The GENDER INEQUALITY BS! What rights do men have that women doint?

[sighLent]

The Inequlaity BS

IS JUST UTTER TRASH


For that matter so is income inequlity and racial inequality

If Im wrong

Tell him what rights do women and coloreds NOT HAVE?

 

[Champakian]

It doesn't need to.

 

[YesMO]

Just for funsies and cuz you guys made another list. Congratulations.

Women won the right to vote in 1920. The next step was supposed to be full equality for women under the Constitution. Almost a century later, that still has not happened. The United States Constitution still does not provide women with the same rights as men. Ratifying the ERA would secure a woman’s rights and provide her with legal equality in the United States of America.

Not only has the United States not ratified the Equal Rights Amendment it is the only developed nation that has not ratified the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Countries who ratify the CEDAW are required to enshrine gender equality into their domestic legislation, repeal all discriminatory provisions in their laws, and enact new provisions to guard against discrimination against women. The only countries in the United Nations who haven’t ratified CEDAW are: Iran, Palau, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tonga, and the United States.

Comprising a majority of the population both in the United States and worldwide, women presently bear the brunt of economic injustice, violence, poverty and hunger. Studies show that improving the condition of women raises the standard of living for the community as a whole.

If the ERA were ratified, there would no longer be a reason for the United States not to ratify CEDAW. The impact on the women worldwide, if the U.S. ratified CEDAW, would be profound and life changing for tens of millions of women and girls. The enforcement of CEDAW worldwide depends on the United States commitment to women – for this commitment to be real, we need full legal equality for women here at home first.

https://eraeducationproject.com/dont-men-and-women-already-have-equal-rights-in-america/

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah what rights do men have that women do not have simple question everything is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

 

[YesMO]

And now tell me about income inequality and tell me about racial inequality

 

[bellisarius]

Okay.
...the median Black family, with just over $3,500, owns just 2 percent of the wealth of the nearly $147,000 the median White family owns. The median Latino family, with just over $6,500, owns just 4 percent of the wealth of the median White family. Put differently, the median White family has 41 times more wealth than the median Black family and 22 times more wealth than the median Latino family.

Families that have zero or even “negative” wealth (meaning the value of their debts exceeds the value of their assets) live on the edge, just one minor economic setback away from tragedy. Our Racial Wealth Divide report shows that Black and Latino families are much more likely to be in this precarious situation. The proportion of Black families with zero or negative wealth rose by 8.5 percent to 37 percent between 1983 and 2016. The proportion of Latino families with zero or negative net worth declined by 19 percent over the past 30 years but is still more than twice as high as the rate for Whites.

https://inequality.org/facts/racial-inequality/

What in the world does that have to do with "rights?"

 

[Champakian]

The median for the black family, as it is for women, is on the rise.*
Things do not happen overnight, but they do happen.

You know, I was watching football yesterday and they had this commercial
which was touting some effort (and the need) for boosting education for
children of color and they had every single color but white and yellow.

Why do you think that is? Could it be "sub-cultural?"



* One of the thing that still continues to depress it is the
notion that illegal (cheap labor) immigration from the south
is what builds a great economy and a greater culture...

 

[Champakian]

He asked about income and racial inequality. I believe the first article I linked talked about the rights.

The United States Constitution still does not provide women with the same rights as men.

https://eraeducationproject.com/dont-men-and-women-already-have-equal-rights-in-america/

It doesn't need to.

 

[Champakian]

Not necessary.
It has already been codified into law.
President Obama even signed the Ledbetter legislation with great flourish.

You cannot discriminate on the basis of gender nor can you pay on the basis of gender.
No Amendment will change that -- it would just be symbolic "feel-good" legislation.

 

[CornusKousa]

Just for funsies and cuz you guys made another list. Congratulations.

Women won the right to vote in 1920. The next step was supposed to be full equality for women under the Constitution. Almost a century later, that still has not happened. The United States Constitution still does not provide women with the same rights as men. Ratifying the ERA would secure a woman’s rights and provide her with legal equality in the United States of America.

Your source needs to do better research.

June 8, 1866 the 14th amendment, providing equal rights to all, was ratified.

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

Now the battle for compliance is another issue altogether but the legislative facet of the equal rights battle was won in 1866.

Everything else since has just been a matter of compliance. Which took about a century but, all things considered is pretty rapid change.

Your source:

Not only has the United States not ratified the Equal Rights Amendment it is the only developed nation that has not ratified the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

Because that would be redundancy piled on redundancy......how many times do we have to write the same thing down??? Having it written down into law isn't the problem, hasn't been for well over a century.....compliance has been. But not currently in the US or anywhere in the first world as far as I know.

