before someone goes off, I'm not advocating illegal monitoring; the FBI has legal ways to monitor crazies ready to do bad behavior.
Comshaw
Bot's like 45, he gets upset when you use his own words against him.
That's why he's constantly backpedaling or moving the goalposts, and has a meltdown when you call him out for it.