Which brings us back to OP.

If there is a compliance issue, where is it?? There is a fucking ARMY of lawyers that would love to take up your case....free of charge.

 

[sighLent]

Okay.
...the median Black family, with just over $3,500, owns just 2 percent of the wealth of the nearly $147,000 the median White family owns. The median Latino family, with just over $6,500, owns just 4 percent of the wealth of the median White family. Put differently, the median White family has 41 times more wealth than the median Black family and 22 times more wealth than the median Latino family.

Families that have zero or even “negative” wealth (meaning the value of their debts exceeds the value of their assets) live on the edge, just one minor economic setback away from tragedy. Our Racial Wealth Divide report shows that Black and Latino families are much more likely to be in this precarious situation. The proportion of Black families with zero or negative wealth rose by 8.5 percent to 37 percent between 1983 and 2016. The proportion of Latino families with zero or negative net worth declined by 19 percent over the past 30 years but is still more than twice as high as the rate for Whites.

https://inequality.org/facts/racial-inequality/

let em become athletes or rappers

and make millions

 

[sighLent]

let em become athletes or rappers

and make millions

the point is

they make what their TALENT allows, has shit to do with color

there is no income inequlaity, there are TALENT etc differences

 

[sighLent]

what rights do WOMEN NOT HAVE?

what rights do COLOREDS NOT HAVE?




NON!

its all BS

 

[CornusKousa]

Okay.
...the median Black family, with just over $3,500, owns just 2 percent of the wealth of the nearly $147,000 the median White family owns.

He asked about income and racial inequality. I believe the first article I linked talked about the rights.

You're conflating economic inequity with legal equality.

Not the same thing, not even the same ball park actually.

The United States Constitution still does not provide women with the same rights as men.

https://eraeducationproject.com/dont-men-and-women-already-have-equal-rights-in-america/

^^ Again this is absolute bullshit.

 

[CornusKousa]

what rights do WOMEN NOT HAVE?

what rights do COLOREDS NOT HAVE?




NON!

its all BS

She can't say

*buh buh on average they make less money!!* is the best they've got.

They can't point to any actual rights or immunities under the law.....they can't stop conflating the two though.

 

[Champakian]

It's a step in the right direction but not enough. Why should an employee have to be the person who discovers the problem, polices the system, spends a fortune to get their day in court, when the employer can outspend them easily? Why shouldn't employers prove that they are abiding by the law and that they have fair labour practices?

As pointed out, all you are asking for is window dressing, a day in the sun,
a moment to enshrine as a historical highpoint and an empty gesture,
a symbolic victory completely lacking in true substance that is
rooted in true egregious grievance...

 

[CornusKousa]

It's a step in the right direction but not enough. Why should an employee have to be the person who discovers the problem, polices the system, spends a fortune to get their day in court, when the employer can outspend them easily? Why shouldn't employers prove that they are abiding by the law and that they have fair labour practices?

Because in the USA you're innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

 

[Champakian]

Don't get me started on the ridiculously inflated salaries of some athletes, actors and musicians.

Actresses and singers included in that too?

 

[Champakian]

Lol, "actress" is not woke, they're all "actors" now.
And yes singers too.

Then your point is somewhat moot...

 

[bellisarius]

He asked about income and racial inequality. I believe the first article I linked talked about the rights.

The United States Constitution still does not provide women with the same rights as men.

https://eraeducationproject.com/dont-men-and-women-already-have-equal-rights-in-america/

Actually it does, and that is the reason that the ERA failed. The 14th, 15th, and 19th amendments made the ERA superfluous. The various states as well as congress have enacted legislation that have made attempts to abridge those rights punishable under law.

So again the question, exactly what "rights" do men have that women don't?

 

[sighLent]

or blacks?

 

[sighLent]

Income

Racial

Women inequality is all BS

 

[Sean Renaud]

I also consider the term SJW a compliment.

Beats RWCJ.

I'm sorry I've been out of the room since Trump took office. A lot of us on the Left took a soft or hard oath to bow out if over qualified but unloved Hillary lost.

You're fucking amazing. I regret not noticing you earlier.

 

[sighLent]

Lol, flattery will get you everywhere.

didnt fucking get ME anywhere

 

[Sean Renaud]

It also wasn't flattery. It was a statment of fact.

Seriously guys I've been here forever, where did we get all these noobs from and can we keep a few of em. Except whatver name Busybody is going by?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

It also wasn't flattery. It was a statment of fact.

Seriously guys I've been here forever, where did we get all these noobs from and can we keep a few of em. Except whatver name Busybody is going by?

This thread is the latest Busybody alt. All the other "noobs" are the other nutjobs who have been banned but just can't stay away.